Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01DA045613 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This research examines the efficacy of an individually-delivered intervention tailored for YMSM in relationships. The intervention - termed PARTNER - utilizes a brief (4 session) motivational interviewing format to target Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake/adherence, HIV transmission risk behavior, and associated drug use.
This study aims to evaluate a individual-focused intervention with an integrated focus on drug use and HIV prevention, including uptake of and adherence to PrEP. The investigators will recruit a sample of 240 partnered individuals.
Recruitment occurs using a mix of in-person and Internet recruitment. Outreach workers will visit bars and events in the New York City area to recruit participants. Also,information on our project will be posted on social media sites (e.g.,Facebook, Grindr, Scruff). Interested individuals will complete a brief online screener to assess eligibility. A telephone screener will be conducted with participants who are preliminarily eligible based upon online screener responses. Participants who are eligible based upon telephone screening responses will be sent an email. The email contains a link for them to access the baseline online survey. It provides information which introduces the study to the recruited partner and a link to the baseline survey online. If participants indicate intimate partner violence (IPV) on the online baseline survey, participants will be rendered ineligible. Only the participant that indicated experiencing IPV will be given a list of local referrals to access IPV-related services.
An in-person baseline assessment appointment will be scheduled after both participants have completed the online survey.
The in-person baseline assessment appointment consists of four components; written consent, a computer-assisted self interview (CASI), a timeline follow back interview, and biological testing.
Written consent is obtained prior to the start of any in-person baseline activity. Participants additionally complete a computer-assisted self interview (CASI). After this, participants will independently complete a TFLB. TLFB is a semi-structured interview to collect retrospective event-level data on drug use, sexual behavior and PrEP adherence (for those on PrEP) in the past 30 days.
The final part of the in-person baseline assessment consists of biological testing for STI (gonorrhea & chlamydia via urinalysis and rectal swabs), drug testing via 5-panel fingernail drug assay via finger or toe nail clippings. Drugs tested are 5 major drugs: Amphetamines, Cannabinoids, Cocaine, Opiates, and Phencyclidine (PCP). HIV testing will consist of a finder prick test using the Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo test. Participants indicating current PrEP use will receive an HIV test via blood draw for a laboratory immunoassay. Participants indicating current PrEP give an additional blood sample and fingernail sample to examine PrEP adherence using a dried blood spot for western blot analysis and fingernail assay.
After the baseline assessment, participants will be randomized to receive their first PARTNER or Education session, of which will occur immediately following their baseline assessment.
The study will employ a stratified randomization procedure using an algorithm via Qualtrics. Participants will be randomized using three couple-level criteria as reported by the participant. Participants will be randomized based on relationship length difference (less than 2 years versus 2 or more), age difference (less than 3 years versus 3 or more), racial difference (both white versus all others combinations), PrEP use (Participant reports current PrEP use versus does not report current use).
Each of the intervention arms consists of 4 sessions that occur once a week for four consecutive weeks.
All participants complete a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month follow ups. At the 3 month follow up (post baseline assessment), participants complete a survey with a TLFB, fingernail specimen collection for drug use. For participants indicating current PrEP use, participants and give blood for a dried blood spot analysis and an additional fingernail sample to test for PrEP uptake/adherence.
At the 6 month follow up month follow up (post baseline assessment), participants complete a survey with a TLFB, fingernail specimen collection for drug use, biological testing for STI (gonorrhea & chlamydia via urinalysis and rectal swabs) and HIV testing using the Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo test. Participants indicating current PrEP use will receive an HIV test via blood draw for a laboratory immunoassay Also, for participants indicating current PrEP use, participants and give blood for a dried blood spot analysis and an additional fingernail sample to test for PrEP uptake/adherence.
At the 9 month follow up (post baseline assessment), participants complete a survey with a TLFB, fingernail specimen collection for drug use. For participants indicating current PrEP use, participants and give blood for a dried blood spot analysis and an additional fingernail sample to test for PrEP uptake/adherence.
At final assessment (12 month follow up post baseline assessment), participants complete a survey with a TLFB, fingernail specimen collection for drug use, biological testing for STI (gonorrhea & chlamydia via urinalysis and rectal swabs) and HIV testing using the Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo test. Participants indicating current PrEP use will receive an HIV test via blood draw for a laboratory immunoassay Also, for participants indicating current PrEP use, participants and give blood for a dried blood spot analysis and an additional fingernail sample to test for PrEP uptake/adherence.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PARTNER Intervention | Experimental | This intervention is a four-session intervention designed to increase PrEP uptake, increase PrEP adherence, and reduce drug use and HIV transmission risk behaviors of individuals in relationships. |
|
| Education Intervention | Active Comparator | This intervention is a four-session intervention that discussed drug use and its effect on physiological social functioning. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PARTNER | Behavioral | The PATRNER intervention addresses, drug use, PrEP uptake/adherence, and HIV transmission risk by enhancing communication skills by integrating motivational interviewing and video-based communication skills training. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Illicit Drug Use Days | The self-reported number of illicit drug use days (not including marijuana) in the past 30 days | Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month |
| Cannabis Use Days | The self-reported number of cannabis drug use days in the past 30 days | Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month |
| Number (Proportion) of Participants Who Report Sexual HIV Transmission Risk With Casual Partners | The percentage of participants in each condition reporting sexual HIV transmission risk with a casual partner (any condomless sex with a casual partner in the absence of PrEP). | Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month |
| The Number (Proportion) of Participants Reporting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake | The percentage participants in each condition who report having a current PrEP prescription at the time of follow-up. | Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month, |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Both gender at birth and current self-identified gender must be male.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tyrel J Starks, PhD | Hunter College of City University of New York | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter College- City University of New York | New York | New York | 10018 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24364800 | Background | Parsons JT, Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Botsko M, Golub SA. A randomized controlled trial utilizing motivational interviewing to reduce HIV risk and drug use in young gay and bisexual men. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Feb;82(1):9-18. doi: 10.1037/a0035311. Epub 2013 Dec 23. | |
| 31274114 | Derived | Starks TJ, Robles G, Pawson M, Jimenez RH, Gandhi M, Parsons JT, Millar BM. Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Drug Use and HIV Incidence Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in Relationships and Are High Priority for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (Project PARTNER): Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jul 4;8(7):e13015. doi: 10.2196/13015. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Partner Intervention | The PATRNER intervention addresses, drug use, PrEP uptake/adherence, and HIV transmission risk by enhancing communication skills by integrating motivational interviewing and video-based communication skills training. |
| FG001 | Education Intervention | The Education intervention consists of a 4-session health education intervention that addresses sexual risk and substance use through a lecture and question and answer format. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Partner Intervention | The PATRNER intervention addresses, drug use, PrEP uptake/adherence, and HIV transmission risk by enhancing communication skills by integrating motivational interviewing and video-based communication skills training. |
| BG001 | Education Intervention |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Illicit Drug Use Days | The self-reported number of illicit drug use days (not including marijuana) in the past 30 days | intent-to-treat population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days | Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month |
|
12 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | PARTNER Intervention | This intervention is a four-session intervention designed to increase PrEP uptake, increase PrEP adherence, and reduce drug use and HIV transmission risk behaviors of individuals in relationships. PARTNER: The PATRNER intervention addresses, drug use, PrEP uptake/adherence, and HIV transmission risk by enhancing communication skills by integrating motivational interviewing and video-based communication skills training. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Tyrel Starks | Hunter College | 212-772-5550 | tstarks@hunter.cuny.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 1, 2024 | Jun 11, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Dec 5, 2022 | Jun 10, 2025 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055118 | Medication Adherence |
| D040242 | Risk Reduction Behavior |
| D012725 | Sexual Behavior |
| D000163 | Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010349 | Patient Compliance |
