Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In 2016, the Third International Consensus proposed a new strategy to screen aggravating risk in patients with septic shock. This strategy is based on quick-SOFA and the SOFA score. The main objective is to compare the prognostic performance of SEPSIS 3 against the previous strategy SEPSIS 2 to predict the admission in intensive care unit or the intra-hospital death.
This study compare the prognostic performance of two strategies. It's a monocentric, retrospective study in patients admitted to the emergency department.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intrinsic and Extrinsic properties of SEPSIS 3 strategy | The percentage of patients with high qSOFA score (2 or more) who were admitted in intensive care unit or who have died during their stay in hospital and rather the percentage of patients with a small qSOFA score who survived without passing through intensive care unit | Day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation between lactate levels and mortality | lactate levels at their admission | Day 1 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Retrospective study in patients admitted to the emergency department in the CHR Metz-Thionville
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018805 | Sepsis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
| D018746 | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |