Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical role of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the relationship between the occurrence of breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) and dietary factors in breast cancer survivors who underwent surgical treatments.
Breast cancer survivors are at risk of complications of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) after surgical treatments, which may negatively effect on the quality of life of breast cancer survivors. Lymphedema has been clinically diagnosed by determining that a limb is in fact swollen, and has arbitrarily been diagnosed in other etiologies. Limb circumference differences of 2 cm, a 200 mL or more in limb, or a 5% volume change are some of the objective ways that clinicians use to diagnose lymphedema. Although the arm circumference measurement method is a simple and frequently used clinical method, there is a disadvantage that the standardized reference point does not exist, the extracellular space can not be measured, and the sensitivity is also low. The lack of evidence-based diagnostic criteria to define lymphedema has presented tremendous difficulty in diagnosing lymphedema. It is important to define such criteria for early detection and treatment of lymphedema. Because of these limitations, many researchers are studying various methods for diagnosing lymphadenopathy and methods of bioelectrical impedance have been studied, recently.
Bioelectrical Impedance predicts body composition using the difference of electric conductivity by flowing a minute current to human body.This principle is used to diagnose the occurrence of lymphatic edema. In several studies, the single-frequency bioimpedance analysis (SFBIA) of the two arms obtained from bioelectrical impedance measurements was expressed as the ratio of the values of the operated and non-operated arms. However, it has not yet been clarified as a diagnostic method. Therefore, more studies are needed to establish a diagnosis method and a prediction method of lymphatic edema.
Various risk factors of lymphedema such as axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and obesity have been studied for early prevention. However, there are no studies on the relationship between breast cancer related lymphedema, and dietary factors in breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnosis of lymphedema with the measurement of the arm circumference and the diagnosis of lymphedema through bioelectrical impedance values in order to clarify the clinical role of bioelectrical impedance method as a diagnostic method of lymphedema. To investigate the relationship between dietary factors, which are considered to be related to the occurrence of lymphedema, the investigators examined the frequency of dietary intake and analyzed the relationship between dietary factors and lymphatic edema.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| presence of BCRL | presence of breast cancer related lymphedema after surgical treatment using Inbody 720 and arm circumference measurement |
| |
| absence of BCRL | absence of breast cancer related lymphedema after surgical treatment using Inbody 720 and arm circumference measurement |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inbody 720 | Diagnostic Test | We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer related lymphedema diagnosed by bioimpedance analysis (Inbody 720) and arm circumference measurement.. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Brest cancer related lymphedema | Assessed by measuring the circumference at 15.0 centimeter below the acromion process in both arm and circumference difference of greater than or equal to 2.0 centimeter. | At least six months after the surgical treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| BIA | bioelectrical impedance values | At least six months after the surgical treatment |
| SFBIA ratio | single frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study was conducted on women who were followed up at Severance Hospital for breast cancer survivors aged 20 years or older. Unilateral breast cancer patients at least 6 months after surgery were selected. They were voluntarily participated. The total number of patients recruited in this study was 250. Of these, 228 patients were enrolled, except for 10 patients with bilateral breast cancer, 10 patients with poor medical records, and 2 patients who did not measure bioelectrical impedance. 228 patients diagnosed lymphedema by arm circumference measurement.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hyung Seok Park, MD | Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yonsei University College of Medicine | Seoul | 120-752 | South Korea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31286884 | Derived | Lim SM, Han Y, Kim SI, Park HS. Utilization of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detection of lymphedema in breast Cancer survivors: a prospective cross sectional study. BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5840-9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000072656 | Breast Cancer Lymphedema |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008209 | Lymphedema |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| At least six months after the surgical treatment |
| BMI | body mass index; weight in kilograms(kg) and height in meter(m) will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2 | At least six months after the surgical treatment |
| WHR | waist-hip ratio; waist circumference in centimeter(cm) and hip circumference in centimeter(cm) will be combined to report WHR in cm/cm | At least six months after the surgical treatment |
| Percent body fat | body fat mass in kilograms(kg) and weight in kilograms(kg) will be combined to report Percent body fat in kg/kg*100 (%) | At least six months after the surgical treatment |
| Nutrient intake analysis | nutrient intake was analyzed by a nutrition analysis program (Can-Pro 5.0) through food frequency questionnaire | At least six months after the surgical treatment |
| D010335 |
| Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |