Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This was a study estimating the clinical difference between 300 mg and 150 mg of secukinumab following dose escalation to 300 mg in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
The study used a multicenter design which included an initial 16 week open-label period (Treatment Period 1) followed by a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group period (Treatment Period 2),
At Week 16, patients were placed into 1 of the following groups:
Note: To minimize patient burden, at the Week 16 Visit, the hs-CRP measurement that is part of the ASDAS calculation was imputed from the Week 12 hs-CRP results to allow for assignment into the groups above. Historically, hs-CRP levels have varied little between Week 12 and Week 16 or in previous studies of secukinumab in active AS.
1. Treatment Period 2: Upon completion of the Week 16 visit,
Patients could discontinue the study at any time. If rescue treatment with prohibited medications (as described in Section 9.4.7) occurred, patients were discontinued from the study and were to return for an End of Study Visit. The End of Study Visit was scheduled approximately 4 weeks after the last study treatment and was performed before any new treatment was initiated. After the End of Study Visit, any serious adverse events (SAEs) that occurred in the following 30 days were required to be reported.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Responders | Active Comparator | Patients who achieved an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease (total score <1.3) at both Week 12 and Week 16. |
|
| Inadequate responders | Active Comparator | Patients who have active disease, defined as an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) total score of >1.3 at both Week 12 and Week 16, and who achieved a decrease (improvement) from baseline in total ASDAS score at both Week 12 and Week 16. |
|
| Non-responders | Active Comparator | Patients who exhibit no change or an increase (worsening) from baseline in total Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) score at either Week 12 or Week 16. Non-responders were not entered Treatment Period 2. Non-responders were discontinued from the study at Week 16. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150 mg open-label secukinumab | Drug | All patients in Treatment Period 1 received 150 mg s.c. injection open-label secukinumab. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Proportion of Participants Who Achieved Inactive Disease Based on the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Measure | Proportion of participants with inadequate response at week 16 who achieved inactive disease at Week 52 The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The ASDAS-CRP (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) were utilized to assess the disease activity status.
| Week 52 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Important Improvement on the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Scale | A reduction from baseline in ASDAS score of ≥1.1 was considered a clinically important improvement in disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. In this study, ASDAS is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The ASDAS-CRP (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) wias utilized to assess the disease activity status.
|
Not provided
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Jonesboro | Arkansas | 72401 | United States | ||
| Novartis Investigative Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39133200 | Derived | Deodhar A, Kivitz AJ, Magrey M, Walsh JA, Mease PJ, Greenwald M, Kianifard F, Elam C, Bommidi GM, Winseck A, Gensler LS. A secukinumab dose-escalation study in patients with ankylosing spondylitis not achieving inactive disease after 16 weeks of treatment. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Apr 1;64(4):1864-1872. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae432. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on novctrd.com | View source |
Not provided
Novartis is committed to sharing access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies with qualified external researchers. Requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to protect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Of 435 patients screened in the study, 322 (74.0%) completed the Screening phase.
322 participants were enrolled at 65 sites in the United States
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Period 1: Secukinumab 150 mg | Participants received Secukinumab 150 mg in Period 1 |
| FG001 | Period 2: Secukinumab 300 mg (Period 1 Inadequate Responders) | Participants received Secukinumab 150 mg in Period 1 were assessed as inadequate responders and randomized to receive Secukinumab 300 mg in Period 2 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 20, 2020 | Jan 7, 2022 |
Not provided
Not provided
This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter design which included an initial 16 week open-label period (Treatment Period 1) followed by a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group period (Treatment Period 2),
Not provided
Not provided
Patients and Investigators will be blinded to the secukinumab dose during Treatment Period 2.
|
| 150 mg double-blinded secukinumab | Drug | Treatment Period 2 Patients who achieved responder status entered Treatment Period 2 and continued to receive 150 mg s.c. (1 s.c. injection of secukinumab 150 mg) |
|
|
| 300 mg double-blinded secukinumab | Drug | Treatment Period 2 300 mg (2 s.c. injections of the 150 mg dose) |
|
|
| Baseline, Week 52 |
| Change in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | BASDAI is a validated assessment tool using 0 through 10 scales (0 indicating "no problem" and 10 indicating "worst problem"), to characterize six clinical domains pertaining to five major symptoms of AS perceived by the patients. Computed composite scores of 4 or greater indicate suboptimal disease control. In this study, BASDAI is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Proportion of Patients Who Achieved Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI-50) | BASDAI-50 represents a change from baseline (improvement) of at least 50% in BASDAI score. In this study, BASDAI is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. | Baseline, Week 52 |
| The Proportion of Participants Who Achieved an ASAS 20 Response (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Criteria) | ASAS 20 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined time frame at least 20% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevant to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain. In this study, ASAS20 is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. An ASAS20 response is defined as an improvement of ≥20% from baseline and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 1 on a 0-to-10 scale in at least 3 of the following 4 domains: patient global, total back pain, function (BASFI), and inflammation (average of the last 2 questions of the BASDAI concerning morning stiffness). An absence of deterioration from baseline (deterioration defines as ≥20% worsening and absolute worsening of at last 1 on a 0-to-10 scale) in the potential remaining domain. | Week 52 |
| The Proportion of Participants Who Achieved an ASAS 40 Response | ASAS 40 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined time frame at least 40% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevant to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain. In this study, ASAS40 is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. An ASAS40 response is defined as a ≥40% improvement in 3 of the 4 domains with an absolute improvement of at least 2 on a 0-to-10 scale, and no worsening in the remaining domain. | Week 52 |
| The Proportion of Patients Who Achieved an ASAS Partial Remission | The ASAS partial remission criteria are defined as a value not above 2 units in each of the four main domains on a scale of 0-10. In this study, ASAS partial remission is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. | Week 52 |
| Change in ASAS - Health Index Over Time | The ASAS-HI is a self-administered questionnaire and measures functioning and health over 17 aspects of health and 9 environmental factors in patients with spondyloarthritis. Patients score each item as "I agree" and "I do not agree". In this study, ASAS-HI is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. Lower score indicating a better health status | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Over Time | Fatigue was assessed using the 13-item FACIT-fatigue scale for the assessment of fatigue in cancer patients.24 The FACIT-Fatigue is a validated questionnaire that was originally developed for the precise evaluation of fatigue levels in cancer patients with anemia. It consists of 13 questions using a 5 point scale (0=not at all; 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much). Responses to each question were added with equal weight to obtain a total score. The range of possible scores is 0-52, with 0 corresponding to the highest level of fatigue and 52 corresponding to the lowest level of fatigue. | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Fullerton |
| California |
| 92835 |
| United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Loma Linda | California | 92354 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Palm Desert | California | 92260 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Tustin | California | 92780 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Upland | California | 91786 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Aventura | Florida | 33180 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Boca Raton | Florida | 33486 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Brandon | Florida | 33511 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | DeLand | Florida | 32720 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Gainesville | Florida | 32608 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Orlando | Florida | 32810 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Plantation | Florida | 33324 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | St. Petersburg | Florida | 33705 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Tamarac | Florida | 33321 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Tampa | Florida | 33609 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Zephyrhills | Florida | 33542 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Duluth | Georgia | 30096 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Springfield | Illinois | 62703 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Vernon Hills | Illinois | 60061 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Evansville | Indiana | 47715 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Monroe | Louisiana | 71203 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Cumberland | Maryland | 21740 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Hagerstown | Maryland | 21740 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Wheaton | Maryland | 20902 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Boston | Massachusetts | 02111 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 5271 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Saint Clair Shores | Michigan | 48081 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Edina | Minnesota | 55435 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Springfield | Missouri | 65810 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Midland Park | New Jersey | 07432 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Voorhees Township | New Jersey | 08043 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87102 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Santa Fe | New Mexico | 87505 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Brooklyn | New York | 11201 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Orchard Park | New York | 14127 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Potsdam | New York | 13676 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Minot | North Dakota | 58701 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Dayton | Ohio | 45402 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Middleburg Heights | Ohio | 44130 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73103 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Corvallis | Oregon | 97330 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | 16635 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Wexford | Pennsylvania | 15090 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Charleston | South Carolina | 29460 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Columbia | South Carolina | 29204 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Jackson | Tennessee | 38305 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Memphis | Tennessee | 38119 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Beaumont | Texas | 77701 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Colleyville | Texas | 76034 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Houston | Texas | 77025 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Houston | Texas | 77089 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Mesquite | Texas | 75150 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84132 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Seattle | Washington | 98104 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Seattle | Washington | 98195 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Spokane | Washington | 99204 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Charleston | West Virginia | 25304 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Manitowoc | Wisconsin | 54220 | United States |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Onalaska | Wisconsin | 54650 | United States |
| FG002 | Secukinumab 150 mg (Period 1 Inadequate Responders) | Participants received Secukinumab 150 mg in Period 1 were assessed as inadequate responders and continued with Secukinumab 150 mg in Period 2 |
| FG003 | Secukinumab 150 mg (Period 1 Responders) | Participants received Secukinumab 150 mg in Period 1 were assessed as responders and continued with Secukinumab 150 mg in Period 2 |
| Non-responders | One patient completed Treatment Period 1 and was randomized (secukinumab 150 mg - 300 mg [IR]); however, the patient did not receive any treatment in Treatment Period 2 due to "Technical problems." |
|
| Inadequate Responders |
|
| Responders |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Period 2 |
|
|
This is for participants in period 1. 300 mg Arm was not part of Enrollment Set.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Secukinumab 150 mg - 150 mg | AIN457 150 mg - 150 mg |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Enrolled Set | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Enrolled Set | Mean | Standard Deviation | Mean |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Enrolled Set | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The Proportion of Participants Who Achieved Inactive Disease Based on the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Measure | Proportion of participants with inadequate response at week 16 who achieved inactive disease at Week 52 The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The ASDAS-CRP (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) were utilized to assess the disease activity status.
| The Full Analysis Set (FAS) comprised all patients to whom study treatment had been assigned by randomization. According to intent-to-treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to during the randomization procedure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 52 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Important Improvement on the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) Scale | A reduction from baseline in ASDAS score of ≥1.1 was considered a clinically important improvement in disease activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis. In this study, ASDAS is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The ASDAS-CRP (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) wias utilized to assess the disease activity status.
| FAS (defined as a patient with inadequte respinse at week 16) for patients with valid assessment for this endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, Week 52 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) | BASDAI is a validated assessment tool using 0 through 10 scales (0 indicating "no problem" and 10 indicating "worst problem"), to characterize six clinical domains pertaining to five major symptoms of AS perceived by the patients. Computed composite scores of 4 or greater indicate suboptimal disease control. In this study, BASDAI is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. | FAS for patients with valid assessment for this endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a scale | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Who Achieved Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI-50) | BASDAI-50 represents a change from baseline (improvement) of at least 50% in BASDAI score. In this study, BASDAI is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. | FAS for patients with valid assessment for this endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Proportion of Participants Who Achieved an ASAS 20 Response (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Criteria) | ASAS 20 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined time frame at least 20% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevant to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain. In this study, ASAS20 is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. An ASAS20 response is defined as an improvement of ≥20% from baseline and absolute improvement from baseline of at least 1 on a 0-to-10 scale in at least 3 of the following 4 domains: patient global, total back pain, function (BASFI), and inflammation (average of the last 2 questions of the BASDAI concerning morning stiffness). An absence of deterioration from baseline (deterioration defines as ≥20% worsening and absolute worsening of at last 1 on a 0-to-10 scale) in the potential remaining domain. | FAS for patients with valid assessment for this endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 52 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Proportion of Participants Who Achieved an ASAS 40 Response | ASAS 40 response is a validated composite assessment, reflecting the proportion of treated patients who achieve within a defined time frame at least 40% improvement in score in at least 3 of a conventional set of 4 clinical domains relevant to AS and no worsening in the fourth domain. In this study, ASAS40 is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. An ASAS40 response is defined as a ≥40% improvement in 3 of the 4 domains with an absolute improvement of at least 2 on a 0-to-10 scale, and no worsening in the remaining domain. | FAS for patients with valid assessment for this endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 52 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Proportion of Patients Who Achieved an ASAS Partial Remission | The ASAS partial remission criteria are defined as a value not above 2 units in each of the four main domains on a scale of 0-10. In this study, ASAS partial remission is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. | FAS for patients with valid assessment for this endpoint. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 52 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in ASAS - Health Index Over Time | The ASAS-HI is a self-administered questionnaire and measures functioning and health over 17 aspects of health and 9 environmental factors in patients with spondyloarthritis. Patients score each item as "I agree" and "I do not agree". In this study, ASAS-HI is used to estimate the difference in response between 150mg and 300mg of secukinumab. Lower score indicating a better health status | FAS for patients with valid assessment for this endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) - Fatigue Over Time | Fatigue was assessed using the 13-item FACIT-fatigue scale for the assessment of fatigue in cancer patients.24 The FACIT-Fatigue is a validated questionnaire that was originally developed for the precise evaluation of fatigue levels in cancer patients with anemia. It consists of 13 questions using a 5 point scale (0=not at all; 1 = a little bit, 2 = somewhat, 3 = quite a bit and 4 = very much). Responses to each question were added with equal weight to obtain a total score. The range of possible scores is 0-52, with 0 corresponding to the highest level of fatigue and 52 corresponding to the lowest level of fatigue. | FAS for patients with valid assessment for this endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
|
AEs were collected from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment at week 52
Adverse Events (AEs) are any untoward sign or symptom that occurs during the study treatment and up to 52 weeks
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treatment Period 2 Secukinumab 150 mg - 150 mg (R) | Treatment Period 2 Secukinumab 150 mg - 150 mg (R) | 0 | 22 | 0 | 22 | 7 | 22 |
| EG001 | Treatment Period 1 Secukinumab 150 mg | Treatment Period 1 Secukinumab 150 mg | 0 | 322 | 11 | 322 | 50 | 322 |
| EG002 | Treatment Period 2 Secukinumab 150 mg - 300 mg (IR) | Treatment Period 2 Secukinumab 150 mg - 300 mg (IR) | 0 | 101 | 7 | 101 | 30 | 101 |
| EG003 | Treatment Period 2 Secukinumab 150 mg - 150 mg (IR) | Treatment Period 2 Secukinumab 150 mg - 150 mg (IR) | 0 | 105 | 3 | 105 | 32 | 105 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis ulcerative | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acetabulum fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Compression fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lumbar vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rib fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Road traffic accident | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Traumatic haemothorax | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypercalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypocalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypomagnesaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Type 1 diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Systemic lupus erythematosus | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Basal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bladder cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Migraine | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| SARS-CoV-2 test negative | Investigations | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ankylosing spondylitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (ie, data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | +1 (862) 778-8300 | novartis.email@novartis.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 8, 2021 | Jan 7, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013167 | Spondylitis, Ankylosing |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000089183 | Axial Spondyloarthritis |
| D025242 | Spondylarthropathies |
| D025241 | Spondylarthritis |
| D013166 | Spondylitis |
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D000844 | Ankylosis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C555450 | secukinumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Technical problem |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Lack of Efficacy |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| New therapy for study indication |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native American |
|
| Pacific Islander |
|
| Other |
|
| Unknown |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|