Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
hospital never sterted on single site laparoscopy
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
robotic single site surgery (R-SSH) is a novel technique, which may be superior to conventional multiport hysterectomy in select patients regarding cosmesis and postoperative pain. We, perform a randomized trial to compare R-SSH with multiport laparoscopic hysterectomy with regard to the postoperative rehabilitation, cosmesis, the operational cost, and the perioperative morbidity.
The study is scheduled to start February 2018 and compares robotic single-site hysterectomy to conventional multiport hysterectomy. Procedures are performed by an experienced two-surgeon team. Patients are randomized to either conventional multiport hysterectomy (N=62) or R-SSH (N=62). Eligibility criteria are the same as for study 1. Patient's satisfaction with body image and cosmesis is assessed at different time points pre- and postoperatively by means of validated cosmesis scales and Body Image Questionnaire. Postoperative pain and analgesia use will be registered as well as secondary outcome parameters as described above. A follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 month include evaluation of the scar and registration of port-site hernias and vaginal dehiscence or other complications. Interviews and diaries will include time of return to home and work, daily activities including sexuality The R-SSH is performed using da Vinci, Xi robotic system. One single port, diameter 2 cm is applied. Applying an additional assistant port is defined conversion of procedure The laparoscopy is performed using our standard equipment and 4 trocars, 5 mm each.
Socio-economical consequences of R-SSH versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy Study details in preparation
Sample size calculation was based a previous study on fast track hysterectomy, which showed a difference in return to work of 4 days. 62 women in each group is needed with standard deviation ±8 and a power of 80%. To include those not working, we calculated that with an expected visual analog pain score of 0.86 ±0.2 and 62 in each group the sample was sufficient to detect of difference of 0.1 in visual analog pain score with a power of 80%. All calculation are based on two-sided testing with alpha of 0.05.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic single-site hysterectomy | Active Comparator | Robotic single-site hysterectomy is performed in this arm |
|
| Multiport Laparoscopy | Active Comparator | Multiport Laparoscopic hysterectomy is performed in this other arm |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic single-site Hysterectomy | Procedure | Robotic assisted Periumbilical single incision hysterectomy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Return-to-work | Time from operation to return work | up to six months after operation or until work is resumed, whichever came first |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain measured by subjective score | Visual analogue pain score with a minimum of '0' up to '10' on a 10 cm continious scale | Visual analogue pain score first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and six months after operation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
women undergoing hysterectomy
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Finn F Lauszus, MD,PhD | Gynecology Department, Herning Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gynecology Dept. Herning Hospital | Herning | 7400 | Denmark |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26992935 | Background | El Hachem L, Andikyan V, Mathews S, Friedman K, Poeran J, Shieh K, Geoghegan M, Gretz HF 3rd. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 15. | |
| 23140831 |
Not provided
Not provided
via meeting, posters, abstracts, and publications
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 12, 2017 | Dec 12, 2017 | Prot_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Dec 12, 2017 | Dec 12, 2017 | ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Women are randomized to either robotic single site or multi port lapsoscopic hystrectomy
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Laparoscopic hysterectomy | Procedure | Multiport laparoscopic hysterectomy |
|
| Golkar FC, Ross SB, Sperry S, Vice M, Luberice K, Donn N, Morton C, Hernandez JM, Rosemurgy AS. Patients' perceptions of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the cosmetic effect. Am J Surg. 2012 Nov;204(5):751-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.026. |
| 28357561 | Background | Sandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, van den Tweel MM, Schoones JW, Jansen FW. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29. |
| 23312246 | Background | Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, Sobolewski C. Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008. |
| 26264829 | Background | Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5. |