The Effect of Entecavir Consolidation on Post-TDF Treatment Durability

The Effect of Entecavir Consolidation on Post-TDF Treatment Durability

Clinical relapse occurred much earlier and tended to be more severe after cessation of TDF than ETV. The follow-up interval and intensity would be different between ETV and TDF after discontinuation of therapy. Whether switch therapy from TDF to ETV can modify the pattern of relapse is interesting but unclear. Our hypothesis is that entecavir consolidation on post-TDF treatment patients reduce and delay the clinical relapse effectively. Hence in this proof of concept study we would like to evaluate the effect of 6 months and 12 months of entecavir consolidation on post-TDF treatment durability.

Long term nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs) treatment is required in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). According to current treatment guidelines from APASL 2015, NAs treatment can be stopped if, after HBsAg loss following either anti-HBs seroconversion or at least 12 months of a post-HBsAg clearance consolidation period or after treatment for at least 2 years with undetectable HBV DNA documented on three separate occasions, 6 months apart. In Taiwan, the National Health Insurance system only reimburse 3 years NAs for CHB patients. Previous study from Jeng et al. suggested that the 1-year rate of clinical relapse (HBV DNA>2,000 IU/mL plus ALT>2X ULN) after cessation of entecavir(ETV) therapy by APASL stopping rule (treatment >2 years, HBV DNA undetectable >1 year) in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients was 45%, of which 25.6% occurred within 6 months. Recently, another study from Jeng et al showed that 34 HBeAg(-) patients who stopped TDF therapy by APASL stopping rule were followed-up every 1-3 months for >6 months. Of these 34 patients, mean age was 51.8 years, 82.4% were males and 14(41.2%) were cirrhotic. The 1-year cumulative clinical relapse rate was 46%, of which 93.3% occurred within 6 months, and 13.3% developed decompensation. Clinical relapse occurred much earlier and tended to be more severe after cessation of TDF than ETV. The follow-up interval and intensity would be different between ETV and TDF after discontinuation of therapy. Whether switch therapy from TDF to ETV can modify the pattern of relapse is interesting but unclear. Our hypothesis is that entecavir consolidation on post-TDF treatment patients reduce and delay the clinical relapse effectively. Hence in this proof of concept study we would like to evaluate the effect of 6 months and 12 months of entecavir consolidation on post-TDF treatment durability.

Inclusion Criteria:

• >20 yrs old.
• No history of Lamivudine or telbivudine resistance.
• HBsAg positive for more than 6 months.
• HBeAg (-).
• HBeAg-negative CHB under TDF treatment for mora than 2 years and fulfilled APASL 2012 guideline's stopping rule: HBeAg (-): undetectable HBV DNA on 3 separate occasions at least 6 months apart.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Lamivudine/telbivudine resistance.
• HBeAg (+).
• HIV, HCV co-infection.
• Under immunosuppressant treatment (including steroid and biologics).