Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Florida | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Despite its limitations, fetal heart rate (FHR) tracing analysis is the best monitor of fetal well-being during labor or preparation for cesarean delivery. Current monitoring methods: transabdominal ultrasound (CTG: cardiotocograph) and fetal scalp electrodes (FSE) have limitations (tracing loss during fetal movement, potential to confuse maternal for fetal heart rate, inability to monitor during cesarean section or abdominal surgery) and, in the latter case, risks (infection, hematoma). A reliable, non-invasive monitor of the fetal heart rate that can be used during labor, non-obstetric and obstetric surgery during pregnancy is needed. Recent developments in use of maternal abdominal electrodes for extraction of the FHR and contraction information inform this study.
LaborView®, developed by researchers at University of Florida (UF) College of Medicine and OBMedical, is an FDA-approved non-invasive labor monitoring device. Refinement of the extraction algorithms continues, and that work is most effectively performed at UF, where the primary researchers and OBMedical are located.
LaborView monitoring will be recorded from up to150 subjects admitted to Labor and Delivery at UFHealth. Data will be simultaneously obtained from the standard labor monitor. These signals will then be analyzed off-line for comparison and refinement of algorithms.
Despite its limitations, fetal heart rate (FHR) tracing analysis is the best monitor of fetal well being during labor. Typically, continuous electronic fetal monitoring is via transabdominal ultrasound (CTG: cardiotocograph). A transducer is strapped to the maternal abdomen and positioned in such a way to detect fetal rather than maternal heart rate. There are occasional periods of signal loss as the patient or her fetus moves, as well as times when the monitor incorrectly records the maternal signal. Maternal obesity presents particular challenges to non-invasive monitoring.
When there is particular concern regarding the fetal heart rate tracing the obstetrician may opt for a fetal scalp electrode (FSE). This is screwed into the fetus' presenting part through the opening in the cervix (requires ruptured membranes and adequate dilation). This signal is usually more reliable, but entails risks of chorioamnionitis, fetal scalp infection, scalp hematoma, and potential vertical transmission of maternal viruses including HIV and hepatitis.
Recently, devices have come to market that extract the FHR and uterine electromyograph (EMG) from maternal abdominal electrodes. The proposed study will provide data for refinement of the LaborView device produced by OBMedical.
Specific Aims:
The goal of this research is to evaluate the LaborView device under various settings and fetal heart rate accuracy as compared to a traditional CTG monitor.
Research Plan:
All patients admitted to the Labor & Delivery Suite at UF Health, will be eligible for inclusion in the study except minors and those unable to consent for themselves.
Following written informed consent, the external monitors (tocodynamometer and ultrasound) may not be removed. Per LaborView directions, electrode application sites will be prepared to reduce skin impedance, electrodes will be applied to the maternal abdomen and data acquired for comparison with CTG data obtained through the traditional monitoring system. FHR, ECG (electrocardiography), and uterine activity data from the existing fetal monitors will be collected via a laptop PC connected to the systems for comparison. The comparison will be performed off-line.
Evaluation of the data obtained will include (1) comparison of the calculated FHR with that of the CTG and/or fetal scalp electrode.
Nothing is required of the subjects. They will be non-invasively monitored for one to several hours. The information obtained will not be used for medical decision-making and there is no significant risk to the patient or her fetus. No longitudinal follow-up is planned or indicated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnant Females | All patients admitted to the Labor & Delivery Suite at UF Health, will be eligible for inclusion in the study except minors and those unable to consent for themselves. Nothing is required of the subjects. They will be non-invasively monitored for one to several hours. The information obtained will not be used for medical decision-making and there is no significant risk to the patient or her fetus. No longitudinal follow-up is planned or indicated. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LaborView Electronic Fetal Monitor | Device | Per LaborView directions, electrode application sites will be prepared to reduce skin impedance, electrodes will be applied to the maternal abdomen and FHR data acquired for comparison with CTG data obtained through the traditional monitoring system. The comparison will be performed off-line. Nothing is required of the subjects. They will be non-invasively monitored for one to several hours. The information obtained will not be used for medical decision-making and there is no significant risk to the patient or her fetus. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fetal Heart Rate With the Laborview System Versus the CTG Monitor - Pilot Comparison Study | Using standard of care CTG (Cardiotocography) already in place and the LaborView electrode-based FHR monitoring simultaneously, we will collect FHR data from both monitors simultaneously. We will compare the two FHR calculations using root mean squared error (RMSE). | 1 - 8 hours |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
• Under the age of 18
Only Pregnant Females
Pregnant Females admitted to Labor and Delivery at Shands UF Health who are over the age of 18 and able to consent themselves.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Florida Shands Health | Gainesville | Florida | 32608 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Pregnant Females | All patients admitted to the Labor & Delivery Suite at UF Health, will be eligible for inclusion in the study except minors and those unable to consent for themselves. Nothing is required of the participants. They will be non-invasively monitored for one to several hours. The information obtained will not be used for medical decision-making and there is no significant risk to the patient or her fetus. No longitudinal follow-up is planned or indicated. LaborView Electronic Fetal Monitor: Per LaborView directions, electrode application sites will be prepared to reduce skin impedance, electrodes will be applied to the maternal abdomen and data acquired for comparison with CTG data obtained through the traditional monitoring system. FHR, ECG, and uterine activity data from the existing fetal monitors will be collected via a laptop PC connected to the systems for comparison. The comparison will be performed off-line. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Pregnant Females | All patients admitted to the Labor & Delivery Suite at UF Health, will be eligible for inclusion in the study except minors and those unable to consent for themselves. Nothing is required of the subjects. They will be non-invasively monitored for one to several hours. The information obtained will not be used for medical decision-making and there is no significant risk to the patient or her fetus. No longitudinal follow-up is planned or indicated. LaborView Electronic Fetal Monitor: Per LaborView directions, electrode application sites will be prepared to reduce skin impedance, electrodes will be applied to the maternal abdomen and data acquired for comparison with CTG data obtained through the traditional monitoring system. FHR, ECG, and uterine activity data from the existing fetal monitors will be collected via a laptop PC connected to the systems for comparison. The comparison will be performed off-line. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Fetal Heart Rate With the Laborview System Versus the CTG Monitor - Pilot Comparison Study | Using standard of care CTG (Cardiotocography) already in place and the LaborView electrode-based FHR monitoring simultaneously, we will collect FHR data from both monitors simultaneously. We will compare the two FHR calculations using root mean squared error (RMSE). | Posted | Mean | 90% Confidence Interval | beats per minute | 1 - 8 hours |
|
11 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Pregnant Females | All patients admitted to the Labor & Delivery Suite at UF Health, will be eligible for inclusion in the study except minors and those unable to consent for themselves. LaborView Electronic Fetal Monitor: Per LaborView directions, electrode application sites will be prepared to reduce skin impedance, electrodes will be applied to the maternal abdomen and data acquired for comparison with CTG data obtained through the traditional monitoring system. FHR, ECG, and uterine activity data from the existing fetal monitors will be collected via a laptop PC connected to the systems for comparison. The comparison will be performed off-line. Nothing is required of the participants. They will be non-invasively monitored for one to several hours. The information obtained will not be used for medical decision-making and there is no significant risk to the patient or her fetus. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Tammy Euliano | UF Health Department of Anesthesiology | 352-514-7460 | teuliano@anest.ufl.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Sep 29, 2016 | Aug 20, 2018 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 29, 2016 | Aug 20, 2018 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Sep 29, 2016 | Aug 20, 2018 | ICF_002.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Number of Subjects in active labor | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 35 |
| 0 |
| 35 |
| 0 |
| 35 |
Not provided
Not provided