Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Comparison between interlocking multi-twisted wires and Eight figure of sternum closure post open heart surgery in egptian patients
Comparison between interlocking multi-twisted wires and Eight figure of sternum closure post open heart surgery in egptian patients
Midline sternotomy, first described by Milton in 1887 [4,7,8] remains the most popular technique of cardiac exposure because of its quick and easy performance, excellent access to the heart and great vessels. Effective prevention methods for disruption and infection of median sternotomy continue to be debated. The most important factor in preventing PSWC is a stable sternal approximation, as bony union depends on adequate reduction and immobilization of the stern costal junctions. Strict adherence of preoperative aseptic technique is crucial. Careful attention to homeostasis and meticulous surgical technique remain the mainstays of prevention and must include precise sternal alignment and stable closure. While biomechanical studies appear to be valid, their general value is limited Different sternal closure techniques
6- Alternative techniques
Techniques utilizing lateral sternal support are first-line options in preventing SD and wound infections. The need to provide lateral reinforcement of the sternum has led to the development of several techniques, such as A-the use of lateral staples and lateral plates B-H-shaped titanium plates C- Reinforced sternal closure system D-thermo reactive clips E- Rigid plate fixation change
The purpose of this report was to analyze (I) the efficacy of most used ways in sternal closure in our center ( interlocking multi-twisted wires and Eight figure )for the prevention of Post sternal wound complication in adult egyptian patients and find the way more efficient in sternal closure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| group A | Interlocking multi-twisted wires techniqe in sternal closure |
| |
| group B | Eight Figure techniqe in sternal closure |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interlocking multi-twisted wires in sternal closure | Procedure | One of many ways in cloure of sternal give more stabilization. At least 6 wires have to be passed. The wirs should run around the sternum in the intercostals spaces except in the manubrium where it has to be passed through the bone . Adjacent wires on the surgeon's side are wrapped around each other. The wires on the surgeon's side are then pulled towards the assistant so that the sternum is re-approximated. Alternatively the surgeon can also pull the wires at the assistant's side towards himself or herself approximating the sternum. Adjacent wires on the assistant's side are then wrapped around each other. The wrapped wires on both sides are then wrapped around each other The wrapped wires are then twisted around with a twister, closing the sternum tightly and the ends of the are burried |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Healing of the sternum | Duration of complete healing of the sternum :By
| 60 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| rate of wound infection | way less liable to infect wound either skin infection or wound dehiscence | 30 days |
| mobilization | Early mobilization after surgery till returning to normal movement including freely arm movement |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Adult patient above 16 years undergoing open heart surgery with sternotomy
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assiut University | Recruiting | Asyut | 71621 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16935107 | Result | Karra R, McDermott L, Connelly S, Smith P, Sexton DJ, Kaye KS. Risk factors for 1-year mortality after postoperative mediastinitis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Sep;132(3):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.04.037. | |
| 15296898 | Result | Song DH, Lohman RF, Renucci JD, Jeevanandam V, Raman J. Primary sternal plating in high-risk patients prevents mediastinitis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Aug;26(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.04.038. |
Not provided
Not provided
Information collected by this study may contribute to decrease postoperative complication as sternal dehescince , improve local wound complication & decrease cost by decrease hospital stay & need for antibiotics needed for wound infection and rewiring. On the other hand patients will benefit from the clinical and radiological follow up postoperatively. There are no known risks associated with participation in this study. Patients' treatment and follow up will not be altered by any means.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Eight Figure techniqe in sternal closure | Procedure | The figure-eight closure is described as faster, simpler, and more reliable than its trans-sternal counterpart; with only oblique forces sutures are less likely to loosen or fracture the sternum. The advantage of figure-eight closure is that it allows oblique and horizontal angle of shearing forces instead of direct perpendicular forces. Thus these wires are less likely to loosen or fracture |
|
| 45 days |
| Time of procedure | time taken by each way in sternal closure | 45 days |
| 14666006 | Result | Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Vida V, Casarotto D, Gerosa G. Double crisscross sternal wiring and chest wound infections: a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Nov;126(5):1352-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00945-0. |
| 14726062 | Result | Losanoff JE, Collier AD, Wagner-Mann CC, Richman BW, Huff H, Hsieh Fh, Diaz-Arias A, Jones JW. Biomechanical comparison of median sternotomy closures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jan;77(1):203-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01468-1. |
| 10757149 | Result | Robicsek F, Fokin A, Cook J, Bhatia D. Sternal instability after midline sternotomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Feb;48(1):1-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9945. |
| 17884847 | Result | Schimmer C, Sommer SP, Bensch M, Leyh R. Primary treatment of deep sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: a survey of German heart surgery centers. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007 Dec;6(6):708-11. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2007.164004. Epub 2007 Sep 20. |
| 11306315 | Result | Noyez L, van Druten JA, Mulder J, Schroen AM, Skotnicki SH, Brouwer RM. Sternal wound complications after primary isolated myocardial revascularization: the importance of the post-operative variables. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Apr;19(4):471-6. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00610-8. |
| Result | [11] Prakash.P.Punjabi Essentials_of_Operative cardiac surgery page 62 chest closure |