Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
lack of recruitment and follow up
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Hand and feet lacerations are common in children with repair often requiring conscious sedation and needle sticks for repair. Growing evidence in adults reveal that many of these small lacerations do quite well cosmetically without intervention. This randomized controlled trial will evaluated the cosmetic outcome at 4 months in two groups of children with hand or feet lacerations <2 cm comparing suturing vs conservative wound management.
The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of 2 repair methods in simple (<2cm) hand and feet lacerations in the pediatric population (2-17 yrs). Our hypothesis is that there is no statistical difference in cosmetic outcomes between suture repair and non-repair of these injuries. This study has been performed in the adult population, but has not yet been done in children. The researchers would like to be the first to show that conservative repair can be done in our pediatric population. The suture group will have their injuries repaired with non-absorbable sutures (nylon) which remain the gold standard in cosmetic repair of hands and feet. The conservative group will have identical cleaning and preparation of the wound, but the laceration will be covered with antibiotic ointment and sterile gauze without repair. Secondary outcome measure include patient satisfaction, infection rates, pain during repair, time of initial ED visit stay, and cost of supplies used in repair. Our patients will return in 10 -14 days for follow up and in 4 months for evaluation of the wound and for digital pictures to be taken of the wound. Wounds and scars will be evaluated at both 10 -14 days and 4 months by both the researchers and the parents or care givers. A satisfaction survey will be administered to the parent or guardian. At 3-4 months, digital photographs of the healing lacerations will be graded for appearance by clinicians blinded to the repair method. The initial visit will be billed to their insurance and the follow-up visits will be free.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| conservative | No Intervention | patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the conservative arm - no suturing | |
| suture | Active Comparator | patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the suture arm for repair with nylon suture material |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suture for wound repair | Procedure | Repair of wound with suture |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cosmetic Outcome of Hand and Feet Laceration in Children : Conservative vs Suture Repair | Randomized, parallel group study will compare cosmetic outcome by digital picture by blinded evaluators at 4 months post enrollment. The digital pictures of the laceration repairs were scored using a previously validated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS scale is a 100-mm continuous line that is marked at the right end with "best appearance/scar"(score 100), and on the left end with "worst appearance/scar" (score 0). | 4 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Wound Healing in Hand and Feet Lacerations in Children: Conservative vs Suture Repair | Wound healing by visual inspection at the first follow up visit. The wounds will be evaluated for complications that were defined a priori as follows: "wound infection" was one that required systemic antibiotics as determined by the treating attending physician; and "wound dehiscence" as a wound that required the placement of additional sutures or tissue adhesives. The outcome measure data is reported as the number of participants without the presence of "wound infection" or "wound dehiscence". |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cardinal glennon children's hospital / Division of Emergency Medicine | St Louis | Missouri | 63104 | United States |
if other facilities are performing similar studies would be happy to participate
7/19
By Appointment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Conservative | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the conservative arm - no suturing |
| FG001 | Suture-Non Absorbable | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the suture arm for repair with non-absorbable (nylon) suture material |
| FG002 | Suture-Absorbable | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the suture arm for repair with absorbable) suture material |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Conservative | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the conservative arm - no suturing |
| BG001 | Suture (Absorbable) | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the absorbable suture arm for repair with absorbable suture material |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Ages were not recorded on 4 participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Cosmetic Outcome of Hand and Feet Laceration in Children : Conservative vs Suture Repair | Randomized, parallel group study will compare cosmetic outcome by digital picture by blinded evaluators at 4 months post enrollment. The digital pictures of the laceration repairs were scored using a previously validated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS scale is a 100-mm continuous line that is marked at the right end with "best appearance/scar"(score 100), and on the left end with "worst appearance/scar" (score 0). | No participants in the conservative arm/group of the study completed the study protocol. Only 1 participant in the absorbable suture arm/group of the study and 2 participants in the non-absorbable arm/group of the study completed the study protocol. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale (100-mm VAS) | 4 months |
|
After patients completed their final follow up visit, they were instructed to contact the PI with any concerns about the laceration repair/wound for the time period of 1 year from date of initial repair.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Conservative | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the conservative arm - no suturing |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Trevor L. Tredway | St. Louis University School of Medicine | 314-577-5630 | trevor.tredway@health.slu.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 16, 2020 | Sep 16, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006230 | Hand Injuries |
| D018409 | Foot Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013537 | Sutures |
| D014945 | Wound Healing |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D053831 | Surgical Fixation Devices |
| D013523 | Surgical Equipment |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
| D012038 | Regeneration |
Not provided
Not provided
randomized, parallel group, comparative study
Not provided
Not provided
patients are randomized after informed consent evaluation of cosmetic outcome at 4m is blinded to researchers
| Suture for wound repair |
| Device |
Repair of wound with suture |
|
| 10-14 days |
| Cosmetic Outcome of Hand and Feet Laceration in Children : Conservative vs Suture Repair | Infection rate by visual inspection. The wounds will be evaluated for complications that were defined a priori as follows: "wound infection" was one that required systemic antibiotics as determined by the treating attending physician; and "wound dehiscence" as a wound that required the placement of additional sutures or tissue adhesives. | 10-14 days |
| Cosmetic Outcome of Hand and Feet Laceration in Children : Conservative vs Suture Repair | Rate of wound dehiscence by visual inspection. The wounds will be evaluated for complications that were defined a priori as follows: "wound infection" was one that required systemic antibiotics as determined by the treating attending physician; and "wound dehiscence" as a wound that required the placement of additional sutures or tissue adhesives. | 10-14 days |
| BG002 | Suture (Non-Absorbable) | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the non-absorbable suture arm for repair with non-absorbable suture material |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Mean |
| Standard Deviation |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Suture (Absorbable) | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the absorbable suture arm for repair with absorbable suture material |
| OG002 | Suture (Non-Absorbable) | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the non-absorbable suture arm for repair with non-absorbable suture material |
|
|
| Secondary | Wound Healing in Hand and Feet Lacerations in Children: Conservative vs Suture Repair | Wound healing by visual inspection at the first follow up visit. The wounds will be evaluated for complications that were defined a priori as follows: "wound infection" was one that required systemic antibiotics as determined by the treating attending physician; and "wound dehiscence" as a wound that required the placement of additional sutures or tissue adhesives. The outcome measure data is reported as the number of participants without the presence of "wound infection" or "wound dehiscence". | No participants in the conservative arm/group completed the study. 3 patients in the "absorbable arm" and 4 patients in the "non-absorbable arm" completed the first part and were present for their first follow up.1 of the 3 "absorbable arm" patients completed the entire study and 2 of the 4 "non-absorbable arm" patients completed the entire study. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10-14 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cosmetic Outcome of Hand and Feet Laceration in Children : Conservative vs Suture Repair | Infection rate by visual inspection. The wounds will be evaluated for complications that were defined a priori as follows: "wound infection" was one that required systemic antibiotics as determined by the treating attending physician; and "wound dehiscence" as a wound that required the placement of additional sutures or tissue adhesives. | No participants in the conservative arm/group completed the study protocol | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10-14 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cosmetic Outcome of Hand and Feet Laceration in Children : Conservative vs Suture Repair | Rate of wound dehiscence by visual inspection. The wounds will be evaluated for complications that were defined a priori as follows: "wound infection" was one that required systemic antibiotics as determined by the treating attending physician; and "wound dehiscence" as a wound that required the placement of additional sutures or tissue adhesives. | No participants in the conservative arm/group completed the study protocol | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 10-14 days |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 4 |
| EG001 | Suture (Absorbable) | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the suture absorbable arm for repair with absorbable suture material | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| EG002 | Suture (Non-Absorbable) | Patient fulfilling entry criteria will be randomized to the suture non-absorbable arm for repair with non-absorbable suture material | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D001686 |
| Biological Phenomena |
| Male |
|