Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary aim of this clinical investigation is to examine a prototype of a quantitative monitoring instrument that will meet most, if not all, of the clinical requirements.
This is a blinded, single-center, prospective study in patients during surgery, requiring use of neuromuscular blockade. Neurostimulation will be used to monitor objective responses, as per current clinical routine. Data collection of Tetragraph EMG responses will be unavailable to the clinician for clinical decision-making, as per current clinical routine, but will be stored on the interfaced SD card.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TetraGraph | Device | The TetraGraph is a dedicated neuromuscular stimulator / recorder intended to evoke, record, and analyze muscle action potentials during surgical procedures |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary performance assessment of TetraGraph device | Agreement between the mAP and mADM EMG based TOF ratios | Duration of surgery |
| Primary performance assessment of TetraGraph device | Agreement between the mAP and mADM EMG based TOF counts | Duration of surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary performance assessment of TetraGraph device | Correlation between stimulation current and T1 twitch height in the two muscles | Duration of surgery |
| Secondary performance assessment of TetraGraph device |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study population for this study includes patients receiving neuromuscular blocking agents during a surgical procedure.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| J R Renew | Mayo Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic in Florida | Jacksonville | Florida | 32224 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11942873 | Background | Gatke MR, Viby-Mogensen J, Rosenstock C, Jensen FS, Skovgaard LT. Postoperative muscle paralysis after rocuronium: less residual block when acceleromyography is used. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Feb;46(2):207-13. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460216.x. | |
| 16428537 | Background | Cammu G, De Witte J, De Veylder J, Byttebier G, Vandeput D, Foubert L, Vandenbroucke G, Deloof T. Postoperative residual paralysis in outpatients versus inpatients. Anesth Analg. 2006 Feb;102(2):426-9. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000195543.61123.1f. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Comparison of EMG to the quantitative AMG monitor
| Duration of surgery |
| 12456433 | Background | Kim KS, Lew SH, Cho HY, Cheong MA. Residual paralysis induced by either vecuronium or rocuronium after reversal with pyridostigmine. Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1656-60, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00033. |
| 9366929 | Background | Berg H, Roed J, Viby-Mogensen J, Mortensen CR, Engbaek J, Skovgaard LT, Krintel JJ. Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Oct;41(9):1095-1103. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04851.x. |
| 18635478 | Background | Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):130-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1268. |
| 18719436 | Background | Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS, Nisman M. Intraoperative acceleromyographic monitoring reduces the risk of residual neuromuscular blockade and adverse respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesthesiology. 2008 Sep;109(3):389-98. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318182af3b. |
| 21946094 | Background | Murphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Marymont JH, Vender JS, Gray J, Landry E, Gupta DK. Intraoperative acceleromyography monitoring reduces symptoms of muscle weakness and improves quality of recovery in the early postoperative period. Anesthesiology. 2011 Nov;115(5):946-54. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182342840. |
| 20442260 | Background | Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. Epub 2010 May 4. |
| 17197470 | Background | Hemmerling TM, Le N. Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Jan;54(1):58-72. doi: 10.1007/BF03021901. |
| 8394051 | Background | Brull SJ, Silverman DG. Visual and tactile assessment of neuromuscular fade. Anesth Analg. 1993 Aug;77(2):352-5. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199308000-00024. |
| 17635429 | Background | Grayling M, Sweeney BP. Recovery from neuromuscular blockade: a survey of practice. Anaesthesia. 2007 Aug;62(8):806-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05101.x. |
| 18497614 | Background | Claudius C, Viby-Mogensen J. Acceleromyography for use in scientific and clinical practice: a systematic review of the evidence. Anesthesiology. 2008 Jun;108(6):1117-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318173f62f. |
| 17635389 | Background | Fuchs-Buder T, Claudius C, Skovgaard LT, Eriksson LI, Mirakhur RK, Viby-Mogensen J; 8th International Neuromuscular Meeting. Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Aug;51(7):789-808. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01352.x. |
| 2160781 | Background | Connelly NR, Silverman DG, O'Connor TZ, Brull SJ. Subjective responses to train-of-four and double burst stimulation in awake patients. Anesth Analg. 1990 Jun;70(6):650-3. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199006000-00012. |
| 14928082 | Background | CHURCHILL-DAVIDSON HC, RICHARDSON AT. The action of decamethonium iodide (C.10) in myasthenia gravis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1952 May;15(2):129-33. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.15.2.129. No abstract available. |
| 23821356 | Background | Liang SS, Stewart PA, Phillips S. An ipsilateral comparison of acceleromyography and electromyography during recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular block under general anesthesia in humans. Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):373-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182937fc4. Epub 2013 Jul 2. |
| 22813498 | Background | Phillips S, Stewart PA, Freelander N, Heller G. Comparison of evoked electromyography in three muscles of the hand during recovery from non-depolarising neuromuscular blockade. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 Jul;40(4):690-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1204000416. |