Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Heart surgery is a life-saving intervention for hundreds of thousands of patients each year worldwide. Advances in technology and medical expertise have improved outcomes for these patients over the years. However, despite such advances, approximately 30% of patients develop lung complications (also called "pulmonary complications") after heart surgery, which result in prolonged hospital stay, increased mortality and healthcare costs.
During and immediately after heart surgery, the patient's breathing needs to be artificially controlled by a breathing machine, called "mechanical ventilator". The medical literature has reported that in critically ill patients the use of specific settings on the breathing machine (so called "protective mechanical ventilation") prevents lung complications and significantly decreases mortality. Studies show that such settings could also be beneficial for patients that undergo several types of planned surgery, however data regarding heart surgery patients (the most vulnerable to lung complications) are lacking.The aim of our study is to test whether the use of protective mechanical ventilation settings during and after heart surgery reduces lung complications compared to the current standard of care. The main innovation of this study is the application of a novel protective mechanical ventilation strategy to patients undergoing cardiac surgery, in order to reduce post-operative pulmonary complications.
Postoperative pulmonary complications are frequent after cardiac surgery, affecting approximately 30% of all patients. Such complications result in increased morbidity, mortality and health care utilization. During and immediately after surgery, mechanical ventilation is required to control the patient's breathing. Recent scientific literature showed the striking importance of specific mechanical ventilation settings (which often constituted a bundle of interventions and were generally called "protective mechanical ventilation") in other areas of medicine (i.e., critical care, abdominal surgery, management of organ donors) to prevent the onset or propagation of lung injury as well as multiple organ dysfunction. These protective settings include tidal volume of 6 ml/kg of ideal body weight (as opposed to the traditional tidal volume of 10-12 ml/kg), use of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), recruitment maneuvers (temporary periodic application of higher respiratory pressures or volumes on the mechanical ventilator in order to re-open collapsed areas of the lungs) and attention at avoiding lung collapse during patient transfer and suctioning (i.e. maintaining PEEP during transfer and avoiding disconnection from the breathing circuit during suctioning of respiratory secretions). Such interventions could play an even more important role during cardiac surgery, where several insults to the lung take place. These insults result from the inflammatory cascade triggered by cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), myocardial injury and areas of lung collapse (atelectasis). Indeed, a recent retrospective study showed that the tidal volume utilized during and after cardiac surgery impacts significantly on organ dysfunction, with a tidal volume less than 10 ml/kg of ideal body weight providing better outcomes than larger tidal volumes.
The investigators hypothesize that our proposed bundle of protective mechanical ventilation settings aimed at minimizing lung injury by continuation of mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass, recruitment maneuvers, and use of systems that prevent lung collapse during patient transfer and suctioning (i.e. PEEP valves and closed respiratory circuits) will reduce postoperative pulmonary complications compared to the current standard of care, hence significantly improving patients outcomes and reducing health care costs.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Subjects randomized to the intervention group will receive a comprehensive perioperative mechanical ventilation strategy that includes a bundle of protective settings (use of PEEP, recruitment maneuvers and continuation of mechanical ventilation during CPB). |
|
| Control Group | No Intervention | Subjects randomized to the control group will receive mechanical ventilation according to the current usual care. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A comprehensive perioperative mechanical ventilation strategy | Other | 1) Intervention group.
Tidal volume 6ml/kg PBW PEEP 5cm H20 FiO2 to target SatO2 of 92-97% Discontinuation of mechanical ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Post-operative pulmonary complications | Daily chart review and assessment of any pulmonary complications documented | for 7 days post operatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ventilator free days | number of days without a ventilator Number of days without ventilation | Post op day 1-28 days |
| Intensive care length of stay | Number of days in the intensive care unit |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matteo Parotto, MD, PhD | Contact | 416-340-4800 | 5877 | matteo.parotto@uhn.ca |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Matteo Parotto, MD, PhD | Toronto General Hospital, UHN | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network | Recruiting | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2C4 | Canada |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Post op day 1-28 days |
| Hospital length of stay | Number of days in the hospital | Post op day 1-28 days |
| Duration of mechanical ventilation | Length of time on a ventilator | Post op day 1-28 days |
| Ease of surgical access | Ability of the surgeon to access the surgical field during cardiopulmonary bypass using a 5 point Likert scale | Intraoperatively during surgery |
| Barotrauma | defined as radiological evidence of pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum | in the first 7 days after surgery |
| Surgical complications | death, myocardial infarction, stroke, acute liver injury, and chest reopening | From the day of surgery to 48 hours post surgery |
| Acute Kidney Injury | Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury across the study population | Day of surgery to 28 days |
| Mortality | Incidence of mortality across the study population | Day of surgery to 90-day |
| Home and alive | to evaluate days at home | up to 30 days after surgery |