| D010342 | Patient Acceptance of Health Care |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018479 | Early Intervention, Educational |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002662 | Child Health Services |
| D003153 | Community Health Services |
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Education Intervention | Behavioral | The Education intervention consists of a 4-session health education intervention that addresses sexual risk and substance use through a lecture and question and answer format. |
|
The Education intervention consists of a 4-session health education intervention that addresses sexual risk and substance use through a lecture and question and answer format. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Sexual Identity | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Residence | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Education | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| PrEP status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Interpersonal Communication Communication Competence Scale | The Interpersonal Communication Competence Scale (Rubin, 1994) assesses self-disclosure, social anxiety, assertiveness, and empathy. Each statement is evaluated on a 5- point Likert scale ranging from 0 (almost never) to 4 (almost always). Total score was summed and had a range of 0 to 48. Higher scores indicated greater communication competence. Rubin RB, Martin MM. Development of a measure of interpersonal competence. Communication Research Reports. 1994;11(1):33-44. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Approximation to an Ideal subscale of the Multiple Determinants of Relationship Commitment Inventory | Relationship satisfaction is assessed using the approximation to ideal subscale of the Multiple Determinants of Relationship Commitment Inventory (Kurdek, 1998). The subscale is 4 items with response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total range is 4 to 20. Higher scores indicated greater relationship satisfaction. Kurdek LA. Relationship outcomes and their predictors: Longitudinal evidence from heterosexual married, gay cohabiting, and lesbian cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1998;60(3):553-68. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Cannabis Use Days | The self-reported number of cannabis drug use days in the past 30 days | intent-to-treat population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days | Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Number (Proportion) of Participants Who Report Sexual HIV Transmission Risk With Casual Partners | The percentage of participants in each condition reporting sexual HIV transmission risk with a casual partner (any condomless sex with a casual partner in the absence of PrEP). | intent-to-treat population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | The Number (Proportion) of Participants Reporting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake | The percentage participants in each condition who report having a current PrEP prescription at the time of follow-up. | intent-to-treat population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, 3-Month, 6-Month, 9-Month, 12-Month, |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 94 |
| 0 |
| 94 |
| 0 |
| 94 |
| EG001 | Education Intervention | This intervention is a four-session intervention that discussed drug use and its effect on physiological social functioning. Education Intervention: The Education intervention consists of a 4-session health education intervention that addresses sexual risk and substance use through a lecture and question and answer format. | 0 | 102 | 0 | 102 | 0 | 102 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D015658 | HIV Infections |
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D015229 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral |
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| D016180 | Lentivirus Infections |
| D012192 | Retroviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D012897 | Slow Virus Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007153 | Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D011314 | Preventive Health Services |
| 6-Month |
|
| 9-Month |
|
| 12-Month |
|
| Latent Growth Curve |
| .054 |
A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention at the 3-month follow-up. |
| Slope |
| -.281 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -.623 |
| .061 |
| Superiority |
| Latent Growth Curve | .036 | A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention across the 3-,6-,9-, and 12- month follow-ups. | Slope | 0.125 | 2-Sided | 95 | -.011 | .260 | Superiority |
| 6-Month |
|
| 9-Month |
|
| 12-Month |
|
| Latent Growth Curve |
| .359 |
A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention at the 3-month follow-up. |
| Slope |
| -.301 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.938 |
| 1.336 |
| Superiority |
| Latent Growth Curve | .431 | A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention across the 3-,6-,9-, and 12- month follow-ups. | Slope | .048 | 2-Sided | 95 | -.496 | .593 | Superiority |
| 6-Month |
|
| 9-Month |
|
| 12-Month |
|
| Latent Growth Curve |
| .384 |
A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention at the 3-month follow-up. |
| Slope |
| .246 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.383 |
| 1.875 |
| Superiority |
| Latent Growth Curve | .019 | A latent growth curve (LGC) with an intercept and linear slope was specified. The intercept quoted here represents the difference between the Partner intervention and the Education intervention across the 3-,6-,9-, and 12- month follow-ups. | Slope | .856 | 2-Sided | 95 | .052 | 1.659 | Superiority |