Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients intubated due to acute respiratory failure have a high risk of infectious complications, airway injuries and multiple organic failure, so performing a successful extubation from mechanical ventilation is key. Between 10 and 20% of patients develop extubation failure, which is related to an increased in-hospital death rate, infections, higher costs and longer hospital stays. High-flow nasal oxygen therapy delivers heated, humidified air at flows up to 60L/min, and an oxygen concentration close to 100%, providing a fresh air reservoir at the naseo-pharyngeal level, evening out the peak inspiratory flow rate of the patient, improving air conductance, promoting secretion management, increasing end-expiratory lung volume, and applying a positive end-expiratory pressure. Such effects result in decreased breathing work, dyspnea relief, improved use tolerance, increased oxygenation, and lower fraction of inspired oxygen in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. High-flow oxygen therapy has recently been described to decrease extubation failure in a group of patients classified with low failure risk, in comparison to Venturi mask, and it was not inferior to non-invasive mechanical ventilation in high risk patients. However, it is worth pointing out that a large percentage of the patients included in such studies did not develop acute respiratory failure primarily.
Given the beneficial effects described above, the investigators hypothesize that high-flow nasal oxygen therapy decreases the risk of extubation failure in a group of patients that required invasive mechanical ventilation due to primary acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
Intubated patients recovering from primary acute hypoxemic respiratory failure who have passed a spontaneous breathing trial will be included in the study. Following extubation, patients will be randomized assigned to one of two study groups. Heart rate, breathing rate, median arterial pressure, FiO2, SpO2, and dyspnea and comfort levels will be measured at defined intervals after extubation (basal, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours). An arterial blood gas test will be performed 60 minutes and 24 hours after extubation. The number of patients fulfilling certain preset criteria regarding extubation failure will be determined.
Extubation failure shall be defined as the need for using invasive mechanical ventilation again within two days following extubation based on the criteria below:
Patients who do not fulfill the extubation failure criteria after the first 48 hours of admission may receive extra supplementary oxygen through any device (e.g., nasal cannula, face mask, reservoir mask, etc.). Every day, SpO2 will be measured and the moment when the patient reaches SpO2 >94% with no need for oxygen will be determined.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-flow nasal oxygen | Experimental | Randomized patients will receive oxygen through a high flow nasal device capable of delivering humidified, heated air at an output rate of 40 L/min |
|
| Conventional oxygen | Active Comparator | Randomized patients will receive oxygen through a Venturi mask at an air flow of 15 L/min |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-flow nasal oxygen | Device | Randomized patients will receive oxygen through a high nasal flow device capable of delivering humidified, heated air at an output rate of 40 L/min |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Post-extubation failure | Number of patients with extubation failure criteria in each group | First 48 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Record. | An arterial blood gas test will be performed once the high-flow oxygen or Venturi mask is placed. | Post-extubation period and up to 48 hours later. |
| Determination of FiO2 Requirements. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Hypoxemic primary acute respiratory failure
Invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours
Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trial
Exclusion Criteria:
Immediate indication for invasive mechanical ventilation
Immediate indication for non-invasive mechanical ventilation
Self-extubation
One or more failed Spontaneous Breathing Trial
Chronic respiratory failure
Neuromuscular diseases
Tracheostomy.
Nasal cavity pathology
Facial surgery
Failure to authorize the informed consent
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jose de Jesus Rodriguez-Andoney, MD | National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, | México | 14080 | Mexico |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19294365 | Result | Chanques G, Constantin JM, Sauter M, Jung B, Sebbane M, Verzilli D, Lefrant JY, Jaber S. Discomfort associated with underhumidified high-flow oxygen therapy in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jun;35(6):996-1003. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1456-x. Epub 2009 Mar 18. | |
| 19467849 | Result | Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH. Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med. 2009 Oct;103(10):1400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 May 21. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Venturi mask | Device | Randomized patients will receive oxygen through a Venturi mask at an air flow of 15 L/min |
|
Assessment of FiO2 requirements at the time of extubation (when high-flow oxygen or Venturi mask is placed) and then at 60 minutes, 2 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours. The aim is to maintain SpO2 levels > 94% with the minimal FiO2 possible.
| Post-extubation period and up to 48 hours later. |
| Respiratory Rate Record at Defined Intervals. | Quantification of respiratory rate at the time of placement high-flow oxygen or Venturi mask and then at 60 minutes, 2 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours. | Post-extubation period and up to 48 hours later. |
| Heart Rate Record at Defined Intervals. | Quantification of heart rate at the time of placement high-flow oxygen or Venturi mask and then at 60 minutes, 2 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours. | Post-extubation period and up to 48 hours later. |
| Mean Arterial Pressure Record at Defined Intervals. | Quantification of mean arterial pressure at the time of placement high-flow oxygen or Venturi mask and then at 60 minutes, 2 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours. | Post-extubation period and up to 48 hours later. |
| Treatment Comfort Assessment by means of a Visual Analogue Scale at Defined Intervals. | To record patient comfort by means of a Visual Analogue Scale tool at the time of placement high-flow oxygen or Venturi mask and then at 60 minutes, 2 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours. Visual Analogue Scale range (0 = better to 10 = worse). | Post-extubation period and up to 48 hours later. |
| Dyspnea Assessment by means of a Visual Analog Scale at Defined Intervals. | To measure the level of dyspnea by means of a Visual Analogue Scale tool at the time of placement high-flow oxygen or Venturi mask and then at 60 minutes, 2 hours, 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours. Visual Analogue Scale range (0 = better to 10 = worse). | Post-extubation period and up to 48 hours later. |
| Number of Days Requiring Oxygen after Successful Extubation | After successful extubation, the level of SpO2 will be measured on a daily basis, recording the time when a level of SpO2> 94% is reached by the patient without the use of supplemental oxygen. | Post-extubation period and up to 14 days later. |
| Number of Days Spent in the ICU after Extubation. | There will be quantified the total length of stay in the ICU after extubation. | Post-extubation period and up to 28 days later. |
| Days Spent in the Hospital After Extubation. | There will be quantified the total length of stay in the hospital after extubation. | Post-extubation period and up to 28 days later |
| Number of Deaths in the ICU after Extubation. | There will be quantified the number of patients deceased in each group | Post-extubation period and up to 28 days later |
| Number of Deaths in the Hospital after Extubation. | There will be quantified the number of patients deceased in each group | Post extubation period and up to 28 days later. |
| 8162725 | Result | Dewan NA, Bell CW. Effect of low flow and high flow oxygen delivery on exercise tolerance and sensation of dyspnea. A study comparing the transtracheal catheter and nasal prongs. Chest. 1994 Apr;105(4):1061-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.4.1061. |
| 22531566 | Result | Ricard JD. High flow nasal oxygen in acute respiratory failure. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Jul;78(7):836-41. Epub 2012 Apr 24. |
| 17931878 | Result | Groves N, Tobin A. High flow nasal oxygen generates positive airway pressure in adult volunteers. Aust Crit Care. 2007 Nov;20(4):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Oct 10. |
| 21908497 | Result | Corley A, Caruana LR, Barnett AG, Tronstad O, Fraser JF. Oxygen delivery through high-flow nasal cannulae increase end-expiratory lung volume and reduce respiratory rate in post-cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107(6):998-1004. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer265. Epub 2011 Sep 9. |
| 17762844 | Result | Spence KL, Murphy D, Kilian C, McGonigle R, Kilani RA. High-flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants. J Perinatol. 2007 Dec;27(12):772-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211828. Epub 2007 Aug 30. |
| 22988501 | Result | Chidekel A, Zhu Y, Wang J, Mosko JJ, Rodriguez E, Shaffer TH. The effects of gas humidification with high-flow nasal cannula on cultured human airway epithelial cells. Pulm Med. 2012;2012:380686. doi: 10.1155/2012/380686. Epub 2012 Sep 3. |
| 11331690 | Result | Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics. 2001 May;107(5):1081-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.1081. |
| 20406507 | Result | Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans JR. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2010 Apr;55(4):408-13. |
| 25003980 | Result | Maggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, Montini L, De Gaetano A, Navalesi P, Antonelli M. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;190(3):282-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC. |
| 22417844 | Result | Lenglet H, Sztrymf B, Leroy C, Brun P, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD. Humidified high flow nasal oxygen during respiratory failure in the emergency department: feasibility and efficacy. Respir Care. 2012 Nov;57(11):1873-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01575. Epub 2012 Mar 13. |
| 26975498 | Result | Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Gonzalez P, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2711. |
| 27706464 | Result | Hernandez G, Vaquero C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Gonzalez P, Canabal A, Sanchez S, Rodriguez ML, Villasclaras A, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1565-1574. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14194. |