Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multi-site, prospective, open-label, randomized, 2 period cross over study comparing the subjects' current 32G pen needle (four groups of pen needles) to the BD Nucleus pen needle. The study will consist of two 15 day periods ( in which the subject will use each pen needle [BD Nucleus pen needle or subject's current pen needle, order randomized] for injection. At the end of the last study period, each subject will be asked to evaluate his or her perceptions using a 150mm relative VAS scale.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental |
| |
| Group 2 | Experimental |
| |
| Group 3 | Experimental |
| |
| Group 4 | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BD Nanoâ„¢ vs Nucleus | Device | Subjects will be randomized to
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall User Preference -Combined Groups | This is a combined endpoint for all study subjects. User preference is assessed through a single question reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle). | 30 Days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall User Preference - Each Comparator Group | This endpoint analyzes data for individual groups. User preference is assessed through a single question reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults (18 - 75 inclusive)
Diagnosed Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes
Every effort will be made to recruit approximately 25% Type 1 patients (of the total population, not of each subgroup) (minimum: 10%, maximum: 50%)
Every effort will be made to recruit a minimum of 30 subjects with Asian ethnicity (of the total population, not of each subgroup). Ideally, 60 Asian subjects are needed for the study
Minimum within the last 4 months experience self-injecting insulin with a pen injector
Minimum within the last 2 months experience self-injecting consistently with one of the following available pen needles OR a subject may be enrolled that is using a 31G/32G pen needle that is not longer than 6mm in length who is willing to transfer to one of the following 32G pen needle with a 14 day wash-in period:
Able and willing to provide informed consent/participant form
Able and willing to complete all study procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East West Medical Research Institute | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96814 | United States | ||
| PMG Research of Raleigh |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Whooley S, Briskin T, Gibney M, Blank L, Berube J, Pflug B. Evaluation the User Performance and Experience of a New Pen Needle with Advanced Hub Face Geometry. Poster presented at: American Association of Diabetes Education Annual Conference; 2018 Aug 17-20; Baltimore, MD. | ||
| 30809762 | Derived | Whooley S, Briskin T, Gibney MA, Blank LR, Berube J, Pflug BK. Evaluating the User Performance and Experience with a Re-Engineered 4 mm x 32G Pen Needle: A Randomized Trial with Similar Length/Gauge Needles. Diabetes Ther. 2019 Apr;10(2):697-712. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0585-7. Epub 2019 Feb 27. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Group 1 | BD Nanoâ„¢ vs Nucleus: Subjects will be randomized to
|
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 20, 2017 | Feb 28, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| NovoFine® vs Nucleus | Device | Subjects will be randomized to
|
|
| NovoTwist®/NovoFine® Plus vs Nucleus | Device | Subjects will be randomized to
|
|
| Other Commercially Available Pen Needles (Unifine® Pentips®/Mylife Clickfine®) vs Nucleus | Device | Subjects will be randomized to
|
|
| 30 Days |
| User Experience - All Study Groups Combined | This is a combined endpoint for all study subjects. User experience is assessed through a series of questions reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle). Questions include the subject's perception of: Overall Comfort, Anxiety Associated with a Needle Stick Injury, Injection Pain, and Ease of Use. | 30 Days |
| User Experience - Each Individual Study Group | This endpoint analyzes data for individual groups. User experience is assessed through a series of questions reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle). Questions include the subject's perception of: Overall Comfort, Anxiety Associated with a Needle Stick Injury, Injection Pain, and Ease of Use. | 30 Days |
| Raleigh |
| North Carolina |
| 27609 |
| United States |
| Rapid Medical Research, Inc. | Cleveland | Ohio | 44122 | United States |
| Corporation Lane Internal Medicine and Research Center | Virginia Beach | Virginia | 23462 | United States |
| Group 2 |
NovoFine® vs Nucleus: Subjects will be randomized to
|
| FG002 | Group 3 | NovoTwist®/NovoFine® Plus vs Nucleus: Subjects will be randomized to
|
| FG003 | Group 4 | Other Commercially Available Pen Needles (MHC Easy Touch, Simple Diagnostics Comfor EZ) vs Nucleus: Subjects will be randomized to
|
| Sequence A(Nucleus) |
|
| Sequence B(Comparator) |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Group 1 | BD Nanoâ„¢ vs Nucleus: Subjects will be randomized to
|
| BG001 | Group 2 | NovoFine® vs Nucleus: Subjects will be randomized to
|
| BG002 | Group 3 | NovoTwist®/NovoFine® Plus vs Nucleus: Subjects will be randomized to
|
| BG003 | Group 4 | Other Commercially Available Pen Needles (Unifine® Pentips®/Mylife Clickfine®) vs Nucleus: Subjects will be randomized to
|
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall User Preference -Combined Groups | This is a combined endpoint for all study subjects. User preference is assessed through a single question reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle). | Per-protocol population; note that one VAS data point was missing. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mm | 30 Days |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall User Preference - Each Comparator Group | This endpoint analyzes data for individual groups. User preference is assessed through a single question reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle). | Per-protocol population; note that one VAS data point was missing | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mm | 30 Days |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | User Experience - All Study Groups Combined | This is a combined endpoint for all study subjects. User experience is assessed through a series of questions reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle). Questions include the subject's perception of: Overall Comfort, Anxiety Associated with a Needle Stick Injury, Injection Pain, and Ease of Use. | Per-protocol population | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mm | 30 Days |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | User Experience - Each Individual Study Group | This endpoint analyzes data for individual groups. User experience is assessed through a series of questions reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the Nucleus Pen labeled at +75 mm and the subject's current pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference for BD Nucleus and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator (current pen needle). Questions include the subject's perception of: Overall Comfort, Anxiety Associated with a Needle Stick Injury, Injection Pain, and Ease of Use. | Per-protocol population | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mm | 30 Days |
|
Adverse Events were collected over 6 week period.
Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events did not differ from clinicaltrials.gov definitions
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Nucleus | This arm contains every subject in the study. Because every subject regardless of group recieved Nucleus | 0 | 241 | 1 | 241 | 50 | 241 |
| EG001 | BD Nano | This arm contains only those subjects that recieve BD Nano, included in results section described in group 1. | 0 | 65 | 0 | 65 | 5 | 65 |
| EG002 | NovoFine® | This arm contains only those subjects that recieved NovoFine®, included in results section described in group 2. | 0 | 49 | 1 | 49 | 4 | 49 |
| EG003 | NovoTwist®/NovoFine® | This arm contains only those subjects that recieved NovoTwist®/NovoFine®, included in results section described in group 3. | 0 | 66 | 0 | 66 | 4 | 66 |
| EG004 | Other Commercially Available Pen Needles (Unifine® Pentips®/M | This arm contains only those subjects that recieved Other Commercial Pen Needles, included in results section described in group 4. | 0 | 61 | 1 | 61 | 5 | 61 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broken Right Ankle | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment | Subject broke their ankle |
| |
| Infection of L Hand Laceration | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Influenza | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bleeding | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment | Experience exceeds that normally associated with the procedure, as judged by the Subject |
| |
| Bruising | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment | Experience exceeds that normally associated with the procedure, as judged by the Subject |
| |
| Swelling/Pain at injection site | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment | Experience exceeds that normally associated with the procedure, as judged by the Subject |
| |
| Hypoglycemia | Endocrine disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abcess under chin | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Common Cold | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| L hand Laceration | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory Illness | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Stomach Ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Worsening of Type 2 Diabetes | Endocrine disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Gibney | Becton Dickinson | 201-847-6170 | michael_gibney@bd.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 22, 2018 | Feb 28, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|