Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Procedure Using VISTA Technique Compared to Modified Coronally Advanced Flap Technique in Conjunction With Platelet Rich Fibrin-membrane.

VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession

Comparison between two techniques for root coverage divided in two groups the first (test group) VISTA technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane and the second (control group)MCAF technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane for treating Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects.

Clinical Periodontal Records will be taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months respectively.

Visual analogue scale for pain during one week after operation. Patient satisfaction record using questionnaire after 6 months.

Inclusion Criteria:

- Age (18-55) Miller's classI and II multiple GR width of KG>2 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

• Systemic diseases Poor oral hygiene Smoking Patient allergy Miller's class III and IV