Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| LUC-2017-001 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Lucerno Dynamics, LLC |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recruitment slow due to improved extravasation rate.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Lucerno Dynamics, LLC | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A widely used semi-quantitative parameter to assess tumor status is the standardized uptake value (SUV). SUV estimation accuracy can be impacted by many variables. Today there still exists a significant amount of variability in PET/CT results in test and re-test studies. This variability can be introduced by instrumentation and subject-specific factors. Variability reduces image quality and increases the required changes in tumor quantification to reflect real tumor response or progression.
PET/CT scanning process requires that the entire net injected dose of radiolabeled tracer is administered intravenously as a bolus. The quality and quantification of a PET/CT image is highly dependent on the uptake of radiolabeled tracer. Boellaard et al. have indicated infiltrations could potentially underestimate SUV measurements by as much as 50%. Infiltrations and obstructions are not uncommon.
Recent studies using a novel QA/QC tool (LaraTM System) for the radiotracer injection process revealed that current means to detect infiltration do not completely identify all infiltrations/obstructions. Since infiltrations may not be visible in the standard field of view (FOV) and since the impact of a peripheral circulatory obstruction may not be visible even if an injection site is in the FOV, it is possible for reading and treating physicians to be unaware that a patient's image and quantification has been impacted. Additionally, when current means do detect an infiltration, they under-represent the severity because they are not capturing that infiltrations often resolve during the uptake period. As a result, infiltrations or obstructions may cause SUV inaccuracy and could adversely impact staging and tumor assessments.
The purpose of this study will be to characterize the impact of moderate or greater infiltrations on standardized uptake values. Patients experiencing a moderate or greater infiltration on a routine clinical PET scan will be invited to return for a repeat scan with injection performed by specially trained personnel to reduce the risk of repeat infiltration. The two scans will be compared to assess for changes in tumor uptake intensity.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infiltration | Experimental | Repeat F-18 FDG PET |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-18 FDG PET | Diagnostic Test | Repeat scan performed by specially trained staff to reduce risk of repeat infiltration. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in SUVpeak of Target Lesions Between Infiltrated and Non-infiltrated Scans | Target lesions selected as per PERCIST criteria. These criteria require more space than allowed to explain. Reference J Nucl Med 2009; 50: 122S-150S. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307 | Baseline scan and follow up scan within 7 days |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Metabolic Tumor Volume of Target Lesions Between Infiltrated and Non-infiltrated Scans | Metabolic tumor volume to be measured using threshold defined in PERCIST criteria | 7 days |
| Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis of Target Lesions Between Infiltrated and Non-infiltrated Scans |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Shane C Masters, MD, PhD | Wake Forest Baptist Health, Department of Radiology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wake Forest Baptist Health | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27157 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22655246 | Background | Osman MM, Muzaffar R, Altinyay ME, Teymouri C. FDG Dose Extravasations in PET/CT: Frequency and Impact on SUV Measurements. Front Oncol. 2011 Nov 16;1:41. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2011.00041. eCollection 2011. | |
| 24784399 | Background | Silva-Rodriguez J, Aguiar P, Sanchez M, Mosquera J, Luna-Vega V, Cortes J, Garrido M, Pombar M, Ruibal A. Correction for FDG PET dose extravasations: Monte Carlo validation and quantitative evaluation of patient studies. Med Phys. 2014 May;41(5):052502. doi: 10.1118/1.4870979. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Infiltration | Repeat F-18 FDG PET F-18 FDG PET: Repeat scan performed by specially trained staff to reduce risk of repeat infiltration. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Infiltration | Repeat F-18 FDG PET F-18 FDG PET: Repeat scan performed by specially trained staff to reduce risk of repeat infiltration. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in SUVpeak of Target Lesions Between Infiltrated and Non-infiltrated Scans | Target lesions selected as per PERCIST criteria. These criteria require more space than allowed to explain. Reference J Nucl Med 2009; 50: 122S-150S. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307 | Up to 5 target lesions measured per participant (4 for this subject) with mean and standard deviation reported below. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | SUV (dimensionless) | Baseline scan and follow up scan within 7 days |
|
|
All subjects assessed from enrollment to study closure. For the subject with data recorded, approximately 5 months between enrollment and study closure.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Infiltration | Repeat F-18 FDG PET F-18 FDG PET: Repeat scan performed by specially trained staff to reduce risk of repeat infiltration. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospitalization | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Non-systematic Assessment | Subject hospitalized 4 days after initial PET scan due to abdominal pain ongoing prior to enrollment, attributed to the malignancy that prompted the PET scan. Repeat scan had not yet happened at this time. |
Not provided
Early study termination due to slow subject accrual with resulting sample size too small for analysis. This was mainly due to improvement in injection techniques and lower than expected extravasation rate.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katie Holbrook Bingman | Wake Forest Baptist Health | 336-713-7765 | krholbro@wakehealth.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 19, 2017 | Feb 13, 2019 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Mar 21, 2018 | May 8, 2020 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
All patients with a moderate or greater infiltration on a routine F-18 FDG PET will be invited to return for a repeat scan.
Not provided
Not provided
Reader will not be informed which scan was infiltrated.
Not provided
Total lesion glycolysis is calculated for the same metabolic tumor volume as Outcome 2 |
| 7 days |
| Change in Estimated Tumor Stage or Predicted Response to Therapy Between Infiltrated and Non-infiltrated Scans | Response is defined per PERCIST criteria | 7 days |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Initial Lara TAC score | Range of values is -infinity to infinity. Less than 0 is considered non-extravasated. Greater than 1000 is considered at least moderate extravasation Larger values indicate greater severity of extravasation. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Metabolic Tumor Volume of Target Lesions Between Infiltrated and Non-infiltrated Scans | Metabolic tumor volume to be measured using threshold defined in PERCIST criteria | Not Posted | 7 days | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis of Target Lesions Between Infiltrated and Non-infiltrated Scans | Total lesion glycolysis is calculated for the same metabolic tumor volume as Outcome 2 | Not Posted | 7 days | Participants |
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Estimated Tumor Stage or Predicted Response to Therapy Between Infiltrated and Non-infiltrated Scans | Response is defined per PERCIST criteria | Not Posted | 7 days | Participants |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
|
Not provided