Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession
Comparison between two techniques for root coverage divided in two groups the first (test group) VISTA technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane and the second (control group)MCAF technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane for treating Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects.
Clinical Periodontal Records will be taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months respectively.
Visual analogue scale for pain during one week after operation. Patient satisfaction record using questionnaire after 6 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vista technique | Experimental | The vista technique with PRF membrane uses a Vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access in combination with Platelet rich fibrin membrane to treat gingival recession defects. |
|
| modified coronally advanced flap | Active Comparator | A modified coronally advanced flap utilising Platelet rich fibrin membrane to treat gingival recession defects. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VISTA Technique | Procedure | VISTA with PRF membrane includes Treatment of recession class I and II using autologous PRF membrane |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient satisfaction | Using a questionnaire which are designed in a dichotomous fashion (yes or no ) and calculated by percentage of answering yes. it not a scale, the following questions will be asked to the patients;
| after 6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age (18-55) Miller's classI and II multiple GR width of KG>2 mm
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohamed S Saleh, Master | Contact | 01001628350 | mssaleh213@yahoo.com | |
| Hani M Elnahass, PhD | Contact | 01000252603 | Nahass77@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Azza Ezzelarab, PhD | Cairo University | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22140667 | Background | Zadeh HH. Minimally invasive treatment of maxillary anterior gingival recession defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and platelet-derived growth factor BB. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):653-60. | |
| 11022782 | Background | Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1506-14. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005889 | Gingival Recession |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005882 | Gingival Diseases |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| modified coronally advanced flap | Procedure | modified coronally advanced flap with PRF membrane for Treatment of recession class I and II |
|
|
| 24117676 | Background | Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):582-92. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12178. Epub 2013 Nov 10. |
| D055093 |
| Periodontal Atrophy |