Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Eastern Research Group | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Since 2009, a programmatic community-based strategy (COPE) has been implemented to address health disparities among Navajo individuals living with multiple chronic conditions. COPE (Community Outreach and Patient Empowerment) targets individual, family, and health system-level factors through four activities: 1) coordination between community health representatives (CHRs) and Indian Health Service providers; 2) CHR competency with standardized training; 3) a culturally-sensitive health promotion curriculum for patients and families; and 4) strong CHR supervision.
COPE has been implemented throughout Navajo Nation. Enrollment is programmatic; in other words, the decision to enroll a patient in COPE occurs independently of whether the patient is in this study. Participants receive the COPE intervention in the same manner and intensity, whether they are included in this observational study or not.
The main goal of this observational research is to understand if COPE improves the lives of participating community members. The Primary Aim is to assess the impact of the COPE Project on changes in HbA1c and other CVD risk factors. Hypothesis: Patients enrolled in the COPE program will experience a reduction in HbA1c compared to the control group. Secondary aims are: 1) To understand if COPE improves patients' own self-reported outcomes. Hypothesis: COPE patients will report better health compared with their own baseline at 12 months. 2) To Identify factors associated with increased effectiveness of the COPE Project at the individual, community, and health system level using a mixed-model approach. 3) To understand diverse stakeholder perspectives on COPE impact and value among CHRs, providers and the health care system. Hypothesis: Compared with baseline, CHRs will report greater empowerment in their work, providers will report greater confidence in CHRs.
The observational cohort will be comprised of individuals with diabetes receiving care at one of the participating health facilities. Cases include individuals participating in the COPE intervention; controls are non-COPE participants identified within the same hospital and matched based on similar baseline characteristics. Study findings will improve clinical and patient-decision making and the health of marginalized AI/ANs by informing policies to promote CHR interventions in rural and underserved communities.
Study population: The study will take place on the Navajo Reservation and within Navajo Area IHS clinical facilities. The Navajo Reservation covers over 27,000 square miles in rural New Mexico and Arizona. The proposed evaluation will occur at the six sites, including two which are currently implementing COPE as well as four sites which will implement COPE in the next two years. The health care centers included in this evaluation represent a mix of federally and tribally operated programs and together provide care for over 200,000 individuals. All sites use a common suite of software applications to record electronic health care data: the IHS RPMS (Resource Patient Management System).
Study Design: The research is aligned with PCORI's definition of patient-centered research by answering questions that will allow patients and other stakeholders to make informed health care decisions. This will be completed by incorporating patient input at all stages; comparatively assessing the benefits and weaknesses of COPE; capturing the "voice" of stakeholders through qualitative methods; choosing outcomes that have been cited as relevant to patients' own priorities and decision-making; and studying cross-site variation to capture individual and community factors associated with impact. The study will address the following questions:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| COPE participants | Individuals living with diabetes seen at a study site who were enrolled in the COPE programmatic intervention during the study period. Participation in COPE consists of receiving home visits by a Navajo Community Health Representative (CHR) once or twice a month for a period of at least 12 months. CHRs use structured patient coaching materials to support behavior change. CHRs also check vital signs, monitor blood glucose levels through finger sticks, and facilitate access to appointments and medical refills. CHRs communicate regularly with providers through electronic health record documentation and case management rounds. In-person or telephone communication is be used to address acute issues that may arise. | ||
| Non-COPE participants | Individuals living with diabetes seen at a study site, did not participate in the COPE programmatic intervention, and had comparable baseline characteristics. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Percentage of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | Change in Hemoglobin A1c measured at 24 months, compared with baseline | 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Systolic Blood Pressure | Changes in systolic blood pressure at 24 months, compared with baseline | 24 months |
| Change in Low-density Lipoprotein | Change in low density lipoprotein at 24 months, compared with baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient-reported Good Health | Health status is assessed by three questions using a 5-point scale response to the General Health question from the Short Form 12 survey: "Would you say that in general your health is…" "Compared to your health a year ago, would you say your health is" and "Compared to other people your age, would you say your health is" (Excellent=5, Very Good=4, Good=3, Fair=2, Poor=1), where higher values are more favorable. Binary outcome of Good Health includes "Excellent," "Very good" and "Good" as yes, other responses as no. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Individuals receiving care at a Navajo Area Indian Health Service facility, living with diabetes
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sonya S Shin, MD MPH | Brigham and Women's Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinle Comprehensive Health Care Facility | Chinle | Arizona | 86503 | United States | ||
| Tsehootsooi Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32450874 | Derived | Franz C, Atwood S, Orav EJ, Curley C, Brown C, Trevisi L, Nelson AK, Begay MG, Shin S. Community-based outreach associated with increased health utilization among Navajo individuals living with diabetes: a matched cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 25;20(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05231-4. | |
| 32054623 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Of 28813 individuals screened for eligibility, 3053 were met eligibility criteria and were included (enrolled) in the study
COPE participants are recruited to the program as part of routine care. Providers and CHRs identify individuals with uncontrolled chronic diseases, and invite them to participate in the program. Recruitment is programmatic, and not under research auspices.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | COPE Participants | Individuals with diabetes seen at a study site and enrolled in COPE programmatic intervention during the study period. Participation in COPE consists of receiving home visits by a Navajo Community Health Representative (CHR) once or twice a month for a period of at least 12 months. CHRs deliver structured health coaching, monitor vital signs and blood glucose levels, facilitate access to appointments and medication refills, and communicate with providers to address acute issues that may arise. |
| FG001 | Non-COPE Participants | Individuals living with diabetes seen at a study site, did not participate in the COPE programmatic intervention, and had comparable baseline characteristics . |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study - 24 months |
| |||||||||||||
| 12 months |
|
The numbers for results differ from those of participant flow because the n for each baseline characteristic depended on data available from health record abstractions.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | COPE Participants | Individuals with diabetes seen at a study site and enrolled in COPE programmatic intervention during the study period. Participation in COPE consists of receiving home visits by a Navajo Community Health Representative (CHR) once or twice a month for a period of at least 12 months. CHRs deliver structured health coaching, monitor vital signs and blood glucose levels, facilitate access to appointments and medication refills, and communicate with providers to address acute issues that may arise. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Percentage of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | Change in Hemoglobin A1c measured at 24 months, compared with baseline | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percent | 24 months |
|
24 months
Because this study was an observational, prospective study, adverse events are reported based on routine clinical data during the study period: 1) all-cause mortality; 2) serious adverse events defined as incident cardiovascular disease; 3) non serious adverse events were not collected
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | COPE Participants | Individuals with diabetes seen at a study site and enrolled in COPE programmatic intervention during the study period. Participation in COPE consists of receiving home visits by a Navajo Community Health Representative (CHR) once or twice a month for a period of at least 12 months. CHRs deliver structured health coaching, monitor vital signs and blood glucose levels, facilitate access to appointments and medication refills, and communicate with providers to address acute issues that may arise. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incident CVD | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment | acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, coronary angioplasty, peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid artery disease, cerebrovascular disease |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inpatient hospitalization | Endocrine disorders | Systematic Assessment | Any inpatient hospitalization event, due to any cause. |
This is an observational study using routine clinical data for endpoints other than patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, the participant flow and adverse event reporting did not conform to clinical trial protocols. For patient-reported outcomes, we used mixed methods (including pre-post surveys among a sub-set of COPE participants and qualitative interviews) but did not collect or compare data from a control arm.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Sonya Shin | Brigham and Women's Hospital | 617-872-0310 | sshin@bwh.harvard.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D024821 | Metabolic Syndrome |
| D006973 | Hypertension |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 24 months |
| Change in Body Mass Index | change in body mass index at 24 months, compared with baseline | 24 months |
| Change in Primary Outpatient Services | Primary outpatient encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | 24 months |
| Change in Specialty Outpatient Services | Specialty outpatient encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | 24 months |
| Change in Emergency Services | Emergency encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | 24 months |
| Change in Counseling / Behavioral Services | Counseling / behavioral encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | 24 months |
| Change in Laboratory Services | Laboratory encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | 24 months |
| Change in Radiology Services | Radiology encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | 24 months |
| Change in Pharmacy Services | Pharmacy encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | 24 months |
| Change in Inpatient Services | For inpatient services, the primary data point is the presence of a DRG code indicating the patient was hospitalized. However, we also included clinic listings for labor and delivery and for observation as inpatient utilization. | 24 months |
| Change in Dental Encounters | Dental encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | 24 months |
| Change in Community Encounters | Community encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. Community Encounters may include public health nursing and community health representative visits; however, not all community encounters (e.g. visits by Community Health Representatives in clinics where Community Health Representatives do not document their visits on the RPMS system) may be represented in this database | 24 months |
| 12 months |
| Patient-reported Sense of Control | Sense of control is assessed using a 4-point scale response to the question "Do you feel you are in control of your health?" (Always Never=1, Rarely=2, Sometimes=3, Almost Always=4) with a higher value representing a favorable outcome. Binary outcome derived by including "Almost Always" in "Yes" and "Always never," "Rarely" and "Sometimes" in "No" | 12 months |
| Patient-reported Ability to Cope | Coping will be assessed using a 4-point scale response to two questions "how often have you found that you couldn't cope with all the things that you had to do to?" (Always Never=4, Rarely=3, Sometimes=2, Almost Always=1) and "In the last month, how often have you been upset because of something that happened unexpectedly?" (Always Never=4, Rarely=3, Sometimes=2, Almost Always=1) with a higher value representing a favorable outcome. Binary variables derived by grouping "Always never" and "Rarely" as "Yes" and all others responses as "No" | 12 months |
| Fort Defiance |
| Arizona |
| 86504 |
| United States |
| Kayenta Health Center | Kayenta | Arizona | 86033 | United States |
| Crownpoint Health Center Facility | Crownpoint | New Mexico | 87313 | United States |
| Gallup Indian Medical Center | Gallup | New Mexico | 87301 | United States |
| Northern Navajo Medical Center | Shiprock | New Mexico | 87420 | United States |
| Brown C, Lalla A, Curley C, King C, Muskett O, Salt S, Ray K, Begay MG, Nelson AK, Shin S. Community-clinic linkages: qualitative provider perspectives on partnering with community health representatives in Navajo Nation. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e031794. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031794. |
| 31914997 | Derived | Lalla A, Salt S, Schrier E, Brown C, Curley C, Muskett O, Begay MG, Shirley L, Clark C, Singer J, Shin S, Nelson AK. Qualitative evaluation of a community health representative program on patient experiences in Navajo Nation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4839-x. |
| 31771603 | Derived | Trevisi L, Orav JE, Atwood S, Brown C, Curley C, King C, Muskett O, Sehn H, Nelson KA, Begay MG, Shin SS. Integrating community health representatives with health care systems: clinical outcomes among individuals with diabetes in Navajo Nation. Int J Equity Health. 2019 Nov 27;18(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1097-9. |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG001 | Non-COPE Participants | Individuals living with diabetes seen at a study site, did not participate in the COPE programmatic intervention, and had comparable baseline characteristics . |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Preferred language | Data missing on variable in observational database | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Primary Care Physician | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Essential hypertension | Data missing on variable in observational database | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Major Depressive Disorder | Data missing on variable in observational database | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Major cardiovascular disease | Data missing on variable in observational database | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Dyslipidemia | Data missing on variable in observational database | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Alcohol Use Disorder | Data missing on variable in observational database | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
Individuals living with diabetes seen at a study site, did not participate in the COPE programmatic intervention, and had comparable baseline characteristics . |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure | Changes in systolic blood pressure at 24 months, compared with baseline | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mmHg | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Low-density Lipoprotein | Change in low density lipoprotein at 24 months, compared with baseline | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mg/dl | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Body Mass Index | change in body mass index at 24 months, compared with baseline | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | kg/m^2 | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Primary Outpatient Services | Primary outpatient encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of visits per quarter post enroll | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Specialty Outpatient Services | Specialty outpatient encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of visits per quarter post enroll | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Emergency Services | Emergency encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of visits per quarter post enroll | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Counseling / Behavioral Services | Counseling / behavioral encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of visits per quarter post enroll | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Laboratory Services | Laboratory encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of visits per quarter post enroll | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Radiology Services | Radiology encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | encounters per patient per quarter | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Pharmacy Services | Pharmacy encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each "clinic visit" reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of visits per quarter post enroll | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Inpatient Services | For inpatient services, the primary data point is the presence of a DRG code indicating the patient was hospitalized. However, we also included clinic listings for labor and delivery and for observation as inpatient utilization. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of visits per quarter post enroll | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Dental Encounters | Dental encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. It is notable that the clinic variable includes types of health utilization that are not limited to clinic visits, e.g. inpatient, emergency primary, specialty, dental, counseling/behavioral care. Each clinic visit reported in RPMS is counted as one utilization incident for the purposes of this analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of visits per quarter post enroll | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Community Encounters | Community encounters are identified using the Resource Patient Management System (RPMS) clinic variable. Community Encounters may include public health nursing and community health representative visits; however, not all community encounters (e.g. visits by Community Health Representatives in clinics where Community Health Representatives do not document their visits on the RPMS system) may be represented in this database | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of visits per quarter post enroll | 24 months |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Patient-reported Good Health | Health status is assessed by three questions using a 5-point scale response to the General Health question from the Short Form 12 survey: "Would you say that in general your health is…" "Compared to your health a year ago, would you say your health is" and "Compared to other people your age, would you say your health is" (Excellent=5, Very Good=4, Good=3, Fair=2, Poor=1), where higher values are more favorable. Binary outcome of Good Health includes "Excellent," "Very good" and "Good" as yes, other responses as no. | For this outcome, only pre-post analysis was collected among a subset of COPE participants (rather than COPE v. non-COPE arms) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 months |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Patient-reported Sense of Control | Sense of control is assessed using a 4-point scale response to the question "Do you feel you are in control of your health?" (Always Never=1, Rarely=2, Sometimes=3, Almost Always=4) with a higher value representing a favorable outcome. Binary outcome derived by including "Almost Always" in "Yes" and "Always never," "Rarely" and "Sometimes" in "No" | For this outcome, only pre-post analysis was collected among a subset of COPE participants (rather than COPE v. non-COPE arms) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 months |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Patient-reported Ability to Cope | Coping will be assessed using a 4-point scale response to two questions "how often have you found that you couldn't cope with all the things that you had to do to?" (Always Never=4, Rarely=3, Sometimes=2, Almost Always=1) and "In the last month, how often have you been upset because of something that happened unexpectedly?" (Always Never=4, Rarely=3, Sometimes=2, Almost Always=1) with a higher value representing a favorable outcome. Binary variables derived by grouping "Always never" and "Rarely" as "Yes" and all others responses as "No" | For this outcome, only pre-post analysis was collected among a subset of COPE participants (rather than COPE v. non-COPE arms) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 months |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
| 173 |
| 2 |
| 173 |
| 54 |
| 173 |
| EG001 | Non-COPE Participants | Individuals living with diabetes seen at a study site, did not participate in the COPE programmatic intervention, and had comparable baseline characteristics . | 92 | 2,885 | 3 | 2,885 | 493 | 2,885 |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D007333 | Insulin Resistance |
| D006946 | Hyperinsulinism |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| Superiority |
| Good health compared to a year ago |
|
| Good health compared to other people your age |
|
| Able to cope with unexpected negative events |
|