Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-invasive reduction of subcutaneous fat along the jawline with Cryolipolysis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fat Reduction | Experimental | The treatments are designed to see if the fat can be reduced along the jawline with Cryolipolysis. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The ZELTIQ System | Device | The CoolSculpting machine will be used to perform the treatments. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADE) | This outcome measurement considered all unanticipated device- or procedure-related adverse effects. | Enrollment through study completion, an average of 6 months. |
| Number of Before and After Side-by-side Photograph Pairs Correctly Identified by At Least 2 of 3 Blinded, Independent Reviewers | Change in the treated vs. untreated areas will be assessed by observation of changes in surface contour and/or fat volume by an independent photo review of pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment images of the treated areas. Reviewers will be practicing dermatologists or plastic surgeons. All reviewers will be blinded to post-treatment vs. baseline untreated area. The order in which photographs will be presented will be randomized; for each subject placement of the baseline and pre-treatment image will be randomized for each pair of subject images. Reviewers will be asked to select the baseline photos for each subject photo series and record selections on a data collection form. Success is defined as 75% correct identification of pre-treatment photos by 2 out of 3 reviewers. | Baseline through 12 weeks post second treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Fat Layer in the Treated Jawline Area | When compared to baseline ultrasound imaging, the change in fat layer thickness at the final post-treatment visit will be measured. Ultrasound measurements were obtained in 5 areas intended for treatment at the baseline visit. A template was created for identification of the locations for subsequent measurements using external landmarks (e.g. skin imperfections) as reference points. The Treatment Effect = Follow-Up Average Thickness - Baseline Average Thickness. A negative change reflects a decrease in the average thickness from the baseline visit to the follow-up visit, and a positive result reflects an increase. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lori Brandt, BSN | Zeltiq Aesthetics | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacific Derm | Vancouver | British Columbia | V6H 4E1 | Canada |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | CoolSculpting for Jawline Contouring | All enrolled participants will be treated with the Zeltiq CoolSculpting System in the jawline area. Each participant will have up to 2 treatments, treatments 6 weeks apart. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | CoolSculpting for Jawline Contouring | All enrolled participants will be treated with the Zeltiq CoolSculpting System in the jawline area. Each participant will have up to 2 treatments, treatments 6 weeks apart. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADE) | This outcome measurement considered all unanticipated device- or procedure-related adverse effects. | All 15 enrolled subjects were evaluated by the study investigator for unanticipated adverse device effects throughout the duration of the study. | Posted | Number | Participants with UADE reported | Enrollment through study completion, an average of 6 months. |
|
Adverse event data were collected from the time of enrollment through the final 12-week post-final treatment follow-up visit, an average of 6 months.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | CoolSculpting for Jawline Contouring | All enrolled participants will be treated with the Zeltiq CoolSculpting System in the jawline area. Each participant will have up to 2 treatments, treatments 6 weeks apart. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prolonged bruising | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Brandt, Director Cinical Trial Management | Zeltiq Aesthetics | (925) 621-7460 | lori.brandt@abbvie.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 31, 2018 | Jun 5, 2025 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline and 12 weeks post-final treatment. |
| Overall Satisfaction With the Treatment | Subject satisfaction with the CoolSculpting procedure will be assessed by a questionnaire administered at the 12-week post-final treatment follow-up visit. The questionnaire will consist of 5-point Likert questions with 1 = very dissatisfied; 2 = dissatisfied; 3 = not sure; 4 = satisfied and 5 = very satisfied. Positive responses (very satisfied and satisfied) will be reported. | 12-week post-final treatment follow-up visit |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Number of Before and After Side-by-side Photograph Pairs Correctly Identified by At Least 2 of 3 Blinded, Independent Reviewers | Change in the treated vs. untreated areas will be assessed by observation of changes in surface contour and/or fat volume by an independent photo review of pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment images of the treated areas. Reviewers will be practicing dermatologists or plastic surgeons. All reviewers will be blinded to post-treatment vs. baseline untreated area. The order in which photographs will be presented will be randomized; for each subject placement of the baseline and pre-treatment image will be randomized for each pair of subject images. Reviewers will be asked to select the baseline photos for each subject photo series and record selections on a data collection form. Success is defined as 75% correct identification of pre-treatment photos by 2 out of 3 reviewers. | Fourteen (14) of the enrolled subjects were included in the analysis of efficacy. One (1) subject was excluded due to body weight outside the requirements of the protocol. | Posted | Number | Number Photo Pairs Correctly Identified | Baseline through 12 weeks post second treatment. | Photograph Pairs | Photograph Pairs |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Fat Layer in the Treated Jawline Area | When compared to baseline ultrasound imaging, the change in fat layer thickness at the final post-treatment visit will be measured. Ultrasound measurements were obtained in 5 areas intended for treatment at the baseline visit. A template was created for identification of the locations for subsequent measurements using external landmarks (e.g. skin imperfections) as reference points. The Treatment Effect = Follow-Up Average Thickness - Baseline Average Thickness. A negative change reflects a decrease in the average thickness from the baseline visit to the follow-up visit, and a positive result reflects an increase. | Fourteen (14) subjects were included in the efficacy analysis; one (1) subject was excluded due to weight change outside of the requirements of the protocol. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm | Baseline and 12 weeks post-final treatment. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Satisfaction With the Treatment | Subject satisfaction with the CoolSculpting procedure will be assessed by a questionnaire administered at the 12-week post-final treatment follow-up visit. The questionnaire will consist of 5-point Likert questions with 1 = very dissatisfied; 2 = dissatisfied; 3 = not sure; 4 = satisfied and 5 = very satisfied. Positive responses (very satisfied and satisfied) will be reported. | Fourteen subjects were included in the efficacy analysis. One subject was excluded due to weight change outside the requirements of the protocol. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12-week post-final treatment follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 15 |
| 0 |
| 15 |
| 2 |
| 15 |
| Prolonged edema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided