Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-000725-12 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combined remission of complex perianal fistulas, defined as the clinical assessment at Week 24 of closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression, and absence of collections greater than (>) 2 centimeter (cm) (in at least 2 dimensions) confirmed by blinded central magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment at Week 24.
This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Cx601, eASC, for the treatment of complex perianal fistulas in participants with Crohn's disease.
The study will randomize approximately 554 participants.
Study treatments will be allocated, on a 1:1 ratio, by central randomization through interactive web response system (IWRS). The study will follow an add-on design, participants receiving any ongoing concomitant medical treatment, at stable doses at the time of screening, for the CD will be allowed to continue it throughout the study.
The primary efficacy analysis, will be conducted at Week 24 timepoint. The double blind design will be maintained up to Week 52 (both participant and investigator) by a specific blinding for study treatment administration and for evaluating its efficacy.
This multicenter trial will be conducted globally across 150 centers. The overall time to participate in this study is approximately 5 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo (saline) 24 milliliters (mL) was administered once by local injection. |
|
| Cx601 | Experimental | Cx601 expanded adipose-derived stem cells (eASCs) 120 million cells (5 million cells per mL) was administered once by local injection. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cx601 | Drug | Cx601 eASCs intralesional injection. |
| |
| Placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Combined Remission at Week 24 | Combined remission was defined as the closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression and absence of collection(s) >2 cm (in at least 2 dimensions) of the treated perianal fistula(s) confirmed by blinded central magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 24 | Clinical remission was defined as closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | Week 24 |
| Time to Clinical Remission at Week 24 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Signed informed consent.
Participants of either gender greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years and less than or equal to (<=) 75 years of age.
Participants with CD diagnosed at least 6 months prior to Screening visit in accordance with accepted clinical, endoscopic, histological and/or radiological criteria.
Presence of complex perianal fistula(s) with a maximum of 2 internal openings and a maximum of 3 external openings based on clinical assessment; a central reading of a locally performed contrast enhanced (gadolinium) pelvic MRI will be performed to confirm location of the fistula and potential associated perianal abscess(es). Fistula(s) must have been draining for at least 6 weeks prior to Screening visit. Actively draining simple subcutaneous fistula(s), at the time of Screening visit, are not allowed in this study. A complex perianal fistula is defined as a fistula that meets one or more of the following criteria :
Clinically controlled, nonactive or mildly active CD, during the last six months prior to Screening visit with:
A patient reported outcomes (PRO-2) score <14 at Screening, AND
A colonoscopy documenting the absence of ulcers larger than 0.5 cm in the colonic mucosa:
- If colonoscopy data are not available within 6 months prior to Screening:
A simple endoscopic score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) <=6 with absence of rectal ulcers larger than 0.5 cm must be documented in a colonoscopy performed at Screening before randomization.
- If colonoscopy data are available within 6 months prior to Screening, the following must be documented, otherwise a new colonoscopy (as above) will be mandatory:
The absence of ulcers larger than 0.5 cm in the colonic mucosa AND
the improvement or no worsening in abdominal pain and/or in the diarrhea, sustained for one week or more, since the last colonoscopy was performed in the clinical records until Screening visit.
AND
o No hemoglobin decrease >=2.0 gram per deciliter (g/dL) or an unexplained rising C-reactive protein (CRP), > 5.0 milligram per liter (mg/L) to a concentration above the referenced upper limit of normal (ULN) (unless the rise is due to a known process other than luminal Crohn's Disease), since the last colonoscopy was performed as compared to results during the Screening visit.
AND
o no initiation or intensification of treatment with corticosteroids, immunosuppressants or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) dose regimen since the last endoscopy up to Screening visit.
Participants whose perianal fistulas were previously treated and have shown an inadequate response or a loss of response while they were receiving either an immunosuppressive agent or tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonist or vedolizumab or ustekinumab, or having documented intolerance to any of these treatments administered at least at approved or recommended doses during the minimum period mentioned:
Women of childbearing potential (WCBP) must have negative serum pregnancy test at screening (sensitive to 25 international units [IU] human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG]). Both WCBP or male participants participating in this study, with a WCBP as partner, must agree to use an adequate method of contraception during the entire duration of the study. An adequate method of contraception is defined as complete, non-periodic sexual abstinence (refraining from heterosexual intercourse), single-barrier method, vasectomy, adequate hormonal contraception (to have started at least 7 days prior to Screening visit), or an intra-uterine device (to have been in place for at least 2 months prior to Screening visit).
Exclusion Criteria:
Concomitant rectovaginal or rectovesical fistula(s).
Participant naïve to prior specific medical treatment for complex perianal fistula(s) including immunosuppressant (IS) or anti-TNFs.
Presence of a perianal collection >2 cm in at least two dimensions on the central reading MRI at Screening visit that was not adequately drained as confirmed by the surgeon during the preparation procedure (week -3 to day 0).
Severe rectal and/or anal stenosis and/or severe proctitis (defined as the presence of large >0.5 cm ulcers in the rectum) that make impossible to follow the surgery procedure manual.
Participant with diverting stomas.
Active, uncontrolled infection requiring parenteral antibiotics.
Participant with ongoing systemic or rectal steroids for CD in the last 2 weeks prior to the Preparation visit.
Participants with major alteration on any of the following laboratory tests or increased risk for the surgical procedure:
Suspected or documented infectious enterocolitis within two weeks prior to Screening visit.
Any prior invasive malignancy diagnosed within the last 5 years prior to Screening visit. Participants with basal-cell carcinoma of the skin completely resected outside the perineal region can be included.
Current or recent (within 6 months prior to the Screening visit) history of severe, progressive, and/or uncontrolled hepatic, haematological, gastrointestinal (GI) (other than CD), renal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological or psychiatric disease that may result in participants increased risk from study participation and/or lack of compliance with study procedures.
Participants with primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Participants with known chronically active hepatopathy of any origin, including cirrhosis and participants with persistent positive Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) and quantitative HBV polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or positive serology for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and quantitative HCV PCR within 6 months prior to Screening.
Congenital or acquired immunodeficiencies, including participants known to be HIV carriers
Known allergies or hypersensitivity to penicillin or aminoglycosides; Dulbecco Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM); bovine serum; local anaesthetics or gadolinium (MRI contrast).
Contraindication to MRI scan (example, due to the presence of pacemakers, hip replacements or severe claustrophobia).
Severe trauma within 6 months prior to Screening visit.
Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Participants who do not wish to or cannot comply with study procedures.
Participants currently receiving, or having received any investigational drug within 3 months prior to Screening visit.
Participants previously treated with Cx601 or other allogeneic stem-cell therapy cannot be enrolled into this clinical study.
Any major surgery of the GI tract (including one or more segments of the colon or terminal ileum) within 6 months prior the screening or any minor surgery of the GI tract within 3 months prior to screening.
Participants who had local perianal surgery other than drainage for the fistula within 6 months prior to the Screening visit, or those who may need surgery in the perianal region for reasons other than fistulas at the time of inclusion in the study.
Contraindication to the anaesthetic procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Takeda | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scottsdale Mayo Clinic | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85259 | United States | ||
| UC San Diego Health Systems |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41790076 | Derived | Colombel JF, Garcia Olmo D, Chen ST, Serclova Z, Schwartz DA, Wexner SD, Panes J, Wu C, Zhang B, Song M, McKay C, Nazarey P, Wright E, Raffals L, Fleshner P. Darvadstrocel in Patients With Crohn's Disease With Complex Perianal Fistulas: The ADMIRE CD II Phase 3 Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2026 Jun;170(7):1562-1570. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.12.033. Epub 2026 Mar 6. |
Not provided
Not provided
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Not provided
IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
A total of 568 participants with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease were enrolled in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Cx601 or matching placebo.
Participants took part in the study at 113 investigative sites in Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom, Canada, and United States from 15 September 2017 to 26 July 2023.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Placebo (saline) 24 milliliters (mL) was administered once by local injection. |
| FG001 | Cx601 | Cx601 expanded adipose-derived stem cells (eASCs) 120 million cells (5 million cells per mL) was administered once by local injection. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Oct 28, 2019 | Jul 11, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Other |
Cx601 placebo-matching eASCs intralesional injection. |
|
Time to clinical remission was defined as the time from treatment start to first visit with closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression, as clinically assessed. |
| Week 24 |
| Percentage of Participants With Combined Remission at Week 52 | Combined remission was defined as the closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression, and absence of collections >2 cm (in at least 2 dimensions) confirmed by blinded central MRI assessment. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 52 | Clinical remission was defined as closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 24 | Clinical response was defined as closure of at least 50 percent (%) of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | Week 24 |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 52 | Clinical response was defined as closure of at least 50% of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline, despite gentle finger compression. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | Week 52 |
| Time to Clinical Remission at Week 52 | Time to clinical remission was defined as the time from treatment start to first visit with closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression, as clinically assessed. | Week 52 |
| Time to Clinical Response at Week 24 | Time to clinical response was defined as the time from treatment start to first visit with closure of at least 50% of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline, despite gentle finger compression, as clinically assessed. | Week 24 |
| Time to Clinical Response at Week 52 | Time to clinical response was defined as time from treatment start to first visit with closure of at least 50% of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression, as clinically assessed. | Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Relapse by Week 52 After Achieving Combined Remission at Week 24 | Relapse was defined as reopening of any of the treated fistulas external openings with active drainage as clinically assessed, or the development of a perianal fluid collection >2 cm of the treated perianal fistula confirmed by centrally read MRI assessment in participants who were in combined remission at week 24. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | From Week 24 to Week 52 |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (TEAESIs) | An adverse event(AE)=any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant receiving a medicinal product; it did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Serious adverse event(SAE)=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or was a congenital abnormality/birth defect, or was a medically significant event or required intervention to prevent at least one of the outcomes listed above, or was a suspected transmission of an infectious agent. AESIs included tumorigenicity, ectopic tissue formation, hypersensitivity reactions, transmission of infectious agents, immunogenicity/alloimmune reactions, and medication errors, as reported by the investigator. TEAE=AE whose onset occurred, severity worsened, or intensity increased after receiving the study treatment. | From first dose of study drug to end of follow up period (up to Week 52) |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Sign Parameters | Vital signs included measurement of pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Clinically significant vital signs assessment was based on investigator interpretation. Number of participants with clinically significant changes in vital signs were reported. | From first dose of study drug to end of follow up period (up to Week 52) |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters | Laboratory parameters included blood chemistry and hematology. Clinically significant laboratory parameters assessment was based on investigator interpretation. Number of participants with clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters (hematology and blood chemistry) were reported. | From first dose of study drug to end of follow up period (up to Week 52) |
| La Jolla |
| California |
| 92037 |
| United States |
| University of Southern California (USC) Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
| UC Irvine Medical Center - Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer | Orange | California | 92868 | United States |
| Inland Empire Liver Foundation | Rialto | California | 92377 | United States |
| Kaiser Permamente | San Francisco | California | 91115 | United States |
| University of California San Francisco | San Francisco | California | 94115 | United States |
| Vallejo Hospital and Medical Offices | Vallejo | California | 94589 | United States |
| Cedar-Sinai Medical Center | West Hollywood | California | 90048 | United States |
| University of Colorado Hospital | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
| Hartford Hospital - Gastroenterology | Farmington | Connecticut | 06032 | United States |
| Yale University School of Medicine | New Haven | Connecticut | 06519 | United States |
| MedStar Georgetown University Hospital | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20017 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic - Gastroenterology | Jacksonville | Florida | 32224 | United States |
| University of Miami Hospital | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| Florida Hospital Orlando | Orlando | Florida | 32804 | United States |
| USF Health South Tampa Center for Advanced Healthcare | Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
| Florida Hospital Tampa | Tampa | Florida | 33613 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic Florida | Weston | Florida | 33331 | United States |
| Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Rush University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
| The University of Chicago Medicine - Colon & Rectal Surgery | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| Carle Foundation Hospital | Urbana | Illinois | 61801 | United States |
| Indiana University - Colon and Rectal | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46237 | United States |
| University of Kansas Sxchool of Medicine | Kansas City | Kansas | 66160 | United States |
| University of Louisville | Louisville | Kentucky | 40292 | United States |
| Digestive Health Center of Louisiana | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | 70809 | United States |
| Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates | Metairie | Louisiana | 70001 | United States |
| University Medical Center - New Orleans | New Orleans | Louisiana | 71103 | United States |
| University of Maryland | Baltimore | Maryland | 21201 | United States |
| Johns Hopkins Medicine - The Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| Massachussetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Boston Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 08807 | United States |
| Lahey Hospital & Medical Center | Burlington | Massachusetts | 01803 | United States |
| University of Massachusetts - colon & rectal surgery | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01605 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic College of Medicine - Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery - Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Gastroenterology | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| University of Nevada School of Medicine | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89154 | United States |
| Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center - Cancer Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire | 03756 | United States |
| Morristown Medical Center - Gastroenterology | Morristown | New Jersey | 07960 | United States |
| Albany Medical Center | Albany | New York | 12208 | United States |
| North Shore University Hospital - Gastroenterology | Manhasset | New York | 11030 | United States |
| NYU Langone Medical Center | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| Stony Brook University Medical Center | New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| Weill Medical College of Cornell University | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York | New York | 10028 | United States |
| Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| Lenox Hill Hospital | New York | New York | 10075 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| OHSU Digestive Health Center | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| Harvard Medical School-Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| Penn State Hershey Medical Center - Surgery | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| Thomas Jefferson University Hospital | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| Allegheny General Hospital | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15212 | United States |
| University Surgical Associates-Rhode Island Hospital | Providence | Rhode Island | 02904 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Rapid City Medical Center | Rapid City | South Dakota | 57701 | United States |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37232 | United States |
| UT Southwestern Medical Center - Gastroenterology - Gastroenterology | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) - Gastroenterology | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| University of Utah | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84112 | United States |
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
| Carilion Clinic | Roanoke | Virginia | 24016 | United States |
| Virginia Mason Medical Center - Gastroenterology | Seattle | Washington | 98101 | United States |
| Swedish Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98104 | United States |
| Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53215 | United States |
| Medical College of Wisconsin Hub for Collaborative Medicine - Gastroenterology and Hepatology | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| UZ Leuven - Campus Gasthuisberg | Leuven | Vlaams Brabant | 3000 | Belgium |
| AZ Groeninge - Campus Kennedylaan - Gastro-enterology | Kortrijk | West-Vlaanderen | 8500 | Belgium |
| AZ Delta vzw - Maag-darm-leverziekten | Roeselare | West-Vlaanderen | 8800 | Belgium |
| GZA ziekenhuizen - Campus Sint-Vincentius - Gastro-enterology | Antwerp | 2018 | Belgium |
| Imelda Ziekenhuis | Antwerp | 2820 | Belgium |
| UZ Gent - Gastroenterology | Ghent | 9000 | Belgium |
| CHU de Liege - Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman | Liège | 4000 | Belgium |
| Clinique Saint-Joseph (CHC) | Liège | 4000 | Belgium |
| CHU Dinant Godinne UCL Namur | Namur | 5530 | Belgium |
| University of Alberta | Edmonton | Alberta | T6G 2X8 | Canada |
| (G.I.R.I.) GI Research Institute | Vancouver | British Columbia | V6Z 2K5 | Canada |
| Ottawa Hospital | Ottawa | Ontario | K1H 8L6 | Canada |
| Mount Sinai Hospital - Toronto - Gastroenterology | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 1X5 | Canada |
| Kensington Screening Clinic - Gastroenterology | Toronto | Ontario | M5T 3A9 | Canada |
| Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal | Montreal | Quebec | H2X 3J4 | Canada |
| McGill University Health Centre - Montreal General Hospital | Montreal | Quebec | H3G 1A4 | Canada |
| NH Hospital a.s. | Hořovice | Beroun | 268 31 | Czechia |
| FN Hradec Kralove | Hradec Králové | 500 05 | Czechia |
| Bispebjerg Hospital | Copenhagen | Copenhague | 2400 | Denmark |
| Aarhus University Hospital - Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Lever-Mave- og Tarmsygdomme Klinik, krydspunkt C216 | Aarhus | 8200 | Denmark |
| Odense Universitetshospital | Odense | Denmark |
| CHU de Nice | Nice | Alpes-Maritimes | 06202 | France |
| CHU de Clermont-Ferrand - Estaing | Clermont-Ferrand | Auvergne | 63003 | France |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Toulouse - Hopital De Ra | Toulouse | Haute-Garonne | 31059 | France |
| CHRU Hopital De Pontchaillou | Rennes | Ille-et-Vilaine | 35033 | France |
| CHRU de Nancy -Hopital Brabois Adultes - Service d'Hepato- Gastroenterologie | Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy | Lorraine | 54511 | France |
| CHRU De Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez - Hepato-Gastro-Enterologie | Lille | Nord | 59000 | France |
| CHU Saint Etienne | Saint Priest En Jarez | Pays de la Loire Region | 42270 | France |
| CHU Amiens-Picardie | Amiens | Picardie | 80054 | France |
| Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud | Pierre-Bénite | Rhone | 69495 | France |
| Paris St. Joseph Hospital | Paris | 75014 | France |
| Hopital Beaujon | Clichy | Île-de-France Region | 92110 | France |
| Hopital Saint Louis - Gastro-hepatoenterologie | Paris | Île-de-France Region | 75010 | France |
| Universitatsklinikum Erlangen | Erlangen | Bavaria | 91054 | Germany |
| Klinikum der Universitat Munchen - Campus Grosshadern | München | Bavaria | 81377 | Germany |
| Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat | Frankfurt am Main | Hesse | 69590 | Germany |
| Universitatsklinikum Dresden | Dresden | Saxony | 01307 | Germany |
| Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont - I. sz. Belgyogyaszati Klinika | Szeged | Csongrád megye | 6720 | Hungary |
| Debreceni Egyetem Klinikai Kozpont | Debrecen | Hajdú-Bihar | H-4032 | Hungary |
| MH Egeszsegugyi Kozpont - Gasztroenterologiai Osztaly | Budapest | Pest County | 1062 | Hungary |
| Semmelweis Egyetem | Budapest | Pest County | H-1088 | Hungary |
| Rabin Med Ctr Beilinson Hosp | Petah Tikva | Central District | 4941492 | Israel |
| Shaare Zedek Medical Center - Gastroenterology | Jerusalem | Jerusalem | 9103102 | Israel |
| Hadassah Medical Organization, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein- | Jerusalem | Jerusalem | 91120 | Israel |
| Rambam Medical Centre | Haifa | Northern District | 31096 | Israel |
| Chaim sheba Medical Center | Tel Litwinsky | Tel Aviv | 5262000 | Israel |
| Ospedale Santissima Annunziata | Cento | Ferrara | 44042 | Italy |
| Istituto Clinico Humanitas Rozzano, IRCCS - IBD Center | Rozzano | Milano | 20089 | Italy |
| Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, AOU di Bologna-U.O. di Medicina Interna. | Bologna | 40138 | Italy |
| AOU Policlinico di Modena - Gastroenterologia | Modena | 41124 | Italy |
| II Universita degli Studi di Napoli | Naples | 80131 | Italy |
| Gastroenterology Section | Palermo | 90127 | Italy |
| Universita degli studi di Pisa | Pisa | 56126 | Italy |
| Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico - UOC di Gastroenterologia | Roma | 00128 | Italy |
| A.O. San Camillo Forlanini | Roma | 00152 | Italy |
| Complesso Integrato Columbus | Roma | 00168 | Italy |
| Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli | Roma | 00168 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S.Maria della Misericordia - Gastroenterologia | Udine | 33100 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (AOUI) - | Verona | 37134 | Italy |
| Centrum Medyczne PROMED | Krakow | Lesser Poland Voivodeship | 31-411 | Poland |
| Centrum Medyczne Melita Medical | Wroclaw | Lower Silesian Voivodeship | 50-449 | Poland |
| Wielospecjalistyczny Szpital Medicover | Warsaw | Masovian Voivodeship | 03-984 | Poland |
| Endoskopia Sp z o.o. | Sopot | Pomeranian Voivodeship | 81-756 | Poland |
| COPERNICUS Podmiot Leczniczy Sp. z o.o. | Gdansk | 80-803 | Poland |
| Centralny Szpital Kliniczny MSWiA w Warszawie | Warsaw | 02-507 | Poland |
| Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny im. Wojskowej Akademii Medycznej Centralny Szpital Weteranow | Lodz | Łódź Voivodeship | 90-647 | Poland |
| University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine | San Juan | 00936 | Puerto Rico |
| Hospital Universitario Son Espases | Palma de Mallorca | Balearic Islands | 07120 | Spain |
| H.U. G.Trias i Pujol | Badalona | Barcelona | 08916 | Spain |
| Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli | Sabadell | Barcelona | 8208 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada | Fuenlabrada | Madrid | 28942 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda | Majadahonda | Madrid | 28222 | Spain |
| Hospital de Sagunto | Sagunto | Valencia | 46520 | Spain |
| Hospital Clinic de Barcelona | Barcelona | 08036 | Spain |
| Hospital del Mar | Barcelona | 8003 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal | Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
| Hospital Clinico San Carlos | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre | Madrid | 28041 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario La Paz | Madrid | 28046 | Spain |
| C.H.U. de Pontevedra | Pontevedra | 36071 | Spain |
| H.U.V. del Rocio | Seville | 21005 | Spain |
| Linkoping University Hospital - Department of Surgery | Linköping | Ostergotlands Lan [se-05] | 581 85 | Sweden |
| Addenbrooke's Hospital | Cambridge | Cambridgeshire | CB2 0QQ | United Kingdom |
| NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde - Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GRI) | Glasgow | Glasgow City | G52 3NQ | United Kingdom |
| St. Mark's Hospital | Harrow | London, City of | HA1 3UJ | United Kingdom |
| Guys & St Thomas | London | London, City of | SE1 7EH | United Kingdom |
| Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust - Surgery | Nottingham | Nottinghamshire | NG7 2UH | United Kingdom |
| University Colleague London Hospital (UCLH) | London | NW1 2BU | United Kingdom |
| Wythenshawe Hospital - Gastroenterology | Manchester | M13 9WL | United Kingdom |
| Northern General Hospital | Sheffield | S10 2JF | United Kingdom |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The Intent-to-treat (ITT) Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Placebo (saline) 24 mL was administered once by local injection. |
| BG001 | Cx601 | Cx601 eASCs 120 million cells (5 million cells/mL) was administered once by local injection. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Height | Number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for height at the Baseline. | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeters (cm) |
| ||||||||||||||
| Weight | Number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for weight at the Baseline. | Mean | Standard Deviation | kilograms (kg) |
| ||||||||||||||
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for BMI at the Baseline. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Combined Remission at Week 24 | Combined remission was defined as the closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression and absence of collection(s) >2 cm (in at least 2 dimensions) of the treated perianal fistula(s) confirmed by blinded central magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 24 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 24 | Clinical remission was defined as closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Clinical Remission at Week 24 | Time to clinical remission was defined as the time from treatment start to first visit with closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression, as clinically assessed. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants who had clinical remission at Week 24. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | weeks | Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Combined Remission at Week 52 | Combined remission was defined as the closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression, and absence of collections >2 cm (in at least 2 dimensions) confirmed by blinded central MRI assessment. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 52 | Clinical remission was defined as closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 24 | Clinical response was defined as closure of at least 50 percent (%) of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 52 | Clinical response was defined as closure of at least 50% of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline, despite gentle finger compression. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Clinical Remission at Week 52 | Time to clinical remission was defined as the time from treatment start to first visit with closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression, as clinically assessed. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with clinical remission at Week 52. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | weeks | Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Clinical Response at Week 24 | Time to clinical response was defined as the time from treatment start to first visit with closure of at least 50% of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline, despite gentle finger compression, as clinically assessed. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with clinical response at Week 24. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | weeks | Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Clinical Response at Week 52 | Time to clinical response was defined as time from treatment start to first visit with closure of at least 50% of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression, as clinically assessed. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with clinical response at Week 52. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | weeks | Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Relapse by Week 52 After Achieving Combined Remission at Week 24 | Relapse was defined as reopening of any of the treated fistulas external openings with active drainage as clinically assessed, or the development of a perianal fluid collection >2 cm of the treated perianal fistula confirmed by centrally read MRI assessment in participants who were in combined remission at week 24. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. | The ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants who were responders (achieved combined remission) at Week 24. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From Week 24 to Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), and Treatment-emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (TEAESIs) | An adverse event(AE)=any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant receiving a medicinal product; it did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Serious adverse event(SAE)=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or was a congenital abnormality/birth defect, or was a medically significant event or required intervention to prevent at least one of the outcomes listed above, or was a suspected transmission of an infectious agent. AESIs included tumorigenicity, ectopic tissue formation, hypersensitivity reactions, transmission of infectious agents, immunogenicity/alloimmune reactions, and medication errors, as reported by the investigator. TEAE=AE whose onset occurred, severity worsened, or intensity increased after receiving the study treatment. | The Safety (SAF) Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received the actual study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From first dose of study drug to end of follow up period (up to Week 52) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Sign Parameters | Vital signs included measurement of pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Clinically significant vital signs assessment was based on investigator interpretation. Number of participants with clinically significant changes in vital signs were reported. | SAF Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received the actual study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From first dose of study drug to end of follow up period (up to Week 52) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters | Laboratory parameters included blood chemistry and hematology. Clinically significant laboratory parameters assessment was based on investigator interpretation. Number of participants with clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters (hematology and blood chemistry) were reported. | SAF Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received the actual study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From first dose of study drug to end of follow up period (up to Week 52) |
|
|
From first dose of study drug to end of follow up period (up to Week 52)
All-cause Mortality: ITT Analysis Set included all randomized participants regardless of their being treated or not and regardless of their having any postbaseline efficacy measurements or not. Serious and Other Adverse Events: SAF Analysis Set included all randomized participants who received the actual study treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Placebo (saline) 24 mL was administered once by local injection. | 0 | 285 | 35 | 274 | 67 | 274 |
| EG001 | Cx601 | Cx601 eASCs 120 million cells (5 million cells/mL) was administered once by local injection. | 1 | 283 | 41 | 278 | 66 | 278 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess limb | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal fistula | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anal inflammation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaphylactic shock | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anorectal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anorectal disorder | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| B-cell lymphoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiomyopathy | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fallopian tube cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment | Number of participants at risk in each arm is based on the female population in this study. |
|
| Female genital tract fistula | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment | Number of participants at risk in each arm is based on the female population in this study. |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Histoplasmosis disseminated | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inguinal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestine perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malnutrition | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Obstruction gastric | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ovarian cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment | Number of participants at risk in each arm is based on the female population in this study. |
|
| Perirectal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peritonitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural hypotension | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proctalgia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tibia fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ureterolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proctalgia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 26 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi-site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Takeda | +1-877-825-3327 | TrialDisclosures@takeda.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 21, 2023 | Jul 11, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003424 | Crohn Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cx601 eASCs 120 million cells (5 million cells/mL) was administered once by local injection. |
|
|
|
|