Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluation of the sensitivity of the Merz Cheeks Fullness Assessment Scale (MCFAS) and the clinical relevance of aesthetically pleasing outcomes by detecting changes in cheek appearance after Belotero® Volume Lidocaine injection.
The safety objectives include the identification and description of adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), serious adverse device effects (SADEs), anticipated serious adverse device effects (ASADEs) and unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs) during the course of the study. Additionally, common treatment site responses (CTRs) will be assessed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belotero® Volume Lidocaine | Experimental | Subdermal injection |
|
| No treatment | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belotero® Volume Lidocaine | Device | Mode of application: subdermal injection |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of the responder rate between the treatment group and the untreated control group at Week 4, according to the Merz Cheeks Fullness Assessment Scale (MCFAS) as assessed by a blinded evaluator. | Treatment response is defined as ≥ 1-point improvement on both cheeks compared to baseline. The MCFAS is a 5-point ordinal rating scale ranging from 0 (full cheek) to 5 (very severely sunken cheek). | Week 4 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Descriptive summary of the FACE-Q satisfaction of the midface for treated subjects at baseline and Week 4 | Subject's assessment is based on the entire face. FACE-Q scores are derived from questionaires 'satisfaction with cheeks' (including 5 questions relating to the satisfaction with cheek appearance, answers range from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied)), and the module 'patient-perceived age visual analogue scale' (VAS - scale ranging from -15 (15 years younger) to 15 (15 years older)). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Merz Scientific Expert | Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institute of Cosmetic and Laser Surgery; Merz Inverstigational Site #0010409 | Oakville | Ontario | L6J 7W5 | Canada | ||
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Week 4 |
| Average percent change of the FACE-Q satisfaction of the midface for treated subjects from baseline to Week 4 | Subject's assessment is based on the entire face. FACE-Q scores are derived from questionaires 'satisfaction with cheeks' (including 5 questions relating to the satisfaction with cheek appearance, answers range from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied)), and the module 'patient-perceived age visual analogue scale' (VAS - scale ranging from -15 (15 years younger) to 15 (15 years older)). | Week 4 |
| Descriptive summary of Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores for treated subjects at Week 4, as completed by the treating investigator. | This assessment is a measure of aesthetic improvement relative to the baseline, pre-treatment condition, as assessed from photographs. The Investigator-GAIS is a 7-point scale ranging from -3 (very much worse) to +3 (very much improved). | Week 4 |
| Descriptive summary of GAIS scores for treated subjects at Week 4, as completed by the subject. | This assessment is a measure of aesthetic improvement relative to the baseline, pre-treatment condition, as assessed from photographs. The Investigator-GAIS is a 7-point scale ranging from -3 (very much worse) to +3 (very much improved). | Week 4 |
| Evaluate the incidence and nature of device- and/or injection-related AEs, and SAEs observed during the study. | Week 4 |
| Common treatment site responses (CTRs) will be evaluated using subject diaries | Week 4 |
| Research Toronto; Merz Investigational Site #0010408 |
| Toronto |
| Ontario |
| M4W 2N2 |
| Canada |
| Cosmetic Dermatology Toronto Yorkville; Merz Investigational Site #'0010412 | Toronto | Ontario | M5R 3N8 | Canada |