Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of ExAblate Neuro treatment of chronic trigeminal neuropathic pain.
This study is to show that for patients with treatment-refractory chronic trigeminal neuropathic pain, ExAblate Neuro focused ultrasound (FUS) can safely create lesions bilaterally in the thalamic nuclei to reduce pain and provide functional benefits in daily activities. After informed consent and screening, eligible subjects will be randomized to either an ExAblate treatment or a Sham Control procedure. Subjects who are randomized to Sham Control will undergo the same procedure and follow-up visits through their Month 3 visit. After the Month 3 assessments are complete, all subjects will be un-blinded and those in the Sham treated group will have the option for an actual ExAblate treatment in an un-blinded fashion, as long as they still qualify for ExAblate treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcranial ExAblate | Experimental | ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) |
|
| Sham Transcranial ExAblate | Sham Comparator | ExAblate MRgFUS Sham Procedure |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcranial ExAblate | Device | ExAblate Thalamotomy for Chronic Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Severity of Device and Procedure Related Complications | To evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse events associated with ExAblate lesioning of the bilateral medial thalamus for painful neuropathies of the face and head that are severe and treatment-refractory. | At the time of ExAblate Transcranial thalamotomy procedure through 3-months post-thalamotomy |
| Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) change in worst pain experienced over 24 hours before and at 3 months following bilateral FUS medial thalamotomy versus sham procedures was determined from the 11-point numeric pain rating scale with 0 as no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable. High NPRS scores are worse pain (0 is no pain, 10 is maximum). Percent change from Baseline at Month 3 was calculated as follows: 100*(NPRS Score at Baseline - NPRS Score at Month 3)/NPRS Score at Baseline. High percent change in NPRS Score from Baseline is better (improved pain). | Percent Change in NPRS from before treatment to 3 Months following treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Interference Scale 8a v1.0 From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Pain Inventory | The Pain Interference 8a v1.0 Scale (Short Form) from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Pain Inventory is an 8-item patient completed short form with each item on a 5-point scale (0-4). The total score possible ranges from 0-32. The PROMIS pain interference scale measures the degree to which pain interferes with activities of daily living. A high percent change from Baseline at 3 Months post-treatment is better, shows improvement. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Craniofacial pain syndromes related to malignancy of the head and neck
Idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia
Headache syndromes like migraine, cluster headache
Temporomandibular joint syndrome
Atypical facial pain or pain related to a somatoform disorder
Subjects with active psychiatric illness will be excluded. For the purpose of this study, active psychiatric illness includes:
Any presence or history of psychosis will be excluded.
Subjects with unstable cardiac status including:
Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication)
Subjects with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
Receiving anticoagulant (e.g. warfarin) or antiplatelet (e.g. aspirin) therapy within one week of focused ultrasound procedure or drugs known to increase risk or hemorrhage (e.g. Avastin) within one month of focused ultrasound procedure
Individuals who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary supine position during treatment (can be up to 4 hours of total table time.)
Subjects participating or have participated in another clinical trial in the last 30 days
Presence of systemic neurological disease or dysfunction
Known life-threatening systemic disease
Subjects with brain tumors or any significant intracranial mass. Trigeminal or cavernous sinus tumors causing neuropathic pain are not excluded.
Pregnancy or lactation
Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
Subjects with a deep brain stimulation implant or with a prior stereotactic thalamic ablation
History of hemorrhagic stroke or cerebrovascular event within the past year of treatment exhibiting incomplete resolution
History of seizures within past year of treatment
Severe kidney disease or on dialysis
Subjects who are unable to tolerate medications due to intolerable side effects.
Subjects with pain other than craniofacial neuropathic pain.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| William J Elias, MD | University of Virginia | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38157521 | Derived | Ishaque M, Moosa S, Urban L, Kundu B, Qureshi Z, Spears T, Fletcher PT, Donahue J, Patel SH, Goldstein RB, Finan PH, Liu CC, Elias WJ. Bilateral focused ultrasound medial thalamotomies for trigeminal neuropathic pain: a randomized controlled study. J Neurosurg. 2023 Dec 29;140(6):1799-1809. doi: 10.3171/2023.10.JNS23661. Print 2024 Jun 1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) Only | ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) Transcranial ExAblate: ExAblate Thalamotomy for Chronic Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain |
| FG001 | Sham Transcranial ExAblate First, Then Optional Transcranial Exablate (MRgFUS) | ExAblate MRgFUS Sham Procedure Sham Transcranial ExAblate: Sham ExAblate Thalamotomy procedure |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main Randomized Study |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Crossover Transcranial Exablate |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) Only | ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) Transcranial ExAblate: ExAblate Thalamotomy for Chronic Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain |
| BG001 | Sham Transcranial ExAblate First, Then Optional Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Severity of Device and Procedure Related Complications | To evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse events associated with ExAblate lesioning of the bilateral medial thalamus for painful neuropathies of the face and head that are severe and treatment-refractory. | Not Posted | Oct 2023 | At the time of ExAblate Transcranial thalamotomy procedure through 3-months post-thalamotomy | Participants | ||||||||||
| Primary | Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) change in worst pain experienced over 24 hours before and at 3 months following bilateral FUS medial thalamotomy versus sham procedures was determined from the 11-point numeric pain rating scale with 0 as no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable. High NPRS scores are worse pain (0 is no pain, 10 is maximum). Percent change from Baseline at Month 3 was calculated as follows: 100*(NPRS Score at Baseline - NPRS Score at Month 3)/NPRS Score at Baseline. High percent change in NPRS Score from Baseline is better (improved pain). |
Adverse event data were collected though 3 months post-thalamotomy.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Transcranial ExAblate (MRgFUS) | ExAblate Transcranial MR Guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) Transcranial ExAblate: ExAblate Thalamotomy for Chronic Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worsening pain | General disorders | Custom | Non-systematic Assessment | Worsening pain. The subject in the sham group experienced worsening facial pain due to progression of neuropathic pain. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatigue | General disorders | Custom | Non-systematic Assessment | Procedure related |
This is a pilot study with limited sample size.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadir Alikacem, VP Global Regulated Clinical Affairs | Insightec | 214-630-9900 | NadirA@Insightec.com |
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 6, 2019 | Sep 7, 2023 | Prot_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects were randomized to an Exablate Test Arm or a Sham Control Arm. After completing the Month 3 Sham study visit, Sham Controls could elect to receive the actual Exablate ablation (same as test arm) and continue follow-up in a "Crossover Arm."
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sham Transcranial ExAblate | Device | Sham ExAblate Thalamotomy procedure |
|
| Crossover Transcranial Exablate | Device | Subjects randomized to the Sham Exablate could opt for the Crossovover Transcranial Exablate Arm (Exablate Thalamotomy) after completing the Month 3 visit in the Sham Arm. |
|
|
| From pre-treatment through 3 months following treatment. |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
ExAblate MRgFUS Sham Procedure Sham Transcranial ExAblate: Sham ExAblate Thalamotomy procedure Crossover Transcranial Exablate: Subjects randomized to the Sham Exablate could opt for the Crossovover Transcranial Exablate Arm (Exablate Thalamotomy) after completing the Month 3 visit in the Sham Arm. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Posted |
| Mean |
| Standard Deviation |
| Percent change |
| Percent Change in NPRS from before treatment to 3 Months following treatment. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pain Interference Scale 8a v1.0 From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Pain Inventory | The Pain Interference 8a v1.0 Scale (Short Form) from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Pain Inventory is an 8-item patient completed short form with each item on a 5-point scale (0-4). The total score possible ranges from 0-32. The PROMIS pain interference scale measures the degree to which pain interferes with activities of daily living. A high percent change from Baseline at 3 Months post-treatment is better, shows improvement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | From pre-treatment through 3 months following treatment. |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 5 |
| 0 |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| EG001 | Sham Transcranial ExAblate First | ExAblate MRgFUS Sham Procedure Sham Transcranial ExAblate: Sham ExAblate Thalamotomy procedure | 0 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| EG002 | Optional Crossover Transcranial Exablate (MRgFUS) | After completing the 3 Month Visit sham subjects were given the opportunity to receive the Exablate treatment and continue follow-up in the Crossover Group. | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
|
| Sleepiness | General disorders | Custom | Systematic Assessment | Procedure related |
|
| Headache | General disorders | Custom | Systematic Assessment | Procedure related |
|
| Cold sensation | General disorders | Custom | Systematic Assessment | Transient pain/discomfort, resolved within 72 hours. |
|
| Sonication pain | General disorders | Custom | Non-systematic Assessment | Transient pain/discomfort, resolved within 72 hours. |
|
| Unsteadiness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Custom | Systematic Assessment | Procedure related |
|
| Tight sensation | General disorders | Custom | Systematic Assessment | Transient pain/discomfort, resolved within 72 hours |
|
| Facial edema | Surgical and medical procedures | Custom | Systematic Assessment | Stereotactic frame related |
|
| Nausea/vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Custom | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Numbness/tingling | Gastrointestinal disorders | Custom | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transient headache | General disorders | Custom | Systematic Assessment | Transient, resolved within 72 hours |
|
| Head pain | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Custom | Systematic Assessment | Stereotactic frame related |
|
| Pin site pain | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Custom | Systematic Assessment | Stereotactic frame related |
|
Not provided
Not provided