Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
the initial design of the novel oral appliance proved uncomfortable and thus terminated trial after three subjects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Mandibular advancing oral appliances (OAm) are an effective and increasingly common treatment modality for the management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adults.
The effectiveness of OAm therapy, however, is dependent on a high level of patient adherence, which may be negatively impacted by treatment side effects - the most significant of which are occlusal changes and tooth movement.
The proposed pilot study will evaluate the efficacy of a novel implant supported OAm in 10 OSA patients who have already been successfully treated with a traditional OAm.
The study will compare OSA specific outcomes with traditional OAm use against novel oral appliance use after one month. This study could potentially validate the novel design features of an effective treatment option for OSA that does not result in tooth movement, which is a significant side effect shared by all existing OAm devices.
Ultimately, this study could lead to increased treatment adherence and better OSA patient health outcomes in the future.
Mandibular advancement oral appliances (OAm) are devices that keep the airway open during sleep by pulling the lower jaw forward. OAm have been shown to be an effective treatment for both mild and severe OSA. OSA is a chronic disease and there is no cure. OSA treatments depend on high patient adherence for long term effectiveness.
Currently marketed OAm devices attach to the teeth as a way of holding the jaw in position. However, attaching directly to the teeth causes unwanted tooth movement with long term OAm use. As a result, some long-term users of OAm have stopped treatment due to a decrease in quality of life caused by tooth movement. Accordingly, the changes in tooth position can be seen as a limitation of the existing appliances. For this reason, there is a strong need for a type of treatment that can effectively pull the jaw forward without causing movement of the teeth, which is inevitable with the way the current OAm devices work.
This trial is a pilot study to find out if a novel OAm device is an effective treatment for OSA. The novel OAm device does not contact the teeth directly but instead attaches to orthodontic mini implants (OMIs) in the jaw. 10 OSA patients who have previously been successfully treated with a traditional OAm appliance will be fitted with the novel oral appliance. Participants will be fitted with 6 OMIs following standard practice and the bespoke oral appliance will be manufactured and delivered to the patient for use.
Prior to receiving treatment, participants will undergo a baseline assessment where demographic, anthropometric, and specific periodontal health data will be collected. Daytime sleepiness will be assessed and at-home sleep test will be used to establish baseline sleep parameters with the existing appliance.
Follow up sleep tests will be completed 1 month after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. ESS questionnaires and treatment experience interviews will be completed at 1 month and 4 months after the start of treatment with the new appliance. Treatment adherence and OMI side effects will be monitored throughout the study. Patients will be given the option of continuing treatment with the novel device or having the implants removed and returning to treatment with their previous OAm.
To directly address the primary aim of this study, OSA related parameters will be measured by a combination of methods including at-home sleep tests and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaires. Secondary outcome variables to assess treatment adherence and satisfaction include self-reported adherence data using sleep diaries, experience interviews and assessing OMI side effects throughout the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Group | Experimental | Participants will be treated with a novel experimental implant supported mandibular advancement oral appliance, which uniquely attaches to orthodontic mini implants (OMIs) in the jaw. Participants will be fitted with OMIs per standard clinical practice prior to treatment with the novel oral appliance. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implant Supported Mandibular Advancement Oral Appliance | Device | This device is a novel oral appliance that attached to orthodontic mini implants in the jaw and is designed to keep the jaw in an advanced position, opening the upper airway during sleep. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) | Indication of the severity of sleep apnea. The AHI is calculated by dividing the number of apnea events by the number of hours of sleep. This outcome will assess the change in AHI over time. | Data collected at 0, and 1 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Daytime Sleepiness | Evaluation of OSA specific fatigue using Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire. ESS measures daytime sleepiness via 8 questions that ask about daytime sleepiness during common everyday conditions. The potential range of scores for any questions is from 0 to 3. Higher values represent worse outcomes. Their are no subscales for ESS. The answers to the questions are all summed up. Total score ranges between 0 and 24. A score above 10 indicates daytime sleepiness with higher scores indicating more sleepiness. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
This trial will recruit 10 patients with an objective diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea who are not naïve to treatment. The inclusion criteria are:
Exclusion Criteria:
The patient is excluded if it meets any of the following criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Benjamin T Pliska, DDS | University British Columbia | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of British Columbia | Vancouver | British Columbia | V6T 1Z3 | Canada |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020181 | Sleep Apnea, Obstructive |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012891 | Sleep Apnea Syndromes |
| D001049 | Apnea |
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Orthodontic Mini Implant | Device | Small titanium devices that are fixed to the bone for the purpose of enhancing anchorage of other orthodontic devices. |
|
|
| Data collected at 0, 1, and 4 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| Arterial Oxygen Saturation | Using a pulse oximeter to determine the percentage of hemoglobin binding sites in the bloodstream occupied by oxygen. | Data collected at 0, 1, and 4 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| Treatment Adherence | Self-reported use of the appliance by recording the number of hours per night and the number of nights per week that the appliance is used. | Data will be collected by the research team 4 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| Patient Experience | Subjective patient experience data collected from semi-structured interviews. | Data collected 1 and 4 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| Mini Implant Side Effects - Mobility | Using tactile assessment to determine implant mobility per Ngiam et al. Mobility will be graded from 0-2 depending on severity. 0 represents no mobility whereas 2 represents mobility greater than 1mm. There is an additional option for total mobility or implant loss. | Data collected at 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| Mini Implant Side Effects - Gingival Irritation | Gingival irritation will be determined using tactile/visual assessment. Irritation will be scored as either YES (present) or NO (absent). | Data collected at 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| Mini Implant Side Effects - Soreness | Soreness will be determined using tactile/visual assessment and self-reported by patients. Soreness will be scored as either YES (present) or NO (absent). | Data collected at 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| Mini Implant Side Effects - Jaw Pain | Jaw pain will be determined using tactile/visual assessment and self-reported by patients. Jaw pain will be scored as either YES (present) or NO (absent). | Data collected at 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| Mini Implant Side Effects - Excess Salivation | Excess salivation will be determined using visual assessment and self-reported by patients. Excess salivation will be scored as either YES (present) or NO (absent). | Data collected at 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| Mini Implant Side Effects - Other | A brief description of any other side effects will be self-reported by patients. | Data collected at 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after initiation of treatment with the new appliance. |
| D020919 |
| Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic |
| D020920 | Dyssomnias |
| D012893 | Sleep Wake Disorders |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |