SBP and DBP were measured in a seated position with a completely automated device. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Safety Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. This population was based on the treatment the participant received.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Heart rate was measured in a seated position with a completely automated device. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Twelve-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) were obtained using an automated ECG machine to measure PR Interval, QRS Duration, QT Interval, QTcF Interval and QTcB Interval. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following hematology parameters: hemoglobin (Hb), lymphocyte count (Lympho), neutrophil count (Neutro) and platelet count (PC). The laboratory parameters were graded according to National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Only those participants with increase to grade 3 and increase to grade 4 are presented.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following clinical chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (Bil),calcium (Ca), cholesterol (Chol), creatinine (Creat), glucose(Gl), phosphate (Phos), potassium (Pot) and sodium (Sod). The laboratory parameters were graded according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.03. Grade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate; Grade 3: severe or medically significant; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. An increase is defined as an increase in CTCAE grade relative to Baseline grade. Values (Hyper and hypo) for Ca, Gl, Pot, Phos and Sod is presented. Only those participants with increase to grade 3 and increase to grade 4 are presented.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Urine samples were collected to analyze the urinalysis parameter: specific gravity. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine, indicated as ratio of urine density to water density. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Urine samples were collected to analyze the urinalysis parameter: specific gravity. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine, indicated as ratio of urine density to water density. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Urine samples were collected to analyze the urinalysis parameter: specific gravity. Urine specific gravity is a measure of the concentration of solutes in the urine and provides information on the kidney's ability to concentrate urine, indicated as ratio of urine density to water density. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Urine samples were collected to analyze the urinalysis parameter: pH. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acidic pH (5.0 - 6.0). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Urine samples were collected to analyze the urinalysis parameter: pH. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acidic pH (5.0 - 6.0). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Urine samples were collected to analyze the urinalysis parameter: pH. Urine pH is an acid-base measurement. pH is measured on a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 14; values on the scale refer to the degree of alkalinity or acidity. A pH of 7 is neutral. A pH less than 7 is acidic, and a pH greater than 7 is basic. Normal urine has a slightly acidic pH (5.0 - 6.0). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Urine samples were collected to analyze parameters including glucose, occult blood (OB) and protein levels by dipstick. The dipstick test gives results in a semi-quantitative manner, and results for urinalysis parameters can be read as increase to trace, increase to 1+ (low concentrations present), increase to 2+ (moderate concentrations present) and increase to 3+ (high concentrations present) indicating proportional concentrations in the urine sample. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Data for worst-case post-Baseline relative to Baseline is presented.

Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that; results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, other situations judged by physician, is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Number of participants who had SAEs and non-SAEs are presented.

Safety Population

Lower extremity strength was measured as 1-RM on a leg press device. Participants continued with a one set of 5 to 10 repetitions of lifting weights using 40 to 60% of estimated maximum, after warm up. Participants, then lifted progressively heavier weights in steps, with each step separated by an appropriate rest period, until participant could not complete the lift. The last successfully completed lift was recorded as the 1-RM. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated by 100*[(post-dose value minus Baseline value)/ Baseline value]. Adjusted means and standard error (SE) are presented. Analysis Population comprised of the participants in the 'All Participants (all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication)' Population having Baseline and at least one post-Baseline assessment of the treatment the participant was randomized to.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Lower extremity strength was measured as 1-RM on a leg press device. Participants continued with a one set of 5 to 10 repetitions of lifting weights using 40 to 60% of estimated maximum, after warm up. Participants, then lifted progressively heavier weights in steps, with each step separated by an appropriate rest period, until participant could not complete the lift. The last successfully completed lift was recorded as the 1-RM. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated by 100*[(post-dose value minus Baseline value)/ Baseline value]. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Lower extremity strength was measured as 1-RM on a leg press device. Participants continued with a one set of 5 to 10 repetitions of lifting weights using 40 to 60% of estimated maximum, after warm up. Participants, then lifted progressively heavier weights in steps, with each step separated by an appropriate rest period, until participant could not complete the lift. The last successfully completed lift was recorded as the 1-RM. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Percentage change from Baseline was calculated by 100*[(post-dose value minus Baseline value)/ Baseline value]. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Lower extremity strength was measured as 1-RM on a leg press device. Participants continued with a one set of 5 to 10 repetitions of lifting weights using 40 to 60% of estimated maximum, after warm up. Participants, then lifted progressively heavier weights in steps, with each step separated by an appropriate rest period, until participant could not complete the lift. The last successfully completed lift was recorded as the 1-RM. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Lower extremity strength was measured as 1-RM on a leg press device. Participants continued with a one set of 5 to 10 repetitions of lifting weights using 40 to 60% of estimated maximum, after warm up. Participants, then lifted progressively heavier weights in steps, with each step separated by an appropriate rest period, until participant could not complete the lift. The last successfully completed lift was recorded as the 1-RM. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Lower extremity strength was measured as 1-RM on a leg press device. Participants continued with a one set of 5 to 10 repetitions of lifting weights using 40 to 60% of estimated maximum, after warm up. Participants, then lifted progressively heavier weights in steps, with each step separated by an appropriate rest period, until participant could not complete the lift. The last successfully completed lift was recorded as the 1-RM. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Participants were asked to lie on a padded platform while a mechanical arm passed over their body. Appendicular lean mass was calculated from the regional lean mass measurements of the arms and legs using DXA. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Participants were asked to lie on a padded platform while a mechanical arm passed over their body. Appendicular lean mass was calculated from the regional lean mass measurements of the arms and legs using DXA. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Participants were asked to lie on a padded platform while a mechanical arm passed over their body. Appendicular lean mass was calculated from the regional lean mass measurements of the arms and legs using DXA. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Participants were asked to lie on a padded platform while a mechanical arm passed over their body. Total lean mass was measured using DXA. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Participants were asked to lie on a padded platform while a mechanical arm passed over their body. Total lean mass was measured using DXA. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Participants were asked to lie on a padded platform while a mechanical arm passed over their body. Total lean mass was measured using DXA. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Participants were assessed for balance, time for chair rise and gait speed. These are the three components of SPPB. Each component was scored from 0 to 4. The total SPPB score was calculated by taking sum of scores of all 3 components, which ranged from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). Higher scores indicated better performance. Scores 10 to 12 indicated 'fit/normal' and scores <=7 indicated frail participant. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Participants were assessed for balance, time for chair rise and gait speed. These are the three components of SPPB. Each component was scored from 0 to 4. The total SPPB score was calculated by taking sum of scores of all 3 components, which ranged from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). Higher scores indicated better performance. Scores 10 to 12 indicated 'fit/normal' and scores <=7 indicated frail participant. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Participants were assessed for balance, time for chair rise and gait speed. These are the three components of SPPB. Each component was scored from 0 to 4. The total SPPB score was calculated by taking sum of scores of all 3 components, which ranged from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). Higher scores indicated better performance. Scores 10 to 12 indicated 'fit/normal' and scores <=7 indicated frail participant. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

'Time for chair rise' is one of the 3 components of SPPB, which was assessed by repeated chair stand test and calculated as time for five successful chair stands measured in seconds. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

'Time for chair rise' is one of the 3 components of SPPB, which was assessed by repeated chair stand test and calculated as time for five successful chair stands measured in seconds. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

'Time for chair rise' is one of the 3 components of SPPB, which was assessed by repeated chair stand test and calculated as time for five successful chair stands measured in seconds. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

''Time for fastest walk for 4 meter' was assessed by SPPB using 4 meter gait speed test. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

'Time for fastest walk for 4 meter' was assessed by SPPB using 4 meter gait speed test. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

'Time for fastest walk for 4 meter' was assessed by SPPB using 4 meter gait speed test. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

The endurance shuttle walk test is a CWR test requiring the participant to walk around a flat 10 meter track at a constant individualized pace. The test was externally paced, set to elicit a maximal exercise response (pace was based on a fixed percentage of prior incremental shuttle walk test performance, which determined a participant's peak exercise capacity). CWR duration is the time in seconds required by a participant to cover a flat 10 meter track during this test. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

An incremental shuttle walk test is an externally paced maximal exercise test which determined a participant's peak exercise capacity. The maximum duration of the test is 20 minutes. Peak performance was measured in meters, which was defined as the maximum distance covered by a participant until the participant can no longer continue walking during this test. Baseline was defined as the highest non-missing pre-dose assessment from Day -9 and Day 1. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

The CAT is a short and simple participant-completed questionnaire which was developed for use in routine clinical practice to measure the health status of participants with COPD. The CAT is an 8-item questionnaire suitable for completion by all participants diagnosed with COPD. Participants rated their experience on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment). A total CAT score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the eight items with a scoring range of 0-40. Higher scores indicated more severe disease impact. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

The CAT is a short and simple participant-completed questionnaire which was developed for use in routine clinical practice to measure the health status of participants with COPD. The CAT is an 8-item questionnaire suitable for completion by all participants diagnosed with COPD. Participants rated their experience on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment). A total CAT score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the eight items with a scoring range of 0-40. Higher scores indicated more severe disease impact. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

The daily PROactive instrument consisted of a PRO questionnaire and an activity monitor to measure participant experience of physical activity. It consisted of 9-item daily assessments covering 2 different domains (amount and difficulty). The 'amount' domain was covered by 2 questions combined with 2 activity monitor outputs. The 'difficulty' domain was covered by 5 questions. Individual domains were scored by simple adding items, gave raw score values 0 to 17 for 'amount' and 0 to 20 for 'difficulty'. The raw scores were then transformed to a 0 to 100 Rasch analysis based scale for each domain. Higher scores indicated worse experience with physical activity. Baseline was the average of the data collected from the 7-day period after dispensing of the device on Day -9. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented for averaged weekly difficulty score.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

The daily PROactive instrument consisted of a PRO questionnaire and an activity monitor to measure participant experience of physical activity. It consisted of 9-item daily assessments covering 2 different domains (amount and difficulty). The 'amount' domain was covered by 2 questions combined with 2 activity monitor outputs. The 'difficulty' domain was covered by 5 questions. Individual domains were scored by simple adding items, gave raw score values 0 to 17 for 'amount' and 0 to 20 for 'difficulty'. The raw scores were then transformed to a 0 to 100 Rasch analysis based scale for each domain. Higher scores indicated worse experience with physical activity. Baseline was the average of the data collected from the 7-day period after dispensing of the device on Day -9. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented for averaged weekly difficulty score.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

The daily PROactive instrument consisted of a PRO questionnaire and an activity monitor to measure participant experience of physical activity. It consisted of 9-item daily assessments covering 2 different domains (amount and difficulty). The 'amount' domain was covered by 2 questions combined with 2 activity monitor outputs. The 'difficulty' domain was covered by 5 questions. Individual domains were scored by simple adding items, gave raw score values 0 to 17 for 'amount' and 0 to 20 for 'difficulty'. The raw scores were then transformed to a 0 to 100 Rasch analysis based scale for each domain. Higher scores indicated worse experience with physical activity. Baseline was the average of the data collected from the 7-day period after dispensing of the device on Day -9. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented for averaged weekly amount score.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

The daily PROactive instrument consisted of a PRO questionnaire and an activity monitor to measure participant experience of physical activity. It consisted of 9-item daily assessments covering 2 different domains (amount and difficulty). The 'amount' domain was covered by 2 questions combined with 2 activity monitor outputs. The 'difficulty' domain was covered by 5 questions. Individual domains were scored by simple adding items, gave raw score values 0 to 17 for 'amount' and 0 to 20 for 'difficulty'. The raw scores were then transformed to a 0 to 100 Rasch analysis based scale for each domain. Higher scores indicated worse experience with physical activity. Baseline was the average of the data collected from the 7-day period after dispensing of the device on Day -9. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented for averaged weekly amount score.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

The daily PROactive instrument consisted of a PRO questionnaire and an activity monitor to measure participant experience of physical activity. It consisted of 9-item daily assessments covering 2 different domains(amount and difficulty). The'amount'domain was covered by 2 questions combined with 2 activity monitor outputs. The 'difficulty'domain was covered by 5 questions. Individual domains were scored by simple adding items, gave raw score values 0 to 17 for'amount'and 0 to 20 for'difficulty. The raw scores were then transformed to a 0 to 100 Rasch scale for each domain. The 'total score' was obtained by calculating the average between two domains. Total score has the range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicated worse experience with physical activity. Baseline was the average of the data collected from the 7-day period after dispensing of the device on Day -9. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

The daily PROactive instrument consisted of a PRO questionnaire and an activity monitor to measure participant experience of physical activity. It consisted of 9-item daily assessments covering 2 different domains(amount and difficulty). The'amount'domain was covered by 2 questions combined with 2 activity monitor outputs. The 'difficulty'domain was covered by 5 questions. Individual domains were scored by simple adding items, gave raw score values 0 to 17 for'amount'and 0 to 20 for'difficulty. The raw scores were then transformed to a 0 to 100 Rasch scale for each domain. The 'total score' was obtained by calculating the average between two domains. Total score has the range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicated worse experience with physical activity. Baseline was the average of the data collected from the 7-day period after dispensing of the device on Day -9. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Adjusted means and SE are presented.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

Steps per day was assessed using an accelerometer, a clinically validated physical activity monitor which was used to measure the levels of physical activity. Participants wore an accelerometer for 7 days during individual timepoint. Values at Baseline, Day 56 and Day 90 were the average values collected from an accelerometer for 7 days after the Day -9, Day 56 and Day 90. Baseline was the average of the data collected from the 7-day period after dispensing of the device on Day -9. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Vector magnitude unit per wear time was assessed using an accelerometer, a clinically validated physical activity monitor which was used to measure the levels of physical activity. Participants wore an accelerometer for 7 days during individual timepoint. Values at Baseline, Day 56 and Day 90 were the average values collected from accelerometer for 7 days after the Day -9, Day 56 and Day 90. Data from an accelerator was uploaded to a central site. Baseline was the average of the data collected from the 7-day period after dispensing of the device on Day -9. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Participant-reported response to treatment was assessed using the PGIC measure, a single item completed by participant to assess the participant's impression of change in their disease severity since the beginning of the study. Responses to the PGIC question were on a 7 point Likert scale: Much Better, Better, Slightly Better, No Change, Slightly Worse, Worse, and Much Worse. Number of participants with PGIC score is presented by treatment group, visit and by 7 response categories.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

PGRS is a single global question and was asked to participants to rate their COPD severity on a four point scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe). Number of participants with PGRS score ranging from mild to very severe are presented over time.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

SGRQ-c is the COPD specific version of SGRQ. It consisted of 40 items in total, corresponding to 3 individual domains (components): symptoms, activity and impact, with different components carrying a different weighting. Component scores were calculated by summing the weights from all positive items in that component, dividing by the sum of maximum possible weights for all items in that component, and multiplying this number by 100. Total score was calculated by summing the weight to all the positive responses in each component. Total score has the range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicated more severe disease impact. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

SGRQ-c is the COPD specific version of SGRQ. It consisted of 40 items in total, corresponding to 3 individual domains (components): symptoms, activity and impact, with different components carrying a different weighting. Component scores were calculated by summing the weights from all positive items in that component, dividing by the sum of maximum possible weights for all items in that component, and multiplying this number by 100. Symptoms component consisted of questions 1 to 7 in Part 1. Symptoms score has the range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicated more severe disease impact. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

SGRQ-c is the COPD specific version of SGRQ. It consisted of 40 items in total, corresponding to 3 individual domains (components): symptoms, activity and impact, with different components carrying a different weighting. Component scores were calculated by summing the weights from all positive items in that component, dividing by the sum of maximum possible weights for all items in that component, and multiplying this number by 100. Activity component consisted of questions 9 and 12 in Part 2 of the questionnaire. Activity score has the range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicated more severe disease impact. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

SGRQ-c is the COPD specific version of SGRQ. It consisted of 40 items in total, corresponding to 3 individual domains (components): symptoms, activity and impact, with different components carrying a different weighting. Component scores were calculated by summing the weights from all positive items in that component, dividing by the sum of maximum possible weights for all items in that component, and multiplying this number by 100. Impact component consisted of questions 8, 10, 11, 13, 14 in Part 2 of the questionnaire. Impact score has the range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicated more severe disease impact. Day 1 (Pre-dose) was considered as a Baseline. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. FEV1 measurements were collected using a spirometer. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

A bung size-specific to the participant was placed in the nostril deemed to be most patent by the investigator. The participant was asked to make a maximum voluntary sniff effort via a peak flow meter and the greatest effort from 10 repeat measurements were recorded. SnIP was measured in centimeter of water (cm H2O). Baseline was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Analysis Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles).

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. Pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters of GSK2881078 were calculated using non-compartmental methods.

Pharmacokinetic Population comprised of participants in the 'All Participants (all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication)'' Population for whom a PK sample was obtained and analyzed for GSK2881078.

Blood samples were collected at designated timepoints. PK parameters of GSK2881078 were calculated using non-compartmental methods.

Pharmacokinetic Population