Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R34DA043422 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This project tests the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the Couples Health Project (CHP). CHP is a brief (3-session) couples-based Motivational Interviewing intervention which addresses drug use and sexual HIV transmission risk among partnered HIV negative YMSM (ages 18-29). The proposed project includes a randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 50 couples who are randomized to complete either the CHP intervention or an attention-matched education control condition.
This study aims to evaluate a couples-based intervention with an integrated focus on drug use and HIV prevention, including uptake of and adherence to PrEP. The investigators will recruit a sample of 50 couples (n = 100 individuals)
Recruitment occurs using a mix of in-person and Internet recruitment. Outreach workers will visit bars and events in the New York City area to recruit participants. Also, information on our project will be posted on social media sites (e.g.,Facebook, Grindr, Scruff). Interested individuals will complete a brief online screener to assess eligibility.
A telephone screener will be conducted with participants who are preliminarily eligible based upon online screener responses. Participants who are eligible based upon telephone screening responses will be sent two emails. The first contains a link for them to access the baseline online survey. The second email is for them to forward to their partner. It provides information which introduces the study to the recruited partner and a link to the baseline survey online. If participants indicate intimate partner violence (IPV) on the online baseline survey, participants will be rendered ineligible. Only the participant that indicated experiencing IPV will be given a list of local referrals to access IPV-related services.
An in-person baseline assessment appointment will be scheduled after both participants have completed the online survey. If participants come to the research site alone, they will need to reschedule the appointment when both partners can attend.
The in-person baseline assessment appointment consists of four components; written consenting, a computer-assisted self interview (CASI), a timeline follow back interview, and biological testing.
Written consent is obtained with each participant individually in separate rooms. Participants additionally complete a computer-assisted self interview (CASI) independently. After this, participants will independently complete a TFLB.
TLFB is a semi-structured interview to collect retrospective event-level data on drug use, sexual behavior and PrEP adherence (for those on PrEP) in the past 30 days. Participants complete the survey and TLFB independently in a different room, without their partner.
The final part of the in-person baseline assessment consists of biological testing for STI (gonorrhea & chlamydia via urinalysis and rectal swabs), drug testing via 5-panel fingernail drug assay via finger or toe nail clippings. Drugs tested are 5 major drugs: Amphetamines, Cannabinoids, Cocaine, Opiates, and Phencyclidine (PCP).
After the baseline assessment, participants will be randomized to receive their first CHP or Education session, of which the first session will occur immediately following their baseline assessment. The study will employ a stratified randomization procedure using an algorithm via Qualtrics. Couples will be randomized using three couple-level criteria. Couples will be randomized based on relationship length difference (less than 2 years versus 2 or more), age difference (less than 3 years versus 3 or more), and racial difference (both white versus all others combinations). Each of the intervention arms consists of 3 sessions that occur once a week for three consecutive weeks.
For Session 3 of the experimental and control conditions, participants complete a Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) session that involves a rapid HIV testing for couples. HIV testing is done via the Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo blood test. The couple undergo HIV testing together and receive the results together.
