The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression or Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HDRS-24) is a 24-item clinician-administered multiple-choice measure of depression symptom severity. The scale consists of 24 items that assess various aspects of depression, including mood, guilt, insomnia, agitation, and anxiety. Participants are rated on each item based on the presence and severity of symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4. The first 17 items measure the severity of depressive symptoms, and the scores from those 17 items are combined to create a total score (52 max). Higher total scores on the HDRS-24 indicate more severe depression, with ranges typically interpreted as follows: 0-7 (normal), 8-13 (mild depression), 14-18 (moderate depression), 19-22 (sever depression) and 23 or higher (very severe depression). The sum of the scores from all 24 items results in the highest possible score being 78.

The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression or Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HDRS-28) is a 28-item clinician-administered multiple-choice measure of depression symptom severity. The scale consists of 28 items that assess various aspects of depression, including mood, guilt, insomnia, agitation, and anxiety. Participants are rated on each item based on the presence and severity of symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4. The first 17 items measure the severity of depressive symptoms, and the scores from those 17 items are combined to create a total score (52 max). Higher total scores on the HDRS-28 indicate more severe depression, with ranges typically interpreted as follows: 0-7 (normal), 8-13 (mild depression), 14-18 (moderate depression), 19-22 (Sever depression) and 23 or higher (very severe depression). The sum of the scores from all 28 items results in the total score, with the highest possible score being 84.

The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a clinical assessment tool used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals diagnosed with depression. The scale consists of 10 items that assess various symptoms of depression, including apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep disturbances, and reduced appetite. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The total score on the MADRS ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores reflecting greater severity of depression. Interpretation of MADRS scores is as follows: 0-6 (normal), 7-19 (mild depression), 20-34 (moderate depression), and 35 or higher (severe depression).

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) consists of 14 items, each of which assesses a different symptom of anxiety. These items cover both psychological and physical manifestations of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the absence of the symptom and 4 indicating severe or disabling symptoms. The total score can range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.

The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) is a clinical assessment tool designed to measure the severity of manic symptoms in individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder. The scale consists of an 11-item scale used to assess the severity of manic states, including elevated mood, increased energy levels, irritability, impulsivity, and grandiosity. Four items are graded on a scale of 0 to 8 (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior), while the remaining seven items are graded on a scale of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicating more severe manic symptoms. The total score on the YMRS ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores reflecting greater severity of mania. Interpretation of YMRS scores is as follows: 0-12 (normal), 13-20 (mild mania), 21-35 (moderate mania), and 36 or higher (severe mania).

The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals aged 13 and older. The scale consists of 21 items that measure various symptoms of depression, such as mood, pessimism, guilt, and physical symptoms. Participants rate each item based on how they have been feeling over the past two weeks, with scores ranging from 0 to 3. Higher total scores on the BDI-II indicate more severe depressive symptoms, with ranges typically interpreted as follows: 0-13 (minimal depression), 14-19 (mild depression), 20-28 (moderate depression), and 29-63 (severe depression).

The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (QIDS-SR) is a clinical assessment tool used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals diagnosed with depression. The scale consists of 16 items that assess nine criterion symptom domains of depression according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria. Participants rate each item based on how they have been feeling over the past seven days, with scores ranging from 0 to 3 or 0 to 4. Higher total scores on the QIDS-SR indicate more severe depressive symptoms, with ranges typically interpreted as follows: 0-5 (no depression), 6-10 (mild depression), 11-15 (moderate depression), 16-20 (severe depression), and 21-27 (very severe depression).

The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a single-item mental health status measure which assesses how much a person's symptoms affect their day-to-day life on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicating better overall functioning.

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate the severity of suicidal ideation and behavior in individuals. The scale consists of several items that assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and the severity of suicidal intent. Scores on the C-SSRS are not summed to provide a total score; instead, each item is scored individually to assess presence, frequency, and severity of suicidal thoughts or actions.

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a standardized assessment tool used to provide a global evaluation of illness severity and treatment response in individuals with mental health disorders. The CGI consists of two main scales: the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. CGI-Scale: The CGI-S scale is used to assess the severity of illness at a specific point in time. The range of responses for the Severity of Illness section of the CGI are: Normal, not at all ill, Borderline mentally ill, Mildly ill, Moderately ill, Markedly ill, Severely ill, Among the most extremely ill patients. This outcome measure reports the number of participants for whom data was available and the specific response for this section of the CGI.

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a standardized assessment tool used to provide a global evaluation of illness severity and treatment response in individuals with mental health disorders. The CGI consists of two main scales: the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. CGI-Scale: The CGI-I scale is used to assess the overall improvement or change in symptoms over time in response to treatment. The range of responses for the CGI-I are: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. This outcome measure reports the number of participants for whom data was available and the specific response for this section of the CGI.

The Patient Global Impression (PGI) is a self-reported assessment tool used to measure the overall severity of illness or improvement in symptoms from the patient's perspective. The potential responses to the PGI are Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse, Very Much Worse. This outcome measure reports the number of participants for whom data was available.

The potential responses to the Patient Global Impressions of Severity scale are Normal, not at all ill, Borderline mentally ill , Mildly ill, Moderately ill, Markedly ill, Severely ill, Among the most extremely ill patients. This outcome measure reports the number of participants for whom data was available and the specific response for this section of the PGI

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) is a 17-item clinician-administered depression assessment scale pertaining to symptoms of depression experienced over the past week. For the HDRS-17, a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range., a score of 8-12: Possible depression, a score of 13-17: Mild depression, a score of 18-24: Moderate depression, a score of 25-52: Severe depression.

In year 1, confirmation of psychiatrist oversight or completion of assessment could not be verified for 3 of 5 participants. One participant had device explanted after year 1 and no data was collected for this participant thereafter. Data for 2 of 4 participants were not collected utilizing this tool after year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected utilizing this assessment after year 2.

The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression or Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HDRS-21) is a 21-item clinician-administered multiple-choice measure of depression symptom severity. The scale consists of 21 items assessing various aspects of depression, including mood, guilt, insomnia, agitation & anxiety. Participants are rated on each item based on the presence & severity of symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4. The first 17 items measure the severity of depressive symptoms & the scores from those 17 items are combined to create a total score (52 max). Higher total scores indicate more severe depression, with ranges typically interpreted as follows: a score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (Minimal or no depression), a score of 8-13: Mild depression, a score of 14-18: Moderate depression, a score of 19-22: Severe depression, a score of 23 and above: very severe depression. The sum of all 21 items results in highest possible score of 76.

In year 1, confirmation of psychiatrist oversight or completion of assessment could not be verified for 3 of 5 participants. One participant had device explanted after year 1 and no data was collected for this participant thereafter. Data for 2 of 4 participants were not collected utilizing this tool after year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected utilizing this assessment after year 2.

The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression or Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HDRS-24) is a 24-item clinician-administered multiple-choice measure of depression symptom severity. The scale consists of 24 items that assess various aspects of depression, including mood, guilt, insomnia, agitation, and anxiety. Participants are rated on each item based on the presence and severity of symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4. The first 17 items measure the severity of depressive symptoms, and the scores from those 17 items are combined to create a total score (52 max). Higher total scores on the HDRS-24 indicate more severe depression, with ranges typically interpreted as follows: 0-7 (normal), 8-13 (mild depression), 14-18 (moderate depression), 19-22 (sever depression) and 23 or higher (very severe depression). The sum of the scores from all 24 items results in the highest possible score being 78.

In year 1, confirmation of psychiatrist oversight or completion of assessment could not be verified for 3 of 5 participants. One participant had device explanted after year 1 and no data was collected for this participant thereafter. Data for 2 of 4 participants were not collected utilizing this tool after year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected utilizing this assessment after year 2.

The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression or Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HDRS-28) is a 28-item clinician-administered multiple-choice measure of depression symptom severity. The scale consists of 28 items that assess various aspects of depression, including mood, guilt, insomnia, agitation, and anxiety. Participants are rated on each item based on the presence and severity of symptoms, with scores ranging from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4. The first 17 items measure the severity of depressive symptoms, and the scores from those 17 items are combined to create a total score (52 max). Higher total scores on the HDRS-28 indicate more severe depression, with ranges typically interpreted as follows: 0-7 (normal), 8-13 (mild depression), 14-18 (moderate depression), 19-22 (Sever depression) and 23 or higher (very severe depression). The sum of the scores from all 28 items results in the total score, with the highest possible score being 84.

In year 1, confirmation of psychiatrist oversight or completion of assessment could not be verified for 3 of 5 participants. One participant had device explanted after year 1 and no data was collected for this participant thereafter. Data for 2 of 4 participants were not collected utilizing this tool after year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected utilizing this assessment after year 2.

The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a clinical assessment tool used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals diagnosed with depression. The scale consists of 10 items that assess various symptoms of depression, including apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep disturbances, and reduced appetite. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The total score on the MADRS ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores reflecting greater severity of depression. Interpretation of MADRS scores is as follows: 0-6 (normal), 7-19 (mild depression), 20-34 (moderate depression), and 35 or higher (severe depression).

In year 1, confirmation of psychiatrist oversight or completion of assessment could not be verified for 3 of 5 participants. One participant had device explanted after year 1 and no data was collected for this participant thereafter. Data for 2 of 4 participants were not collected utilizing this tool after year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected utilizing this assessment after year 2.

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) consists of 14 items, each of which assesses a different symptom of anxiety. These items cover both psychological and physical manifestations of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the absence of the symptom and 4 indicating severe or disabling symptoms. The total score can range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.

1 of 5 participants did not have this data collected at any time. In year 1, confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 3 of 4 participants. After year 1, data for 2 participants were not collected. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected after year 2.

The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) is a clinical assessment tool designed to measure the severity of manic symptoms in individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder. The scale consists of an 11-item scale used to assess the severity of manic states, including elevated mood, increased energy levels, irritability, impulsivity, and grandiosity. Four items are graded on a scale of 0 to 8 (irritability, speech, thought content, and disruptive/aggressive behavior), while the remaining seven items are graded on a scale of 0 to 4. Higher scores indicating more severe manic symptoms. The total score on the YMRS ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores reflecting greater severity of mania. Interpretation of YMRS scores is as follows: 0-12 (normal), 13-20 (mild mania), 21-35 (moderate mania), and 36 or higher (severe mania).

