Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Floralis | INDUSTRY |
| eBikeLabs | UNKNOWN |
| Rocheplane Medical Center | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this pilot study is to encourage oncology patients to continue effort retraining after their release from rehabilitation and recuperative care facilities with physical activity sessions and therapeutic education using an intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS)
The benefit of physical activity in oncology is now clearly established. Physical activity has its place at all stages of the fight against cancer in primary, secondary and tertiary prevention.
Rehabilitation and recuperative care facilities may be a first step for patients with significant deconditioning, but long-term benefits are essential.
Nevertheless, the post rehabilitation and recuperative care facilities transition period is for these patients a temporary period during which they may loose part of the benefit of effort retraining and physical reconditioning.
The investigators believe that it is necessary to go beyond the "physiological" efficiency to identify and overcome the patient's stereotypes regarding physical activity, to customize and adapt the programs to each patient, and to bring quickly the notion of pleasure and success in the practice of physical activity. Electrically assisted bicycles can reach most of these goals provided that they are adapted.
The objective of this project is to set up and evaluate, thanks to a monocentric pilot study, a process of continuation of exercise retraining through physical activity and therapeutic education sessions for the promotion of physical activity, focusing on the use of electrically assisted bicycles, in continuation of an exercise retraining in rehabilitation and recuperative care facilities.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions | Experimental | Intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions with an instructor, twice a week for 6 weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions | Other | Oncology patients will participate in intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions twice a week for 6 weeks after their release from a rehabilitation and recuperative care facility |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of patients reaching the goal of 150 min equivalent of moderate physical activity per week (600 MET-min/week) | Evaluated with the IPAQ questionnaire short version (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) | 4 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quantitative analysis of kinetic physical activity evolution | Longitudinal continue quantitative data from IPAQ score | Enrollment and then once a month from Month 2 to Month 4, the last week of the month, velis sessions and effort retraining excluded |
| Evaluate the VELIS sessions feasibility n°1 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jean-Luc Bosson, MD | Laboratoire TIMC - Themas | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocheplane Medical Center | Saint-Martin-d'Hères | Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 38400 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24599577 | Background | Phillips SM, Alfano CM, Perna FM, Glasgow RE. Accelerating translation of physical activity and cancer survivorship research into practice: recommendations for a more integrated and collaborative approach. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May;23(5):687-99. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1355. Epub 2014 Mar 5. | |
| 17671237 | Background |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| 3rd report INCA february 2017 | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Number of cancelled sessions |
| 4 Months |
| Evaluate the VELIS sessions feasibility n°2 | Number of incomplete sessions | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the VELIS sessions feasibility n°3 | Collection of the failure reasons by the instructor | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°1 | Progression of the patients physical activity (clinical exam weight) | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°2 | Progression of the patients physical activity (heart rate) | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°3 | Progression of the patients physical activity (analysis of physio-cardiological criteria) | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°4 | Analysis of the progression during intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions with associated factors (initial gain in effort retraining) | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°5 | Analysis of the progression during intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions with associated factors (age) | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°6 | Analysis of the progression during intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions with associated factors (gender) | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°7 | Analysis of the progression during intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions with associated factors (pathologies) | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°8 | Constant-Load Exercise Test at 80% MAP (Maximum Aerobic Power) (endurance test on ergocycle) | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°9 | Constant-Load Exercise Test at 80% MAP (Maximum Aerobic Power) (evaluation with the quantitative Borg scale (from Pr Gunnar BORG) from 0 to 10 (the goal score is 4 to 5)). | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°10 | Constant-Load Exercise Test at 80% MAP (Maximum Aerobic Power) (heart rate) | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°11 | Constant-Load Exercise Test at 80% MAP (Maximum Aerobic Power) (visual analogical scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximal pain) for the lower limbs pain. Lower value is a better outcome) | 4 Months |
| Evaluate the impact on the physical capacities n°12 | Measurement of the muscular power using a handgrip (physiological parameter). Higher value is a better outcome. | 4 Months |
| Improve quality of life | Euroquol 5 dimensions scale (from 0 to 100 : higher value is a better outcome) | 4 Months |
| Improve fatigue n°1 | Analogic visual scale about fatigue once a month | 4 Months |
| Improve fatigue n°2 | Fatigue Piper score | 4 Months |
| Improve chronic pain | Analogic visual scale about pain once a month | 4 Months |
| Improve self-esteem | Evaluation with Rosenberg score | 4 Months |
| Improve patient satisfaction | Satisfaction survey and wish to do again intelligent electric bicycle (VELIS) sessions or to continue electric bicycle sessions | 4 Months |
| Remove stereotypes that can lead to inhibition in the physical activity practice | Evaluation of the psychological representation of physical activity using the Cancer Exercise Stereotypes Scale (CESS) questionnaire from the SENS (sport and social environment laboratory) team from Grenoble. The average value is calculated for each subscale. Adherence to positive stereotypes if value is below 4 for the following subscale :
| 4 Months |
| Evolution of uses and performances during bicycle sessions at the beginning and the end of the intervention n°1 | Analysis of the parameters profiles recorded by the VELIS : heart rate monitor | 6 weeks |
| Evolution of uses and performances during bicycle sessions at the beginning and the end of the intervention n°2 | Analysis of the parameters profiles recorded by the VELIS : speed | 6 weeks |
| Evolution of uses and performances during bicycle sessions at the beginning and the end of the intervention n°3 | Analysis of the parameters profiles recorded by the VELIS : electric power provided by the engine | 6 weeks |
| Evolution of uses and performances during bicycle sessions at the beginning and the end of the intervention n°4 | Analysis of the parameters profiles recorded by the VELIS : rate of pedaling for the reference itinerary | 6 weeks |
| Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, Macera CA, Heath GW, Thompson PD, Bauman A; American College of Sports Medicine; American Heart Association. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007 Aug 28;116(9):1081-93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185649. Epub 2007 Aug 1. |
| 17762378 | Background | Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1435-45. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616aa2. |
| 26914609 | Background | Mielgo-Ayuso J, Aparicio-Ugarriza R, Castillo A, Ruiz E, Avila JM, Aranceta-Batrina J, Gil A, Ortega RM, Serra-Majem L, Varela-Moreiras G, Gonzalez-Gross M. Physical Activity Patterns of the Spanish Population Are Mostly Determined by Sex and Age: Findings in the ANIBES Study. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0149969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149969. eCollection 2016. |
| 22182828 | Background | Pavey TG, Anokye N, Taylor AH, Trueman P, Moxham T, Fox KR, Hillsdon M, Green C, Campbell JL, Foster C, Mutrie N, Searle J, Taylor RS. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2011 Dec;15(44):i-xii, 1-254. doi: 10.3310/hta15440. |
| 22913003 | Background | Welker J, Cornuz J, Gojanovic B. [Electrically assisted bicycles: health enhancement or "green" gadget?]. Rev Med Suisse. 2012 Jul 25;8(349):1513-7. French. |
| 27299435 | Background | Peterman JE, Morris KL, Kram R, Byrnes WC. Pedelecs as a physically active transportation mode. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Aug;116(8):1565-73. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3408-9. Epub 2016 Jun 14. |
| 22005715 | Background | Gojanovic B, Welker J, Iglesias K, Daucourt C, Gremion G. Electric bicycles as a new active transportation modality to promote health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Nov;43(11):2204-10. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821cbdc8. |
| 19812505 | Background | Simons M, Van Es E, Hendriksen I. Electrically assisted cycling: a new mode for meeting physical activity guidelines? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Nov;41(11):2097-102. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a6aaa4. |
| 25174265 | Background | Falzon C, Sabiston C, Bergamaschi A, Corrion K, Chalabaev A, D'Arripe-Longueville F. Development and validation of the Cancer Exercise Stereotypes Scale. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2014;32(6):708-26. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2014.955237. |
| 9599351 | Background | Piper BF, Dibble SL, Dodd MJ, Weiss MC, Slaughter RE, Paul SM. The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 May;25(4):677-84. |
| Evaluation of the impact on health. Promotion of the electrical bike. Final report. 2006 | View source |
| Gretchen Reynolds. The Surprising Health Benefits of an Electric Bike JULY 6, 2016 6:00 AM July 6, 2016. | View source |