All participants complete a 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow ups. Follow-up appointments are scheduled with each participant independently (not as a couple). For the 1 month follow up (post baseline assessment), participants will complete an online survey at home for which participants are instructed to take this survey independent from their partner. At the 3 month follow up (post baseline assessment), participants complete a survey with a TLFB and Fingernail specimen collection for drug use at the research office. At the 6 month follow up (post baseline assessment), participants complete a survey with a TLFB and biological specimen collection to test drug use via fingernail sample and Gonorrhea & Chlamydia for STI testing (Urinalysis and Rectal swabs) at the research offices.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Couples Health Project (CHP) | Experimental | The CHP intervention is a three session intervention that occurs once a week for three weeks. The CHP intervention will be delivered by MI-trained mental health counselors. The CHP intervention is comprised of 3 sessions. 25 couples will be allocated to this arm. |
|
| Education | Active Comparator | The Education intervention is a attention-matched control three-session intervention that occurs once a week for three weeks. The education intervention will be delivered by trained health educators. The education intervention is comprised of 3 sessions. 25 couples will be allocated to this arm. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Couples Health Project (CHP) | Behavioral | The CHP intervention focuses on addresses drug use and HIV transmission risk by enhancing dyadic communication skills and motivation to work towards shared health goals. The last session of the CHP intervention consists of a Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) session. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Illicit Drug Use | The self-reported number of illicit drug use instances (not including marijuana) in the past 30 days | Baseline, 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up |
| Number of HIV Transmission Risk Events | The self-reported number of events of condomless anal sex (CAS) with casual partners in the past 30 days | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Marijuana Use | The self-reported number of marijuana drug use instances in the past 30 days | 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Eligibility is based on self-identification of a male birth gender and current self-identification of a male gender identity of both parts of the couple.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tyrel J Starks, PhD | Hunter College of City University of New York | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center for HIV Educational Studies and Training | New York | New York | 10018 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24364800 | Background | Parsons JT, Lelutiu-Weinberger C, Botsko M, Golub SA. A randomized controlled trial utilizing motivational interviewing to reduce HIV risk and drug use in young gay and bisexual men. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Feb;82(1):9-18. doi: 10.1037/a0035311. Epub 2013 Dec 23. | |
| 34297275 | Derived | Starks TJ, Adebayo T, Kyre KD, Millar BM, Stratton MJ Jr, Gandhi M, Ingersoll KS. Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Motivational Interviewing with Sexual Minority Male Couples to Reduce Drug Use and Sexual Risk: The Couples Health Project. AIDS Behav. 2022 Feb;26(2):310-327. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03384-9. Epub 2021 Jul 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
A databank may be used to share data consistent with the NIH resource sharing agreement. The requester will contact the PI of the study and the PI will contact the CUNY Office for Research Compliance per university guidelines for data sharing.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We used an index participant approach to recruit couples. Online recruitment included advertisements on websites and geosocial networking apps for gay, bisexual, trans, and queer people seeking out sexual partners. Also, staff attended bars, nightclubs, and other social events for these populations in the NYC metro area to screen. Through June 2019, eligible index participants were contacted by phone to complete a study specific screener. This was converted to an online survey in July 2019.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Couples Health Project (CHP) | Participants who received the intervention condition, CHP |
| FG001 | Education | Participants who received the attention-matched Education control |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Couples Health Project (CHP) | Participants who received the intervention condition, CHP |
| BG001 | Education | Participants who received the attention-matched Education control |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Illicit Drug Use | The self-reported number of illicit drug use instances (not including marijuana) in the past 30 days | Intent-to-treat population (assigned to either the CHP intervention or Education Control) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Days (in the past 30 days) | Baseline, 3-month follow-up; 6-month follow-up |
|
6 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Couples Health Project (CHP) | Participants who received the intervention condition, CHP |
Not provided
Not provided
This was a pilot study with modest sample size intended to test preliminary efficacy and provide effect size estimates necessary to plan a larger trial. Results warrant replication in research with larger sample size. The sample was recruited from a large urban center and may not be representative of the wider U.S. population of partnered sexual minority men. Due to COVID, the collection of follow-up STI specimen data was curtailed, diminishing our ability to test associations with this outcome.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyrel J. Starks | Hunter College | 212-206-7919 | tstarks@hunter.cuny.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 15, 2019 | Jul 27, 2021 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 1, 2021 | Jun 30, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012309 | Risk-Taking |
