Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Samaritan Health Services | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators wish to determine how suture spacing (5 mm vs. 10 mm) affects cosmetic outcome and development of "train tracking" in wounds. Linear wounds with sutures spaced closer together may not be as cosmetically appealing when compared to those that have larger spacing between sutures. Suturing closer together constricts blood flow and increases tension that ultimately results in more tissue necrosis and a less appealing outcome. The investigators also aim to conclude if 5 mm or 10 mm suture spacing results in less complications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 mm suture spacing | Experimental | The investigators aim to determine how suture spacing affects cosmetic outcome of wound healing. One side (1/2 of the wound length) was sutured with 10 mm suture spacing |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suture spacing for wound closure | Other | The wound was divided in half and sutures were spaced 5mm or 10mm apart depending on side. The sutures were removed at 2-week follow-up appointment and photographs were taken. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was then performed by both patient and physician. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in cosmetic outcome of 5 mm versus 10 mm suture spacing on wound healing | The wound was divided in half by placing a single 4-0 Polysorb suture in the midpoint of the wound based on ruler measurement. Simple interrupted nylon sutures were spaced approximately 5mm or 10mm apart depending on side. The sutures were then removed at 2-week follow-up appointment. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was then performed by both patient and physician. The observer scale consists of six items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area), and all items were scored on a scale from 1 ('like normal skin') to 10 ('worst scar imaginable'). The patient scale also includes six items (color, itch, pain, thickness, stiffness, and irregularity) and all items were scored on a similar scale from 1 ('like normal skin') to 10 ('worst scar imaginable'). | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in wound complications of 5 mm versus 10 mm suture spacing on wound healing | Wounds were also assessed for complications. Difficulty removing sutures was assessed by presence of either one of the following: unable to directly visualize suture knot or need to probe into wound to remove suture. Wound dehiscence was defined as at least a 1mm separation of the wound edge for at least 50% of the length of the wound closure. Edge necrosis was defined as eschar and necrosis of the wound edge for at least 50% of the wound closure. Infection was defined as any wound that had redness, pain and exudate. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Lear, MD | Contact | 503 362 8385 | wlear1@gmail.com | |
| Collin M Blattner, DO | Contact | 503 362 8385 | collin.blattner@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| William Lear, MD | Silver Falls Dermatology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silver Falls Dermatology | Recruiting | Salem | Oregon | 97302 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25431843 | Background | Dumville JC, Coulthard P, Worthington HV, Riley P, Patel N, Darcey J, Esposito M, van der Elst M, van Waes OJ. Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 28;2014(11):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub4. | |
| 21216493 | Background | Bloemen MC, van Gerven MS, van der Wal MB, Verhaegen PD, Middelkoop E. An objective device for measuring surface roughness of skin and scars. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Apr;64(4):706-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.03.006. Epub 2011 Jan 8. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 2 weeks |
| 18317050 | Background | Sagi HC, Papp S, Dipasquale T. The effect of suture pattern and tension on cutaneous blood flow as assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry in a pig model. J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Mar;22(3):171-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169074c. |
| 2143522 | Background | Braverman IM, Keh A, Goldminz D. Correlation of laser Doppler wave patterns with underlying microvascular anatomy. J Invest Dermatol. 1990 Sep;95(3):283-6. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12484917. |
| 25116976 | Result | Shin TM, Bordeaux JS. How suture technique affects the cosmetic outcome of cutaneous repairs. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Aug;13(8):967-9. |