Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study was closed due to lack of participants
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Nordsjaellands Hospital | OTHER |
| Reapplix | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The trial compare the healing rate of chronic wounds with exposed tendon or bone ('problematic wound area') with LeucoPatch® treatment for 8 up to 16 weeks in addition to usual care versus usual care.
The healing rate will be measured as relative reduction of 'problematic wound area' at 8 weeks
A certain subpopulation of plastic surgery patients has chronic, non-healing wounds with exposed bone or tendon e.g. located on the scalp or extremities. The chronic non-healing wounds are characterized by no significant wound area reduction within 4 weeks of standard wound treatment. Standard wound treatment includes mechanical or sharp serial debridement and low pressure irrigation for cleansing and wound dressings ensuring moist wound healing. Exposed bone or tendon in a chronic wound can be described as a potentially 'problematic wound area', since the healing by sound granulation tissue from the soft tissue sides of the wound to cover the problematic wound area is often reduced or absent.
The subpopulation is characterized by either referral from other specialties with non-healing wounds of various etiologies and no or limited options of medical, surgical, or reconstructive plastic surgery procedures to treat the wounds; or the wounds are a consequence of previous reconstructive procedures with unsuccessful outcome and no or limited options of further reconstructive surgery. This group of patients often needs wound treatment for a very long period (months-years) to heal, in spite of best practice standards of wound treatment. Treatment with xenogeneic acellular dermal matrixes and autologous full- or split-thickness skin grafts may be an option, but it often requires general anesthesia and a 2-staged approach. The LeucoPatch may be a new solution in wound treatment, which can be used in the outpatient clinic, to promote faster healing in patients with chronic, non-healing wounds with exposed bone or tendon
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| LeucoPatch® | Active Comparator | Usual wound care and LeucoPatch® treatment for 8 weeks, with the offer of additional 8 weeks treatment with LeucoPatch® |
|
| Control | Placebo Comparator | Usual wound care for 8 weeks, with the offer of 8 weeks of LeucoPatch® treatment after the first 8 weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LeucoPatch® | Device | LeucoPatch® is an elastic membrane produced by the patients own venous blood by centrifugation, and one or two is placed on the wound once a week The LeucoPatch® consist of the fibrin Leucocytes and growth factors from the patients own blood |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Healing rate of Problematic wound area | Measured as relative reduction of Problematic wound area | 8 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Complete 'problematic wound area´coverage | Full coverage with granulation tissue of the 'Problematic wound area´ making split -thickness-skin-transplantation for full wound coverage possible | 8 weeks or until 16 weeks |
| Complete healing of target wound |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lise Tarnow, Professor | Nordsjaellands Hospital | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herlev - Gentofte Hospital | Herlev | Regionh | 2730 | Denmark |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
observer blinded, randomised, controlled study
Not provided
Not provided
A blinded assessor will evaluate wound healing at the first woundhealing and 2 weeks after woundhealing
| Control, | Other | Usual wound care in a specialized clinic |
|
Defined as confirmed confirmed wound closure of target wound i.e. skin reepithelization without drainage or dressing requirements (sustained for 2 weeks) |
| 8 or until 16 weeks |
| Time to complete healing or coverage with granulation tissue | Defined as time from randomisation to first study visit with confirmed healing or coverage with granulation tissue | until 16 weeks |
| Long -term followup | Occurence of complete healing 36 weeks after randomisation | 36 weeks |
| Local pain | Local pain measured with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS ) | 8 to 16 weeks |
| Safety | Data on adverse events and serious adverse events including major clinical events will be compared between treatment groups as will changes in haemoglobin | 16 weeks |