Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Clinical monitoring is the most common method of adjustment of the appropriate level of general anesthesia. However, the episodes of intraoperative awareness are still reported, suggesting that clinical observations may not be sufficient in some cases. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of clinical and instrumental neuromonitoring with auditory evoked potentials in intraoperative analysis of the proper level of general anesthesia.
The patients scheduled for elective surgery were included into the study, and randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the first group (TIVA group) underwent intravenous, in the second group (VA group) underwent volatile anesthesia. The adequacy of anesthesia was analyzed with standard clinical parameters. All the participants were instrumentally monitored with AAI index. After the anesthesia patients received a questionnaire with the questions regarding possible intraoperative awareness.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIVA group | Other | The participants scheduled for elective ENT procedures or for elective discectomy. The surgery was performed under totally intravenous anesthesia. During procedure, monitoring of the proper level of general anesthesia both clinical and instrumental was performed. |
|
| VA group | Other | The participants scheduled for elective ENT procedures or for elective discectomy. The surgery was performed under volatile anesthesia. During procedure, monitoring of the proper level of general anesthesia both clinical and instrumental was performed. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| monitoring of the proper level of general anesthesia | Other | The monitoring of the adequate level of general anesthesia was performed both clinically and instrumentally. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in AAI values in selected (16) time points. | T1: after premedication, just before the onset of anesthesia; T2: 30 seconds after intravenous administration of propofol; T3: just before the endotracheal intubation; T4: 60 seconds after the endotracheal intubation; T5: 5 minutes after the endotracheal |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy | Warsaw | 04-141 | Poland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11718878 | Background | Saper CB, Chou TC, Scammell TE. The sleep switch: hypothalamic control of sleep and wakefulness. Trends Neurosci. 2001 Dec;24(12):726-31. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)02002-6. | |
| 12195434 | Background | Nelson LE, Guo TZ, Lu J, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M. The sedative component of anesthesia is mediated by GABA(A) receptors in an endogenous sleep pathway. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Oct;5(10):979-84. doi: 10.1038/nn913. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D026661 | Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011367 | Professional Staff Committees |
| D011785 | Quality Assurance, Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are assigned to intravenous or volatile anesthesia. In both groups both the clinical and instrumental monitoring of the proper level of anesthesia was analyzed.
Not provided
Not provided
During the anesthesia, in all the participants an AAI-A line ARX index was continuously monitored. The electrodes were placed after the induction of anesthesia.
Intraoperatively, both auditory evoked potentials with AAI index and electroencephalogram with burst suppression analysis was recorded. Recorded data were blinded for anesthesiologists, so were not used for analysis of level of anesthesia during surgery.
|
| 18383504 | Background | Lu J, Nelson LE, Franks N, Maze M, Chamberlin NL, Saper CB. Role of endogenous sleep-wake and analgesic systems in anesthesia. J Comp Neurol. 2008 Jun 1;508(4):648-62. doi: 10.1002/cne.21685. |
| 19151283 | Background | Ghoneim MM, Block RI, Haffarnan M, Mathews MJ. Awareness during anesthesia: risk factors, causes and sequelae: a review of reported cases in the literature. Anesth Analg. 2009 Feb;108(2):527-35. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318193c634. |
| 21181566 | Background | Wang DS, Orser BA. Inhibition of learning and memory by general anesthetics. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;58(2):167-77. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9428-8. Epub 2010 Dec 23. |
| 15333419 | Background | Sebel PS, Bowdle TA, Ghoneim MM, Rampil IJ, Padilla RE, Gan TJ, Domino KB. The incidence of awareness during anesthesia: a multicenter United States study. Anesth Analg. 2004 Sep;99(3):833-839. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000130261.90896.6C. |
| 11543846 | Background | Osterman JE, Hopper J, Heran WJ, Keane TM, van der Kolk BA. Awareness under anesthesia and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2001 Jul-Aug;23(4):198-204. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(01)00142-6. |