Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIV-16-01-014366 | Other Identifier | EUDAMED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Particularly in CRT (Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy), limited accessibility of the coronary sinus along with its branches and the mismatch between the region of latest left ventricular (LV) contraction and an adequate epimyocardial vein frequently lead to therapy failure and might even be responsible for the 30 % non-responders, although this aspect has not been thoroughly investigated yet. Further complications such as postoperative micro- (i.e. increased thresholds) or macro-dislodgement (i.e. loss of stimulation success) of the LV electrodes are frequent complications leading to reoperation or a change of strategy. The current transthoracic epimyocardial approach via mini-thoracotomy circumvents the aforesaid obstacles and is regarded as the first-choice alternative approach. Participation in the trial would prevent patients from this invasive, transthoracic approach and at the same time allow the same degree of freedom in lead placement. Risks and complications are in this case comparable to the open surgical approach but with a lower risk of intraoperative rib fracture, postoperative pain with consecutive pulmonary hypo-ventilation and pneumonia.
Apart from the benefit of the single individual, societies benefit will include a much higher responder rate in CRT patients and less lead-associated infections. Thoracotomy with breach of the pleural cavity and single lung ventilation - a procedure that itself bears a high risk for postoperative atelectasis, pleural effusion and infection will be avoided.
In patients on hemo-dialysis and patients who suffer from an infected pacemaker-system, extravascular lead placement should be preferred. Again, the current open, transthoracic epimyocardial approach via mini-thoracotomy is regarded as the first-choice alternative approach.
Aim of this study is the validation of the feasibility of an alternative, minimal-invasive therapy method for implanting a cardiac pacemaker.
Treatment:
Video- assisted pericardioscopic surgery for implanting epimyocardial pacemaker leads
Abridged Operation Protocol:
10 mm skin incision below the xiphoid process, blunt preparation towards the pericardial sac, insertion of the endoscope-carrying trocar, opening of the pericardium with endoscopic forceps, standardised inspection of the pericardial cavity, insertion of the bipolar Stingray® electrode via the endoscope working channel into pericardial space, implantation of the electrode into designated epimyocardial site under endoscopic vision, pacing measurements sensing, impedance, pacing threshold, interventricular delay (in CRT), panoramic fluoroscopy for future controls, retraction of the endoscope/trocar, subcutaneous tunnelling and connection of the respective electrode to:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | StingrayTM, Medtronic® |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| StingrayTM, Medtronic® | Device | Video- assisted pericardioscopic surgery for implanting epimyocardial pacemaker lead model 09090, Medtronic® |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Operative mortality | The mortality will be documented as in the usual clinical routine. | 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Moderate or severe operative complications | Operative complications (e.g. cardiac tamponade, severe bleeding, infection, lead dislodgement, pacing thresholds etc.) will be documented. Reduction of procedure-related postoperative complications, particular pulmonic complications in comparison to thoracotomy:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
This study will include patients who are planned to undergo a pacemaker therapy within their regular medical care and who are eligible for an alternative approach for lead placement (minimal-invasive pericardioscopic surgery):
I. Patients fulfilling current, sophisticated criteria for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) (e.g. patients with symptomatic heart failure independent of functional class, prolonged QRS-duration (especially left bundle branch block), severely depressed systolic left ventricular function), but have a history of failed CRT lead implantation or showed insufficient resynchronization after conventional CRT treatment, OR
II. Haemodialysis patients fulfilling the criteria for an implantation of a cardiac pacemakers due to bradycardiac dysrhythmia, OR
III. Patients suffering from acute pacemaker-lead-infection, who require system-explantation and concomitant implantation of a new system
Further inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nima Hatam, Dr. med. | Contact | +492418089221 | nhatam@ukaachen.de |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nima Hatam, Dr. med. | University Hospital, Aachen | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital RWTH Aachen | Aachen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 52074 | Germany |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 7 days |
| Adverse events | Adverse events will be documented | 12 months |
| Overall survival | Overall survival will be documented as in the usual clinical routine. | 12 months |
| Improvement of ejection mechanism | The acute and long-term effects of left-ventricular epimyocardial lead implantation/stimulation obtained by transthoracic echocardiography 1: Ejection fraction in percent, pre- and postoperative | 12 months |
| Improvement of ventricle coordination | The acute and long-term effects of left-ventricular epimyocardial lead implantation/stimulation obtained by transthoracic echocardiography 2: Inter- and intraventricular delay in miliseconds, pre- and postoperative | 12 months |
| Risk reduction of endocarditis in dialysis/infected patients | As compared to the literature | 12 months |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| D001919 | Bradycardia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided