Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective multi-center clinical evaluation following recipients of the G7 Dual Mobility hip device. The primary objective is to characterize survivorship of the G7 hip at five years post-index procedure. Secondary objectives include documentation of clinical outcomes, safety and radiographic data.
This multi-center prospective follow-up study will evaluate clinical outcomes, functional outcomes, radiological outcomes and further characterize the safety profile of the G7 Dual Mobility Hip Arthroplasty System. This will be accomplished by assessing these domains using the Harris Hip Score, UCLA Activity Score, and EQ-5D-3L, obtaining and assessing radiographs and the tracking of device or procedure related adverse events. Subjects will undergo unilateral primary or revision total hip arthroplasty and will then be followed for 10 years with intervals at 6 weeks, 1-, 2-, 3- 5- and 10 years. For the 10 year visit, subjects will not be required to present in their doctor's office, but will fill out a survey. Subsequent to 10 year data collection, the subject's participation in the study will be compete.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G7 Dual Mobility hip | Device | Total hip arthroplasty and implantation of the G7 device |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Survivorship of the study device | This is assessed by removal of the study device from the patient for any reason, including failure of the device, infection, or traumatic injury. | 5 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radiographic measurements of the implanted device | Standard AP radiographs of implanted hip will assess the positioning of the device as well as lucencies and other potential anomalies. | 10 years |
| Frequency and incidence of adverse events for all subjects with particular focus on those related or potentially related to the device |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients who are undergoing revision hip arthroplasty
-OR
Patients who are undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the correction of a functional deformity
- OR
Patients in need of treatment of femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable by other techniques
- OR
Patients suffer from substantial pain and/or limited function, are appropriate for a primary total hip arthroplasty, considered at high risk for dislocation and have one of the following:
Decision to have a G7 Dual Mobility system implanted was made independently and prior to recruitment into study
From 18 to 80 years of age (inclusive) at time of procedure
BMI equal to or less than 35
Unilateral total hip replacement
Willing and able to comply with the study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty following non-union of previous surgically treated fracture.
Infection, sepsis or osteomyelitis at the affected joint
Significant osteoporosis as defined by treating surgeon
Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation
Osteomalacia
Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site
Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption on preoperative radiographs
Underwent contralateral THA within 12 months of planned index procedure
Contralateral THA planned within 12 months of index procedure
Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy at the implant site or neuromuscular disease
The patient is
The patient has any concomitant disease which is likely to jeopardize the functioning or success of the implant
The patient is known to be pregnant
The patient has a known sensitivity or allergy to one or more of the implanted materials, inducing but not limited to chromium, cobalt, and ceramic
Not provided
Not provided
All patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty, undergoing a hip arthroplasty to correct a functional deformity, patients seeking treatment for femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable by other techniques, and patients with significant hip pain or functional limitations and who are at a high dislocation risk will be considered for the study. Patients may have avascular necrosis, osteo- or rheumatoid arthritis.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hillary Overholser, MS | Zimmer Biomet | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jersey City Medical Center | Jersey City | New Jersey | 07302 | United States | ||
| New Mexico Orthopaedics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Assessed by tracking the type of adverse event, severity and relation of the event(s) to the study device |
| 10 years |
| Patient Physical Activity | UCLA activity score - patient self assessment | 10 years |
| Patient Quality of Life | EQ-3L-5D quality of life measure - patient self assessment | 10 years |
| Harris Hip Score | Harris Hip score measures pain, function, absence of deformity, and range of motion. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores representing less dysfunction and better outcomes | 10 years |
| Albuquerque |
| New Mexico |
| 87106 |
| United States |
| University of North Carolina | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| Oregon Health and Science University | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| Tidewater Orthopaedics | Hampton | Virginia | 23666 | United States |
| Ortho Virginia | Richmond | Virginia | 23235 | United States |