Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Breast cancer remains a major killer of women and despite major advances in care, the role of 'environmental factors' in the disease remain to be well understood. The investigators have shown that one such factor is the bacteria that inhabit the breast tissue. These bacteria do not cause infections per se, but can produce low amounts of substances known to be able to induce cancer. The investigators have found that the bacteria in the breasts of women with cancer are very different from those found in the breast tissue of healthy women. The investigators would like to test their theory that taking probiotic lactobacilli by mouth can lead to these organisms reaching the breast tissue and help to displace the harmful bacteria and reduce inflammation which has close links to cancer.
Certain bacteria, particularly Gram negatives, are major causes of inflammation. In fact, the lipopolysaccharides from these bacteria are used in vast numbers of studies to induce inflammation and study disease. Many cancers are the result of inflammatory processes. Breast cancer is a major cause of illness and death in women and inflammatory processes are one of the foci of investigation; however, not yet from the stand point that bacteria in the breast may be the instigators of cancer development. The investigators were the first in the world to describe the breast microbiota and show that the bacterial profiles are more pathogenic in women with cancer than in tissues of healthy controls. This work has been validated by others. Although this does not prove a cause-and-effect link with breast cancer, such linkages have been shown in stomach and colon cancers. If researchers assume there is a link, then how can the inflammatory microbiota be re-set to one that is somehow beneficial and able to reduce inflammation and potential cancer induction?
The concept of probiotics emerged from the quest to reset the disrupted microbiota of the gut and upper respiratory tract. This investigational group has led the world in doing the same in the urogenital tract of women.
The researchers would like to test their theory that taking probiotic lactobacilli by mouth can lead to these organisms reaching the breast tissue and helping displace the harmful bacteria and reducing inflammation. A study in Spain has shown that oral intake of probiotic lactobacilli can not only cure mastitis, but lead to the lactobacilli reaching the milk glands. Women who breast feed for more than six months (and thereby pass along lactic acid bacteria to the infant from the breast milk) have a reduced risk of breast cancer.
The investigators hypothesize that the breast microbiome of women at risk of cancer has the same profile as women with cancer and that oral administration of probiotic lactobacilli can reset this to one found in healthy women. They also hypothesize the breast tissue of these at-risk patients is contaminated by environmental toxins.
The project plan is to test the concept of re-setting the breast tissue microbiota in women at risk of cancer, to one more aligned with health.
Samples will be tested for relative bacterial abundance to determine any shift in bacterial breast tissue composition by next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics. Samples will also be tested for inflammatory markers using Luminex technology, and for mercury, arsenic and pesticides using LC-MS as described in previous studies.
Twenty women at high-risk for breast cancer (See Inclusion Criteria) will be randomized (10 each) to receive either probiotic or placebo, once a day for 90 days. This capsule is approved in Canada and widely available and contains 2.5 billion CFU viable bacterial cells of each of the following strains: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14. Both active capsules and placebo will be provided by the manufacturer Chr Hansen (Denmark). Samples will be collected at t=0 (enrollment), t=1 (end of 90 days) and t=2(30 days post-treatment).
Twenty women will act as healthy controls (See Inclusion Criteria) and will be randomized (10 each) as described above for the high-risk group.
At each time point, samples collected will include:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-B | Experimental | One capsule contains 2.5 billion CFU of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo. It is the same composition as the active capsule, without the bacteria. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic Natural Health Product - RepHresh Pro-B | Dietary Supplement | Participants will take the probiotic or placebo daily for 90 days. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in breast microbiota | The diversity of the breast microbiota analysed using next-generation sequencing. | 90 days post collection period |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Testing of inflammatory markers and pollutants | Blood samples will be testing by luminex for inflammatory cytokine/chemokine markers. | 90 days post collection period |
| Testing for environmental pollutants - heavy metals. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gregor Reid, Ph.D. | London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's | Principal Investigator |
| Muriel Brackstone, M.D. | St. Joseph's Health Care London | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Joseph's Health Care | London | Ontario | N6A 4V2 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20455694 | Background | Arroyo R, Martin V, Maldonado A, Jimenez E, Fernandez L, Rodriguez JM. Treatment of infectious mastitis during lactation: antibiotics versus oral administration of Lactobacilli isolated from breast milk. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jun 15;50(12):1551-8. doi: 10.1086/652763. | |
| 24610844 | Background | Urbaniak C, Cummins J, Brackstone M, Macklaim JM, Gloor GB, Baban CK, Scott L, O'Hanlon DM, Burton JP, Francis KP, Tangney M, Reid G. Microbiota of human breast tissue. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 May;80(10):3007-14. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00242-14. Epub 2014 Mar 7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Double blind randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Dietary Supplement | Participants will take the probiotic or placebo daily for 90 days. |
|
Urine and blood will be tested for heavy metals using LC-MS.
| 90 days post collection period |
| Testing for environmental pollutants - pesticides. | Urine and blood will be tested for pesticides using LC-MS. | 90 days post collection period |
| 27342554 | Background | Urbaniak C, Gloor GB, Brackstone M, Scott L, Tangney M, Reid G. The Microbiota of Breast Tissue and Its Association with Breast Cancer. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Jul 29;82(16):5039-48. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01235-16. Print 2016 Aug 15. |
| 27485780 | Background | Hieken TJ, Chen J, Hoskin TL, Walther-Antonio M, Johnson S, Ramaker S, Xiao J, Radisky DC, Knutson KL, Kalari KR, Yao JZ, Baddour LM, Chia N, Degnim AC. The Microbiome of Aseptically Collected Human Breast Tissue in Benign and Malignant Disease. Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 3;6:30751. doi: 10.1038/srep30751. |
| 27324944 | Background | Chan AA, Bashir M, Rivas MN, Duvall K, Sieling PA, Pieber TR, Vaishampayan PA, Love SM, Lee DJ. Characterization of the microbiome of nipple aspirate fluid of breast cancer survivors. Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 21;6:28061. doi: 10.1038/srep28061. |
| 24194538 | Background | Zackular JP, Baxter NT, Iverson KD, Sadler WD, Petrosino JF, Chen GY, Schloss PD. The gut microbiome modulates colon tumorigenesis. mBio. 2013 Nov 5;4(6):e00692-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00692-13. |
| 24811328 | Background | Mira-Pascual L, Cabrera-Rubio R, Ocon S, Costales P, Parra A, Suarez A, Moris F, Rodrigo L, Mira A, Collado MC. Microbial mucosal colonic shifts associated with the development of colorectal cancer reveal the presence of different bacterial and archaeal biomarkers. J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;50(2):167-79. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-0963-x. Epub 2014 May 9. |
| 26922171 | Background | Sitas F. Twenty five years since the first prospective study by Forman et al. (1991) on Helicobacter pylori and stomach cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;41:159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 26. |
| 26282697 | Background | Macklaim JM, Clemente JC, Knight R, Gloor GB, Reid G. Changes in vaginal microbiota following antimicrobial and probiotic therapy. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015 Aug 14;26:27799. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v26.27799. eCollection 2015. |
| 25293764 | Background | Bisanz JE, Enos MK, Mwanga JR, Changalucha J, Burton JP, Gloor GB, Reid G. Randomized open-label pilot study of the influence of probiotics and the gut microbiome on toxic metal levels in Tanzanian pregnant women and school children. mBio. 2014 Oct 7;5(5):e01580-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01580-14. |
| 25127240 | Background | Bisanz JE, Seney S, McMillan A, Vongsa R, Koenig D, Wong L, Dvoracek B, Gloor GB, Sumarah M, Ford B, Herman D, Burton JP, Reid G. A systems biology approach investigating the effect of probiotics on the vaginal microbiome and host responses in a double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of post-menopausal women. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):e104511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104511. eCollection 2014. |