Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Denosumab 60 mg produced by AryoGen Pharmed and Amgen Denosumab 60 mg among osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis according to their Bone mineral density result (BMD), aged between 45 to 75 are included in this trial. This is a Phase III, randomized, two armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled,non-inferiority clinical trial. The eligible patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive Arylia or Prolia® subcutaneous injections, at the beginning of the trial and every 6 months at month 6 and 12, in an 18-month study period. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study.
The primary objective of this study is to assess non-inferiority of test- Denosumab 60 mg (Arylia) to the reference Denosumab 60 mg (Prolia®) in terms of efficacy among osteoporotic postmenopausal women.
The secondary objectives of this study are:
To further compare efficacy of test- Denosumab 60 mg to reference Denosumab 60 mg; To assess the safety of test- Denosumab 60 mg compared to reference Denosumab 60 mg.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Denosumab 60 mg produced by AryoGen Pharmed and Amgen Denosumab 60 mg among osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis according to their Bone mineral density result (BMD) and aged between 45 to 75 are included in this trial. This is a Phase III, randomized, two armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled,non-inferiority clinical trial. Visits are going to be conducted at screening, 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months.
After signing the written informed consent, patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive Arylia or Prolia® subcutaneous injections, at the beginning of the trial and every 6 months at month 6 and 12, in an 18-month study period. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study.
The primary objective of this study is to assess percentage change from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to 18 months of the study, and compare it between two treatment groups.
The second objectives of this study are to assess the followings between treatment groups:
Before initiation, the trial is reviewed by food and drug administration of Iran. The protocol, electronic case report form (eCRF), information for patients and informed consent forms are submitted to the ethics committees responsible for review and approval purposes, according to national regulatory guidelines.
Sample size:
172 patients will be equally (1:1) divided into intervention arms for achieving 80% power in order to determine non-inferiority using a one-sided, independent sample t-test. Efficacy of Prolia® in comparison with placebo for lumbar spine BMD improvement in previous studies is reported 7.1%. The margin of non-inferiority is 1.78. The true difference between the means is assumed to be 0.000. The significance level (alpha) of the test is 0.025. The data are drawn from populations with standard deviations of 4.116 and 4.116. However, we have calculated that 190 patients should enter the study, by considering that there might be 10% drop-outs of participants during the trial.
Blinding:
To prevent the influence of knowing intervention group on study conclusion, the subjects and those who assess the study outcomes will be unaware of the state of the patient with regard to receiving the test drug or reference drug.
For this purpose, subjects and administrator of the drug will be blinded by using a similar masked prefilled syringes. All drugs packages will be identified by unique numbers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| AryoGen Pharmed Denosumab | Experimental | Arylia (Denosumab Prefilled Syringe produced by AryoGen Pharmed) 60 mg/1 ml in a prefilled syringe. Denosumab 60 mg is subcutaneously administered to osteoporotic patients at baseline, month 6 and month 12. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study. |
|
| Amgen Denosumab | Active Comparator | Prolia® (Denosumab Prefilled Syringe produced by Amgen) 60 mg/1 ml in a prefilled syringe. Denosumab 60 mg is subcutaneously administered to osteoporotic patients at baseline, month 6 and month 12. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denosumab | Drug | Denosumab 60 mg is subcutaneously administered to osteoporotic patients at baseline, month 6 and month 12. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| BMD percentage change from baseline at lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip. | Percentage change from baseline in BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to 18 months of the study, and compare between two groups. | Baseline and at 18 months. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The incidence of new vertebral fracture. | The incidence of new vertebral fracture assessed by Lateral spine X-ray radiography (T4-L4) at baseline then at 18 months, and compare between two groups. | Baseline and at 18 months |
| Evolution of biochemical markers of bone metabolism. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rheumatology Center of Iran | Tehran | 021 | Iran |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25760281 | Background | Lim SY, Bolster MB. Current approaches to osteoporosis treatment. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 May;27(3):216-24. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000169. | |
| 26163201 | Background | Drake MT, Clarke BL, Lewiecki EM. The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Clin Ther. 2015 Aug;37(8):1837-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jul 7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Sep 9, 2022 | |
| Reset | Jul 28, 2023 | |
| Release | Sep 27, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| calcium | Dietary Supplement | All women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided in two doses), during 18 month of the study. |
|
| vitamin D | Dietary Supplement | All women will receive daily supplements containing at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 month of the study. |
|
Evolution of biochemical markers of bone metabolism at baseline, first month and afterwards every 3 months from baseline, and compare between two groups. |
| Baseline,at month 1,at month 3,at month 6,at month 9, at month 12, at month 15 and at month 18. |
| Comparing adverse events between two products. | Evaluation of the following parameters at each visit including 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months, and compare between two groups.
| baseline,at month 1,at month 3,at month 6,at month 9,at month 12, at month 15 and at month 18. |
| Comparing immunogenicity between two products. | Evaluation of immunogenicity at visit 0, 6, 12 and 18 months for both arms, and compare between two groups. | Baseline,at month 6,at month 12 and at month 18. |
| 25182228 | Background | Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R; National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2359-81. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2. Epub 2014 Aug 15. |
| 26508890 | Background | Cairoli E, Eller-Vainicher C, Chiodini I. Update on denosumab in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient preference and adherence. Int J Womens Health. 2015 Oct 13;7:833-9. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S75681. eCollection 2015. |
| 26639186 | Background | Diedhiou D, Cuny T, Sarr A, Norou Diop S, Klein M, Weryha G. Efficacy and safety of denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis: A systematic review. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2015 Dec;76(6):650-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Nov 27. |
| 26923729 | Background | Herrero S, Pico Y. Treatments for post-menopausal osteoporotic women, what's new? How can we manage long-term treatment? Eur J Pharmacol. 2016 May 15;779:8-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.02.053. Epub 2016 Feb 26. |
| 26789873 | Background | Black DM, Rosen CJ. Clinical Practice. Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 21;374(3):254-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1513724. |
| 19671655 | Background | Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C; FREEDOM Trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):756-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809493. Epub 2009 Aug 11. |
| 16495394 | Background | McClung MR, Lewiecki EM, Cohen SB, Bolognese MA, Woodson GC, Moffett AH, Peacock M, Miller PD, Lederman SN, Chesnut CH, Lain D, Kivitz AJ, Holloway DL, Zhang C, Peterson MC, Bekker PJ; AMG 162 Bone Loss Study Group. Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 23;354(8):821-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044459. |
| 18767928 | Background | Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, Recker RR, Kiel DP, de Gregorio LH, Hadji P, Hofbauer LC, Alvaro-Gracia JM, Wang H, Austin M, Wagman RB, Newmark R, Libanati C, San Martin J, Bone HG. Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jan;24(1):153-61. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.0809010. |
| 26554766 | Background | Gu HF, Gu LJ, Wu Y, Zhao XH, Zhang Q, Xu ZR, Yang YM. Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Nov;94(44):e1674. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001674. |
| 18381571 | Background | Bone HG, Bolognese MA, Yuen CK, Kendler DL, Wang H, Liu Y, San Martin J. Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jun;93(6):2149-57. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2814. Epub 2008 Apr 1. |
| 35773713 | Derived | Jamshidi A, Vojdanian M, Soroush M, Akbarian M, Aghaei M, Hajiabbasi A, Mirfeizi Z, Khabbazi A, Alishiri G, Haghighi A, Salimzadeh A, Karimzadeh H, Shirani F, Fard MRH, Nazarinia M, Soroosh S, Anjidani N, Gharibdoost F. Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia(R)) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Jun 30;24(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02840-8. |
| Reset | Mar 28, 2024 |
| Release | May 15, 2024 |
| Reset | Sep 20, 2024 |
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2022 | Jul 28, 2023 | |||
| Sep 27, 2023 | Mar 28, 2024 | |||
| May 15, 2024 | Sep 20, 2024 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010024 | Osteoporosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001851 | Bone Diseases, Metabolic |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069448 | Denosumab |
| D002118 | Calcium |
| D014807 | Vitamin D |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
| D008673 | Metals, Alkaline Earth |
| D004602 | Elements |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D008670 | Metals |
| D001779 | Blood Coagulation Factors |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |
| D012632 | Secosteroids |
| D013256 | Steroids |
| D000072473 | Fused-Ring Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided