Is Ablation of All Inducible Atrial Tachycardias an Appropriate Endpoint During Redo Procedures After Initial Persistent AF Ablation? A Multi-center, Randomised, Single-blind Study
Is Ablation of All Inducible Atrial Tachycardias an Appropriate Endpoint During Redo Procedures After Initial Persistent AF Ablation? A Multi-center, Randomised, Single-blind Study
In the treatment of symptomatic drug resistant persistent atrial fibrillation (Ps AF), catheter ablation has a class IIA indication. During the follow-up, a significant amount of patients (~50%) will experience atrial tachycardias (AT) recurrence. The endpoint of AT ablation during the second procedure has not been validated. At present, several strategies are considered as good clinical practice.
Main objective: To evaluate if ablation of all inducible AT post AF ablation (ATPAFA) offers as substantial benefit in comparison with ablation of the clinical ATPAF only during a redo procedure post initial persistent AF ablation.
Secondary objectives:
To evaluate the prognosis of non-inducibility during a redo procedure for ATPAFA
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: