Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| UCDCC#271 | Other Identifier | UC Davis IRB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of a variety of advanced malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1 / PD-L1 interaction have received FDA approvals for non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, microsatellite instability high colorectal carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. Despite the promising evidence for deep and durable responses with these agents, the majority of patients either fail to respond or develop resistance to treatment. Thus, there is interested in developing alternative immunotherapeutic strategies. The investigators hypothesize that a novel immunotherapeutic combination of radiotherapy (RT) with intralesional CpG and indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase blockade may offer significant clinical benefit to patients and proposing a microtrial testing this combination for advanced/refractory solid tumors and lymphoma.
Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of a variety of advanced malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1 / PD-L1 interaction have received FDA approvals for non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, microsatellite instability high colorectal carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. Despite the promising evidence for deep and durable responses with these agents, the majority of patients either fail to respond or develop resistance to treatment. Thus, there is interested in developing alternative immunotherapeutic strategies. The investigators hypothesize that a novel immunotherapeutic combination of radiotherapy (RT)with intralesional CpG and indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) blockade may offer significant clinical benefit to patients and proposing a microtrial testing this combination for advanced/refractory solid tumors and lymphoma.
Unmethylated CpG DNA is a component bacterial genomes and is the agonist of Toll Like Receptor-9, an endosomal pattern recognition receptor of antigen presenting cells. TLR9 activation results in downstream production of IFN-α, interleukin-6 interleukin-12. These cytokines induce naive T cells to differentiate to helper T cells. CpG has demonstrated significant synergy with radiotherapy to induce regression of refractory systemic and cutaneous lymphomas both within radiation treatment field and un-irradiated metastases. SD-101 is a synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide enriched with CpG motifs.
IDO is an enzyme that converts the essential amino acid tryptophan to kynurenine. The availability of tryptophan is essential to sustaining both helper T cell and effector T cell activation. Overexpression of IDO by tumor cells or antigen presenting cells serves to arrest T cell activation thus acting as an immunosuppressive enzyme. Epacadostat (INCB024360) is an inhibitor of the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) that has shown promise in the treatment of solid tumors and lymphomas in ongoing Phase I/II studies.
The investigators have shown in animal studies that IDO upregulation limits tumor response to RT + CpG and that addition of IDO blockade improves therapeutic efficacy. On the basis of these data, the investigators hypothesize that IDO inhibition will improve upon the known historical efficacy of RT + CpG therapy, and will be highly effective and well tolerated in the management of advanced solid tumors and lymphomas.
This is a phase I/II study. For the phase I portion the primary endpoint is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of epacadostat in combination with radiotherapy and SD-101. For the phase II portion the primary endpoint is safety and toxicity per CTCAE v4.03 criteriae. The secondary endpoint is the abscopal response rate defined as the objective response rate at un-irradiated lesions per irRECIST criteria.
Up to three dose levels of epacadostat will be evaluated: 100 mg bid, 200 mg bid and 300 mg bid each day of the study. Radiotherapy will be delivered to the treatment lesion during the first week using standard-of-care palliative fractionation regimens of 8 Gy x 3 fractions, 4 Gy x 5 fractions, or 2 Gy x 2 fractions. Four milligrams of SD-101 will be delivered into the treatment lesion by intralesional injection on days 1, 8, 15, with optional additional injections on days 22, and 29. On Day 1, biopsy will precede intralesional injection, RT, or epacadostat. Intralesional injections will be performed by palpation of the lesion or under ultrasound or CT guidance as indicated. CT response assessments and labs will be performed every 60 days. Patients will continue on epacadostat until progression.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | All patients will begin epacadostat on day 1 of radiotherapy, which will consist of three threatments over one week. Epacadostat will continue until disease progression or intolerance occurs. On days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, intralesional injectinons of SD101 will be given to patients. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| epacadostat | Drug | Epacadostat will be administered orally, in pill form, twice daily until disease progression. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) | To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epacadostat that can be given with radiotherapy and intralesional SD-101 immunotherapy for the phase I portion of the study. The MTD will be determined using a standard 3+3 design. Patients will be monitored weekly during a 30-day dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period. MTD can be defined as The maximum dose at which <2 of 6 patients experienced a DLT. | Up to 30 days of treatment |
| Incidence of Related Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] | To characterize the safety profile of this regimen using CTCAE v4.03 (Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03) in the phase II expansion . The expansion phase (phase II) will be conducted using the MTD defined as the highest dose at which no more than one of six patients develops a DLT or Dose Level 1 if the MTD is not reached. Patients will be monitored every week during the first 30 days of study and then monthly thereafter up to a period of 1 year. | Through study completion, an average of one year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Abscopal Response Rate | Abscopal Response Rate (ARR) is defined as objective response rate (the percentage of patient that achieve a partial or complete response) at unirradiated sites using irRECIST criteria using imaging obtained every 60 days during the 1 year study period. | Through study completion, an average of one year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults >18 years of age with histologically proven solid malignancy, high-grade lymphoma or low-grade lymphoma.
Patients with incurable, advanced or metastatic disease refractory to at least one previous line of standard of care therapy.
ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status score of 0 - 2 (Appendix 1).
Presence of a candidate treatment lesion (subcutaneous, nodal, or visceral) accessible and safe for radiotherapy and serial intralesional injections as specified by the protocol.
Presence of at least one target lesion (distinct from treatment lesion and outside of treatment lesion radiation field) evaluable for response by irRECIST.
14 day wash-out period from any previous chemotherapy, targeted therapy or radiotherapy, 21 day washout period from previous immunotherapy.
Life expectancy ≥ 6 months.
Adequate hematologic and end organ function, defined by the following laboratory results obtained within 14 days of the first study treatment:
o ANC > 1500 cells/ul; WBC count > 2500/uL; Lymphocyte count >500/uL; Platelet count > 100,000/uL; Hemoglobin > 9 g/dL
Liver function tests meeting one of the following criteria:
INR and aPTT < 1.5 x ULN.
Serum Cr < 1.5 X ULN or CrCl > 50 ml/min.
No active auto-immune disease and not on therapy for auto-immune disease. Patients with a history of autoimmune-related hypothyroidism on a stable dose of thyroid replacement hormone are eligible. Patients who have adrenal insufficiency and hypophysitis from prior immunotherapy if they are on stable medical replacement doses are eligible.
No other active malignancy.
Patients with controlled Type 1 diabetes mellitus on a stable insulin regimen are eligible.
For female patients of childbearing potential and male patients with partners of childbearing potential agreement (by patient and/or partner) to use highly effective form(s) of contraception (i.e., one that results in a low failure rate [<1% per year] when used consistently and correctly) and to continue its use for 6 months after trial completion.
Signed informed consent.
At least 9 months from stem cell transplant with no active graft versus host disease.
Ability to comply with the protocol.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Megan Daly, MD | University of California, Davis | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center | Sacramento | California | 95817 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Experimental | All patients will begin epacadostat on day 1 of radiotherapy, which will consist of three threatments over one week. Epacadostat will continue until disease progression or intolerance occurs. On days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, intralesional injectinons of SD101 will be given to patients. epacadostat: Epacadostat will be administered orally, in pill form, twice daily until disease progression. SD-101: Four milligrams of SD-101 will be delivered into the treatment lesion by intralesional injection on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. Radiotherapy: Radiotherapy will be delivered to the treatment lesion during the first week of ERS therapy. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Experimental | All patients will begin epacadostat on day 1 of radiotherapy, which will consist of three threatments over one week. Epacadostat will continue until disease progression or intolerance occurs. On days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, intralesional injectinons of SD101 will be given to patients. epacadostat: Epacadostat will be administered orally, in pill form, twice daily until disease progression. SD-101: Four milligrams of SD-101 will be delivered into the treatment lesion by intralesional injection on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. Radiotherapy: Radiotherapy will be delivered to the treatment lesion during the first week of ERS therapy. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) | To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epacadostat that can be given with radiotherapy and intralesional SD-101 immunotherapy for the phase I portion of the study. The MTD will be determined using a standard 3+3 design. Patients will be monitored weekly during a 30-day dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period. MTD can be defined as The maximum dose at which <2 of 6 patients experienced a DLT. | Posted | Number | mg | Up to 30 days of treatment |
|
Up to 1 year.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events according CTCAE v4.03
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Experimental | All patients will begin epacadostat on day 1 of radiotherapy, which will consist of three threatments over one week. Epacadostat will continue until disease progression or intolerance occurs. On days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, intralesional injectinons of SD101 will be given to patients. epacadostat: Epacadostat will be administered orally, in pill form, twice daily until disease progression. SD-101: Four milligrams of SD-101 will be delivered into the treatment lesion by intralesional injection on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. Radiotherapy: Radiotherapy will be delivered to the treatment lesion during the first week of ERS therapy. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastrointestinal disorders - Other, specify: lower GI bleed | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst | University of California, Davis | 9167348053 | nlogihara@ucdavis.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 19, 2020 | Nov 10, 2021 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000613752 | epacadostat |
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
All patients will begin epacadostat on day 1 of radiotherapy, which will consist of three threatments over one week. Epacadostat will continue until disease progression or intolerance occurs. On days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, intralesional injectinons of SD101 will be given to patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| SD-101 | Drug | Four milligrams of SD-101 will be delivered into the treatment lesion by intralesional injection on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. |
|
| Radiotherapy | Radiation | Radiotherapy will be delivered to the treatment lesion during the first week of ERS therapy. |
|
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Incidence of Related Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] | To characterize the safety profile of this regimen using CTCAE v4.03 (Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03) in the phase II expansion . The expansion phase (phase II) will be conducted using the MTD defined as the highest dose at which no more than one of six patients develops a DLT or Dose Level 1 if the MTD is not reached. Patients will be monitored every week during the first 30 days of study and then monthly thereafter up to a period of 1 year. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Through study completion, an average of one year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Abscopal Response Rate | Abscopal Response Rate (ARR) is defined as objective response rate (the percentage of patient that achieve a partial or complete response) at unirradiated sites using irRECIST criteria using imaging obtained every 60 days during the 1 year study period. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Through study completion, an average of one year |
|
|
|
| 10 |
| 20 |
| 9 |
| 20 |
| 18 |
| 20 |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Investigations - Other, specify: transanimitis | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders - Other, specify: electrolyte and fluid disorder | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Generalized muscle weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscle weakness lower limb | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) - Other, specify:disease progres | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinus tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Chills | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Edema limbs | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site reaction | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Creatinine increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lymphocyte count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Weight loss | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| White blood cell decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoalbuminemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Generalized muscle weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Paresthesia | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Confusion | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin hyperpigmentation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |