Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Teleflex | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study was designed to evaluate the success rate, time of insertion, sealing efficacy and security of the Protector Laryngeal Mask, a new second generation disposable supraglottic airway device, in patients undergoing elective surgery.
Laryngeal masks (LM) and supraglottic devices (SGD), in all their different forms, have become an authentic innovation in airway management especially in day surgery.
LMA Protector (Teleflex Medical, Athlone, Ireland) is a new disposable SGD currently available for anaesthetic practice. It is made of silicone (with no latex in its composition) and shares some of the characteristics of the second generation SGDs (as the presence of a gastric access channel); however, it has an additional drainage channel, both channels terminate distally in a camera behind the mask cuff. The presence of two drainage channels ("male" and "female") increases the patient safety against regurgitation, both of distal gastric content and secretions located in the oropharyngeal region. The gastric access channel called "female" also allows the insertion of a nasogastric tube if required. These drainage channels are useful for diagnosing the correct position of the mask, since the observation of leaks or gas through it can help diagnose a displacement the mask.
LMA Protector is designed with a preformed anatomic curve, and the airway conduct has an elliptical cross section, which ends distally in the mask. This design follows the anatomy of the human airway, which facilitates the insertion of the device. The softness of the mask material allows easy insertion.
Doubts regarding the transmission of infectious diseases with reusable devices makes disposable devices such as LMA Protector, one of the most interesting devices for use in anaesthetic procedures that are usually performed with SGD.
Its characteristics in the design, composition by a smooth and atraumatic material, the presence of two gastric drainage accesses, with potential improved patient safety and its characteristic of being disposable suggests a significant expansion of its use in the coming years .
In contrast to other SGDs that have been evaluated extensively, to date there are no large clinical studies showing its suitably and performance in a daily clinical scenario.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protector Laryngeal Mask Airway | Patients undergoing anesthesia in which airway management includes a Protector Laryngeal Mask and fulfill the inclusion criteria of the study. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protector Laryngeal Mask airway | Device | Evaluate the time of insertion, performance, security and insertion success rate of the Protector Laryngeal Mask in patients under general anasthesia. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate the number of attempts to insert of the LMA Protector | Insertion attempts: from picking up the LMA Protector until the mask is placed into the patient mouth . (in numbers) | The number of insertion attempts will be collected after anesthesia induction: 1 minute after the administration of propofol |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Blood pressure during insertion of LMA protect | Blood pressure in mmHg | Baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the LMA protector |
| Heart rate during insertion of LMA protect |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients undergoing surgery procedures in any of the collaborating centers of the study that fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria described below.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Maite López-Gil | Servicio de Anestesiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Servicio de Anestesia, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon | Madrid | 28007 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Brimacombe JR, editor. Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia. Principles and practice. 2nd Ed. Filadelfia. 2005. | ||
| 27147543 | Background | Van Zundert AA, Skinner MW, Van Zundert TC, Luney SR, Pandit JJ. Value of knowing physical characteristics of the airway device before using it. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;117(1):12-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew106. Epub 2016 May 4. No abstract available. | |
| Background | Zaballos García M, López Álvarez S, Agustí Martínez-Marcos S, Blanco Sánchez T, Bustos Molina F, Cabré Fabré P, et al. Nuevas aportaciones de la mascarilla laríngea en cirugía ambulatoria. Contribución de la mascarilla laríngea Supreme. Cir May Amb 2011; 16(2): 60-6. | ||
| Background | Zaballos García M, López Álvarez S, Agustí Martínez-Marcos S, Blanco Sánchez T, Bustos Molina F, Cabré Fabré P, Cordero Lorenzo JM, Izquierdo Villaroya B, Lafuente Ojeda N, M. López Gil M, Rodríguez Archilla A, Zaballos Bustingorri J Recomendaciones prácticas de uso de la mascarilla laríngea en Cirugía Ambulatoria. Cir May Amb 2008; 13: (1) 4-26. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
heart rate in beep per minute
| Baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the LMA protector |
| BIS data | number from 100 (awake) to 40-45 (anesthetic status) | Baseline and every 3 minutes until 6 minutes after insertion of the LMA protector (To evaluate the evolution of BIS values during insertion of the LMA |
| Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector | The Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector will be determined with an intracuff pressure of 60 cm H2O by closing the expiratory valve of the breathing circle circuit at a fixed gas flow of 3 L/min and noting the pressure at which an oropharyngeal leak occurs. (in cm H2O) | The Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector will be collected 5 minutes after the LMA Protector will be inserted |