| D012725 | Sexual Behavior |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004522 | Educational Status |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012959 | Socioeconomic Factors |
| D011154 | Population Characteristics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Education | Behavioral | The Education intervention consists of a 3-session health education intervention that addresses sexual risk and substance use through a lecture and question and answer format with a male couple. Additionally, the last session of the education intervention consists of a Couples HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC) session. |
|
| 31199341 | Derived | Starks TJ, Feldstein Ewing SW, Lovejoy T, Gurung S, Cain D, Fan CA, Naar S, Parsons JT. Adolescent Male Couples-Based HIV Testing Intervention (We Test): Protocol for a Type 1, Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jun 7;8(6):e11186. doi: 10.2196/11186. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| HIV Status | HIV status of each member of the couple was assessed (self-report for those reporting an HIV-positive status, and verified by HIV test for those reporting an HIV-negative status) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of HIV Transmission Risk Events | The self-reported number of events of condomless anal sex (CAS) with casual partners in the past 30 days | Intent-to-treat population (assigned to either the CHP intervention or Education Control) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Events in the past 30 days | 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Marijuana Use | The self-reported number of marijuana drug use instances in the past 30 days | Intent-to-treat population (assigned to either the CHP intervention or Education Control) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | days out of 30 | 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 56 |
| 0 |
| 56 |
| 0 |
| 56 |
| EG001 | Education | Participants who received the attention-matched Education control | 0 | 44 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 44 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Events at 6-month follow-up |
|
Multi-level models tested whether treatment condition predicted outcome at 6-months, and controlled for the nesting of participants within couples. |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
Model testing whether condition predicted CAS events at 6-months |
| 0.63 |
| Risk Ratio, log |
| -0.18 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.15 |
| 0.78 |
| Superiority |
| Moderation analysis in 3-month follow-up data. The hypothesis that baseline frequency may moderate the effects of treatment at 3-months was evaluated using models incorporating participants' baseline report of the outcome (actor) as well as their partners' report (partner) at Level 1. Interactions among actor and partner baseline scores and treatment condition were also included at Level 1. Additionally, the model controlled for the nesting of participants within couples. | Mixed Models Analysis | Three-way interaction model testing whether baseline rates of CAS (actor and partner) moderated the effect of condition on CAS events at 3-months | 0.42 | Risk Ratio, log | -0.54 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.85 | 0.77 | Superiority |
| Moderation analysis in 6-month follow-up data. The hypothesis that baseline frequency may moderate the effects of treatment at 6-months was evaluated using models incorporating participants' baseline report of the outcome (actor) as well as their partners' report (partner) at Level 1. Interactions among actor and partner baseline scores and treatment condition were also included at Level 1. Additionally, the model controlled for the nesting of participants within couples. | Mixed Models Analysis | Three-way interaction model testing whether baseline rates of CAS (actor and partner) moderated the effect of condition on CAS events at 6-months | 0.02 | Risk Ratio, log | -1.70 | 2-Sided | 95 | -3.14 | -0.27 | Superiority |
| Use at 6-month follow-up |
|
Multi-level models tested whether treatment condition predicted outcome at 6-months, and controlled for the nesting of participants within couples. |
| Mixed Models Analysis |
Model testing whether condition predicted marijuana use at 6-months |
| 0.50 |
| Risk Ratio, log |
| 0.24 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.44 |
| 0.92 |
| Superiority |
| Moderation analysis in 3-month follow-up data. The hypothesis that baseline frequency may moderate the effects of treatment was evaluated using models incorporating participants' baseline report of the outcome (actor) as well as their partners' report (partner) at Level 1. Interactions among actor and partner baseline scores and treatment condition were also included at Level 1. Additionally, the model controlled for the nesting of participants within couples. | Mixed Models Analysis | Three-way interaction model testing whether baseline use moderated the effect of condition on marijuana use at 3-months | 0.910 | Risk Ratio, log | -0.02 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.34 | 0.31 | Superiority |
| Moderation analysis in 6-month follow-up data. The hypothesis that baseline frequency may moderate the effects of treatment was evaluated using models incorporating participants' baseline report of the outcome (actor) as well as their partners' report (partner) at Level 1. Interactions among actor and partner baseline scores and treatment condition were also included at Level 1. Additionally, the model controlled for the nesting of participants within couples. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.11 | Risk Ratio, log | 0.34 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.07 | 0.75 | Superiority |