1 of 5 participants did not have this data collected at any time. In year 1, confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 3 of 4 participants. After year 1, data for 2 participants were not collected. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected after year 2.

The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals aged 13 and older. The scale consists of 21 items that measure various symptoms of depression, such as mood, pessimism, guilt, and physical symptoms. Participants rate each item based on how they have been feeling over the past two weeks, with scores ranging from 0 to 3. Higher total scores on the BDI-II indicate more severe depressive symptoms, with ranges typically interpreted as follows: 0-13 (minimal depression), 14-19 (mild depression), 20-28 (moderate depression), and 29-63 (severe depression).

1 of 5 participants did not have this data collected at any time. In year 1, confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 3 of 4 participants. After year 1, data for 2 participants were not collected. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected after year 2.

The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self Report (QIDS-SR) is a clinical assessment tool used to measure the severity of depressive symptoms in individuals diagnosed with depression. The scale consists of 16 items that assess nine criterion symptom domains of depression according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria. Participants rate each item based on how they have been feeling over the past seven days, with scores ranging from 0 to 3 or 0 to 4. Higher total scores on the QIDS-SR indicate more severe depressive symptoms, with ranges typically interpreted as follows: 0-5 (no depression), 6-10 (mild depression), 11-15 (moderate depression), 16-20 (severe depression), and 21-27 (very severe depression).

In year 1 confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 3 of 5 participants. 1 participant had device explanted after year 1 & no data was collected thereafter. Data for 2 of 4 participants were not collected utilizing this tool after yr 1. In year 2 confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants. Data for 1 of 2 participants were not collected after yr 2. No data was collected after yr 3.

The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a single-item mental health status measure which assesses how much a person's symptoms affect their day-to-day life on a scale of 0 to 100. Higher scores indicating better overall functioning.

3 of 5 participants enrolled in this study did not have this data collected at any time. In year 1, confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants. Data for one participant was not collected utilizing this assessment tool after year 1. No data was collected after the second year for the entire cohort utilizing this assessment tool.

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a clinical assessment tool used to evaluate the severity of suicidal ideation and behavior in individuals. The scale consists of several items that assess suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and the severity of suicidal intent. Scores on the C-SSRS are not summed to provide a total score; instead, each item is scored individually to assess presence, frequency, and severity of suicidal thoughts or actions.

1 of 5 participants did not have this data collected at any time. 1 of 4 participants did not have this data collected in yr 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 3 participants in yr 1. 1 participant had device explanted and data for 1 of 3 participants were not collected after yr 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for yr 2. No data was collected after yr 2.

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a standardized assessment tool used to provide a global evaluation of illness severity and treatment response in individuals with mental health disorders. The CGI consists of two main scales: the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. CGI-Scale: The CGI-S scale is used to assess the severity of illness at a specific point in time. The range of responses for the Severity of Illness section of the CGI are: Normal, not at all ill, Borderline mentally ill, Mildly ill, Moderately ill, Markedly ill, Severely ill, Among the most extremely ill patients. This outcome measure reports the number of participants for whom data was available and the specific response for this section of the CGI.

2 of 5 participants did not have this data collected at any time. 1 of 3 participants did not have this data collected in year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants in year 1. Data for 1 of 3 participants were not collected after year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected after year 2.

The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a standardized assessment tool used to provide a global evaluation of illness severity and treatment response in individuals with mental health disorders. The CGI consists of two main scales: the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale and the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale. CGI-Scale: The CGI-I scale is used to assess the overall improvement or change in symptoms over time in response to treatment. The range of responses for the CGI-I are: Very much improved, Much improved, Minimally improved, No change, Minimally worse, Much worse, Very much worse. This outcome measure reports the number of participants for whom data was available and the specific response for this section of the CGI.

2 of 5 participants did not have this data collected at any time. 1 of 3 participants did not have this data collected in year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants in year 1. Data for 1 of 3 participants were not collected after year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected after year 2.

The Patient Global Impression (PGI) is a self-reported assessment tool used to measure the overall severity of illness or improvement in symptoms from the patient's perspective. The potential responses to the PGI are Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse, Very Much Worse. This outcome measure reports the number of participants for whom data was available.

2 of 5 participants did not have this data collected at any time. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 2 of 3 participants in year 1. Data for 1 of 3 participants were not collected after year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected after year 2.

The potential responses to the Patient Global Impressions of Severity scale are Normal, not at all ill, Borderline mentally ill , Mildly ill, Moderately ill, Markedly ill, Severely ill, Among the most extremely ill patients. This outcome measure reports the number of participants for whom data was available and the specific response for this section of the PGI

2 of 5 participants did not have this data collected at any time. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 2 of 3 participants in year 1. Data for 1 of 3 participants were not collected after year 1. Confirmation of psychiatrist oversight/completion of assessment could not be verified for 1 of 2 participants for year 2. No data was collected after year 2.