How Often Can Optimal Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Results be Achieved? - a Randomised Controlled Trial of FFR Targeted PCI (the Target FFR Study)
How Often Can Optimal Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Results be Achieved? - a Randomised Controlled Trial of FFR Targeted PCI (the Target FFR Study)
There has recently been renewed interest in the measurement of post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR). Previous studies have suggested that post-PCI FFR values ≥0.90 are associated with better clinical outcomes for patients but the available data suggest that despite angiographically satisfactory results, this is actually achieved in less than 40% of cases.
The main mechanisms for sub-optimal post-PCI FFR measurements have been proposed to be suboptimal stent deployment, unmasking of a second lesion in the target vessel post PCI, residual diffuse disease in the untreated segments and pressure drift (a technical artefact of pressure wire technology).
Using post-PCI FFR to guide stent optimisation and/or further intervention in the target vessel has been shown to increase the frequency of achieving optimal post-PCI FFR results (and therefore presumably better clinical outcomes). However, there are additional costs involved in the routine use of post-PCI FFR and it is not clear just how often it is even possible to increase the initial post-PCI FFR to ≥0.90. This uncertainty means that it is currently difficult to either recommend the routine use of post-PCI FFR or justify its cost.
The investigators propose a prospective study to assess the feasibility of achieving post-PCI FFR ≥0.90 during standard PCI procedures in consecutive patients. The study would also attempt to elucidate the mechanisms for sub-optimal FFR results when they occur. The investigators anticipate using the data from this developmental study to support a subsequent funding application for a definitive phase 3 study of the impact of FFR targeted PCI on clinical outcomes.
Original hypothesis
A simple Physiology-guided Incremental Optimisation Strategy (PIOS) can increase the proportion of patients undergoing PCI in whom a post-PCI FFR ≥0.90 can be achieved from 40% to 60%.
Experimental details and design of proposed investigation
Overall aim:
A randomised controlled trial of a physiology-guided optimisation strategy to determine the feasibility of increasing the proportion of post-PCI FFR measurements ≥0.90 in a consecutive series of patients undergoing standard PCI procedures.
Study Population:
260 consecutive patients with stable angina referred for invasive management to the cardiac catheterisation lab who have been selected to undergo PCI based on either angiographic appearances or prior FFR assessment. Patients will be caffeine free for >12 hours pre-procedure.
Methods/Design:
Informed consent will be obtained prior to cardiac catheterisation in all potential subjects conforming to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Patients will then be randomised to one of two groups (described below) and PCI will be performed, using a pressure guidewire, according to standard practice at the Golden Jubilee National Hospital (including lesion pre-dilation and post-dilation of the stented segment).
Group 1 (PIOS Group):
Operator-blinded coronary physiology measurements will be recorded pre and post PCI.
If the post-PCI FFR is ≥0.90, no further intervention will be performed and the procedure is considered complete.
If post-PCI FFR is <0.90, the result will be disclosed to the operator and a hyperaemic pressure wire pullback during a standard peripheral intravenous adenosine infusion (140mcg/kg/min) will be performed. Depending on the result the operator would then have the following options:
A. If there is a step-up of ≥0.05 across the stented segment(s) further post-dilatation with a 0.25 - 0.50mm larger non-compliant balloon to at least 18 atmospheres should be performed followed by repeat FFR. Alternatively, the operator may choose to employ intracoronary imaging (IVUS or OCT) to guide post-dilation/optimisation of the stented segment.
B. If there is a step-up of ≥0.05 across a relatively focal (<20mm) unstented segment which is technically suitable for further stenting then a further stent should be implanted followed by repeat FFR.
C. If the FFR remains <0.90 after steps A +/- B, a further FFR pullback will be performed. If the criteria for Step B are again met, one additional stent may be deployed and a final FFR pullback performed. Following this, the FFR result will be accepted.
D. If the residual pressure gradient is interpreted to reflect diffuse atherosclerosis with no focal step-ups, the result is accepted.
E. At the end of the procedure the pressure wire sensor will be withdrawn to the tip of the guiding catheter and compared with the aortic pressure. A pressure drift of ≤0.03 will be accepted and the final FFR result adjusted accordingly.
F. If there is a drift of ≥0.04, the wire should be re-equalised and the final FFR measurement be repeated.
G. The patients will have their demographics and procedure details recorded. All patients will be asked to complete follow-up questionnaires at 3 months.
Group 2 (Control Group):
Pre and post-PCI coronary physiology measurements will be recorded but not disclosed to the operator. The angiographically defined result will be accepted. The patients will have their demographics and procedure details recorded. All patients will be asked to complete follow-up questionnaires at 3 months.
Expected value of results
Confirmation that the proposed PIOS protocol significantly increases the proportion of patients obtaining a physiologically optimal post-PCI result will demonstrate the feasibility of this strategy and should lead to an increase in post-PCI pressure wire usage to achieve physiologically optimal results for patients.
The investigators hypothesise that the PIOS intervention can increase the proportion of patients achieving this target from 40% to 60% and believe that an increment of at least this magnitude would be necessary to make a future larger study with both patient-oriented clinical (target vessel failure) and health care system (resource utilisation) outcomes acceptable to the interventional cardiology community and potential funders.
The secondary outcome measures, albeit underpowered for clinical outcomes in this study, will hopefully still give a signal that achieving a target post-PCI FFR ≥0.90 does yield objective benefits for patients. This could then form the basis for a larger phase 3 trial to confirm improved clinical outcomes and cost- effectiveness of FFR-targeted PCI
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: