Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-001446-10 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Investigator decision in accordance with the promotor
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multicenter, open-label phase II study, assessing the efficacy of elotuzumab in elderly patients with multiple myeloma undergoing peripheral stem cell autologous graft
In patients of 65 years of age or older, intensive treatment (TI) with hematopoietic stem cell autologous graft (ASCH) is not considered as the gold standard. Nowadays, given the rise of new treatments, new studies assessing TI with ASCH in elderly, seem required. The association bortezomib (VEL) - thalidomide (THAL) - dexamethasone (DEX) is considered as the standard induction (Kumar, Flinn et al. 2012, Ludwig, Viterbo et al. 2013). However, more and more strategies with immunotherapies are developed. Furthermore, it looks encouraging to use several monoclonal antibodies at different clinical development levels. Thus, elotuzumab (ELO) is an IgG1 (immunoglobulin gamma-1) (IgGκ) humanized monoclonal antibody directed against SLAMF7. SLAMF7 is a glycoprotein expressed by myeloma cells and natural killer (NK) but not by healthy tissues. Consequently, elotuzumab can kill specifically myeloma cells without affecting healthy tissues (Hsi, Steinle et al. 2008). A phase I study assessed the safety of ELO in association with VEL, REV (Lenalidomide) and DEX in induction first-line treatment in elderly patients with median age of 67 years (Usmani, Sexton et al. 2015). There were no significant increase of side effects with this association compared with side effects usually reported with VEL, REV and DEX. Thus, adding ELO could lead to an increase of response rate, with no increase of toxicity.
For more than 10 years, the standard intensive treatment associates a MEL (MELPHALAN) conditioning (200 mg/m2) with a blood graft. In a recent study, almost all patients aged between 65-69 and 70-74 years received MEL at 200 mg/m2. The adverse events rate was similar between the different ages and a very low non-tied relapse mortality. Thus, in elderly patients selected, the use of MEL at 200 mg/m2 seems sure.
Moreover, it's widely admitted that the conditioning treatment should be based on an efficient drugs association with a limited toxicity. Studies assessing consolidation treatment with an association of new drugs are limited. Initial results suggest that the use of new drugs after intensive treatment (IT) with ASCH should increase response rate and improve progression-free survival and global survival.
The aim of this study IFM 2016-03 is to assess intensive treatment (IT) with AHSCT (Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) in elderly and to associate the different steps (induction, high dose conditioning, consolidation) with immunotherapy. Given the prior results of IFM and international studies, a VGPR (Very Good Partial Response) rate of around 85% is expected.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elotuzumab | Experimental | This is a single arm phase II trial to assess the Very Good Partial Response rate of a strategy involving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, after intensive treatment and followed by consolidation phase, with elotuzumab, dexamethasone, velcade, and thalidomide in elderly patients. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elotuzumab | Drug |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal response rate Assesment of the International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria | Assesment of the International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria | 1 month after the last consolidation cure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| survival and progression-free survival | Survival rate and global follow-up
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Multiple myeloma de novo.
Stage DS (Durie-Salmon) : III, II, I with at least 1 symptomatic bone lesion (confirmed by radiology).
Age > 65 years
Indication for a first line treatment with induction, stem cell autologous graft and consolidation
Available documentation including cytogenetic and International Staging System (ISS) of the initial diagnosis before inclusion,
Effective contraceptive method for men with a partner of childbearing age during all the treatment period and within 6 months after the last cure
Affiliated to social security
Written informed consent
Willingness and ability to respect the visits and all the demands required by the study
Patient eligible to a high dose chemotherapy and fulfilling the following biological criteria :
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohamad Mohty, PU-PH | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hématologie et thérapie cellulaire, Hôpital Saint Antoine | Paris | 75012 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009101 | Multiple Myeloma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D054219 | Neoplasms, Plasma Cell |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D020141 | Hemostatic Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C546027 | elotuzumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| one year after the last consolidation cure |
| evaluation of the answer to the treatment to improve or maintain the response | Best response obtained or maintained for each therapeutical phase | 12 month of treatment from inclusion |
| Role of the consolidation phase in the improvement or maintenance of the response to the treatment Time before progression | Time before progression | From inclusion to month 36 |
| Conversion from negative residual disease to positive residual disease or maintenance of a negative residual disease during all therapeutical phases | Conversion rate from negative residual disease to positive residual disease or maintenance of a negative residual disease during induction,intensive treatment (IT) with AHSC (autograft of hematopoietic stem cells) and consolidation | from inclusion to month 36 |
| correlation between residual disease and duration of the response to the treatment | Comparison of response duration, overall survival and event-free survival between patients with negative residual disease and the other patients, after the induction phase and at the end of the treatment phase | From inclusion to the end of the 12 treatment-month |
| Tolerance to each phase of treatment (the induction phase, the intensive treatment, the consolidation phase) | Tolerance to each therapeutical phase will be assessed with:
| From inclusion to month 36 |
| D014652 |
| Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010265 | Paraproteinemias |
| D001796 | Blood Protein Disorders |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006474 | Hemorrhagic Disorders |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |