Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
It is assumed that the reduction of the flap dimension could provide a reduction of surgical time, post surgical complications and patient's discomfort when compared with the traditional surgical approach.
16 edentulous patients in maxillary posterior area were treated with a bilateral sinus lift procedure. Once enrolled in the study impressions were realised and the radiographic stent prepared, with radio-opaque references fixed in the positions where the implants should be inserted. Pre-surgical CT scan was executed after placing the stent in its proper position in patient's mouth. If no surgical contra-indications were detected at CT evaluation, patients were involved in the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| test side ( horizontal flap) | Horizontal incision was realised in alveolar mucosa, in order to obtain the exposure of the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus, thus accessing the sinus cavity |
| |
| control side ( standard flap) | Trapezoidal flap was realised, using a crestal incision and two deep vertical incisions extended in the fornix to expose the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| flap | Procedure | after flap incision , the sinus cavity was opened and then the membrane raised up |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| height of augmented bone obtained | the height of the gained bone was recorded by using the control CT scan, realized after 6 months of follow up | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of the surgery | both total and partial times of different surgical steps were recorded | 1 day |
| Post surgical patient's discomfort | all patients were asked to fill out a VAS scale, graduated from 1 (minimal pain ) to 10 ( maximum pain) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
all the involved patients were edentulous in the maxillary posterior area , bilaterally, with a residual bone heigh of less then 4 mm; for this reason they required a surgical bone reconstruction for implant placement.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| marco ferrari, clinical director | tuscan school of dental medicine, university of Firenze and Siena | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Siena University, Department of Periodontology, Policlinico Le Scotte Siena. | Siena | 53100 | Italy | |||
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013524 | Surgical Flaps |
| D059546 | Sinus Floor Augmentation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019738 | Surgically-Created Structures |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
| D019647 | Oral Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 2 weeks |
| Tuscan School of Dentistry |
| Siena |
| 53100 |
| Italy |
| D016025 | Bone Transplantation |
| D019637 | Orthopedic Procedures |
| D003813 | Dentistry |