Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB-PG-0815-20039 | Other Grant/Funding Number | National Institute for Health Research (UK) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom | OTHER_GOV |
| University of Nottingham | OTHER |
| University of Liverpool | OTHER |
| University of Southampton |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In the UK, cochlear implantation is the standard treatment for adults with 'severe-to-profound' deafness. This level of deafness means that without a cochlear implant they have difficulty understanding what people are saying even when they wear hearing aids. The NHS provides a cochlear implant for one ear even though these adults are deaf in both ears. Two cochlear implants could help them understand speech in noisy environments, know where to look to see who is talking, and avoid hazards outdoors.
The decision about who can receive cochlear implants and how many they can receive is based on guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). NICE agreed that providing two cochlear implants can provide additional benefits over providing just one implant. However, they decided that there is not enough evidence to show that these additional benefits are worth the additional cost of providing the second implant. NICE recommended that a clinical trial should be conducted to gather this evidence.
This study will consult with patients to explore whether the trial would be acceptable to future implant recipients. The study will also work with clinicians to design a trial comparing bilateral and unilateral implantation in adults. These clinicians will also be surveyed to assess the acceptability of the trial. A group of clinicians that span the range of professions involved in delivering the care pathway will be invited to attend a trial design workshop to establish a consensus on acceptable trial design elements from a clinical perspective. Representatives from cochlear implant manufacturers will be consulted to determine possible strategies for securing industry support for a future trial. Those who run cochlear implantation services will be engaged in a working group to gather information on the current care pathway to inform future assessments of whether bilateral implantation could be cost-effective.
The study design comprises focus groups, online surveys, a trial design workshop, a manufacturer's forum, and a care pathway working group.
Focus groups Two focus groups will be conducted to explore issues around the acceptability of the two-arm trial recommended by NICE. The recruitment strategy will target both individuals who have been referred for a cochlear implant but have yet to receive one and also existing users of a cochlear implant. The focus groups will explore issues such as acceptance of randomisation, how to minimise the burden associated with participating, potential barriers to participation, and how to communicate the purpose of the trial clearly and effectively to prospective participants.
Online surveys Online surveys, informed by the focus groups, will be used to capture the views of the wider population of patients and of clinicians who deliver cochlear implant services on the acceptability of the trial. Both surveys will use open and closed questions. The surveys will explore the acceptability of the trial.
Trial design workshop Following the focus groups and surveys, an all-day workshop will be conducted with clinicians who deliver the current care pathway for cochlear implantation. The workshop will comprise a focus group and a trial design session. The focus group will seek to identify pertinent issues with the trial design from the perspective of the clinicians. The group will then be tasked with reaching a consensus on a trial design that would be both acceptable to them and which is feasible to conduct.
Manufacturer's forum Major manufacturers who supply cochlear implants to the NHS will be invited to attend a manufacturer's forum near the end of the study. They will be presented with the results of the acceptability assessment. The forum will explore whether the manufacturers would consider supporting the trial.
Care pathway working group A working group of cochlear implant service coordinators will be established to examine the existing decision analytic model commissioned by NICE and to identify the aspects of the model that require updating. The group will identify those parameters for which relevant information may be available from their own service records and will be tasked to reach a consensus on individual values for each parameter that would generally represent service provision across the providers. The group will also define plausible ranges for each parameter which could be used in future sensitivity analyses of any decision-analytic model.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus group participants | Adults who have received a cochlear implant on the National Health Service (NHS) at an auditory implant service in the United Kingdom (UK) OR Adults who have been referred to a UK auditory implant programme for assessment for cochlear implantation but who have not yet been implanted |
| |
| Online patient survey participants | Adults who have received a cochlear implant on the National Health Service (NHS) at an auditory implant service in the United Kingdom (UK) |
| |
| Online clinician survey participants | Clinicians who deliver the current care pathway for cochlear implantation at auditory implant programmes providing NHS services in the UK |
| |
| Trial design workshop participants | Clinicians who deliver the current care pathway for cochlear implantation at auditory implant programmes providing NHS services in the UK |
| |
| Manufacturer's forum participants | Representatives of manufacturers of cochlear implants who provide devices on the NHS |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No intervention | Other | No intervention will be administered to any group in this observational study. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of trial among patients | Proportion of surveyed patients who consider the proposed trial comparing bilateral cochlear implantation to unilateral cochlear implantation to be acceptable | Day 1 (Point at which the patient completes the online patient survey) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of trial among clinicians | Proportion of surveyed clinicians who consider the proposed trial to be acceptable | Day 1 (Point at which the clinician completes the online patient survey) |
| Issues related to acceptability from patient perspective |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
• None.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adults with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss that is eligible for cochlear implantation in the United Kingdom following guidance from the National institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), who have either already been implanted or who are being assessed for eligibility to be implanted.
Clinicians who deliver cochlear implantation services on the National Health Service in the UK.
Representatives of manufacturers of cochlear implant systems who supply implants to the National Health Service in the UK.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew Smyth | Contact | +44 151 795 8780 | foundation.study@liverpool.ac.uk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Padraig T Kitterick, PhD | University of Nottingham | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicines for Children Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool | Recruiting | Liverpool | L12 2AP | United Kingdom |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006312 | Hearing Loss, Bilateral |
| D006319 | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| University of East Anglia | OTHER |
| National Cochlear Implant Users Association, United Kingdom | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Care pathway working group participants | Clinicians who deliver the current care pathway for cochlear implantation at auditory implant programmes providing NHS services in the UK |
|
Major themes related to acceptability from the perspectives of patients assessed using qualitative methods |
| Day 1 (On the day(s) the patient focus groups are conducted) |
| Issues related to acceptability from clinician perspective | Major themes related to acceptability from the perspectives of clinicians assessed using qualitative methods | Day 1 (On the day the trial design workshop is conducted) |
| D012678 |
| Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |