Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust | OTHER |
| Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of the study is to determine if CGM can reduce hypoglycemia and improve quality of life in older adults with T1D.
Reducing hypoglycemia is an important aspect of management of T1D in older adults, many of whom have hypoglycemic unawareness, cognitive impairment, or both. CGM offers the opportunity to reduce hypoglycemia and its related complications such as fractures from falls and hospitalizations and improve quality of life including reducing hypoglycemic fear and diabetes distress. Despite these potential benefits, CGM is used by only a small proportion of older adults with T1D. Previous studies assessing CGM efficacy have included only a small number of adults ≥ 60 years of age, excluded patients most prone to severe hypoglycemia, focused on improving HbA1c rather than hypoglycemia, and used older generation CGM sensors. These studies are not generalizable to the population of older adults with T1D. The potential benefit of CGM in reducing hypoglycemia in the older adult population has not been well studied. The goal of this study is to assess the potential benefits and risks of CGM in older adults with T1D.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous Glucose Monitor group | Active Comparator | CGM group participants will be asked to use a Dexcom CGM sensor on a daily basis, inserting a new sensor as needed. Participants will be instructed to use the sensor according to FDA labeling. In addition, participants will be advised to check the blood glucose when symptoms or expectations do not match the CGM reading. Participants will have clinic visits at 10 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 26 weeks. |
|
| Blood Glucose Meter group | No Intervention | BGM group participants will be asked to use a study blood glucose meter with test strips for a fingerstick blood glucose check with a recommendation of 4 times a day. Participants will be permitted to check a fingerstick glucose as many times a day as they choose. Participants will have a phone visits at 10 days and clinic visits at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 26 weeks. In addition to the in-clinic study visits, the BGM group will have blinded sensor placement visits one week prior to each of the 8, 16, and 26 week visits. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dexcom CGM | Device | CGM group will be instructed on how to utilize the CGM data for diabetes management. Participants will be encouraged to use CGM values for making diabetes management decisions and will be provided guidelines for when to confirm with a study BGM fingerstick. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time spent with glucose level <70 mg/dL | The primary outcome will be a treatment group comparison of the percentage of sensor values in the hypoglycemic range (<70 mg/dL), adjusted for the baseline values and factors used to stratify randomization in a regression model. Residual values will be examined for an approximate normal distribution. If values are highly skewed, then a transformation or non-parametric methods will be used instead. The BGM Group will be wearing a blinded CGM for one week at 3 time points in the study (in addition to baseline). For analysis, sensor data from the CGM Group will be used from these same time periods to match up with the blinded CGM placed for the BGM Group. The CGM data will be pooled across each time point of CGM data collection for the primary analysis. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in HbA1c | Mean ± SD values for the change in HbA1c from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be computed for each randomization group and compared in a regression model adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of episodes of severe hypoglycemia | A hypoglycemic event will be defined as severe low blood sugar requiring assistance of another person due to altered or loss of consciousness. The rate of episodes will be tabulated and assessed using a regression model adjusted for baseline number of events. | baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) |
Inclusion Criteria:
To be eligible for the study, all participants must meet the following criteria:
Clinical diagnosis of insulin dependent presumed autoimmune type 1 diabetes by the investigator and meeting at least one of the following criteria:
i. Age > 6 months and < 10 years old at diagnosis OR ii. Positive pancreatic autoantibodies at any time (GAD-65, IA-2, ICA or ZnT8) or positive anti-insulin autoantibody at diagnosis only (within 10 days of starting insulin) OR iii. Presence of 2 or more of the following clinical indicators suggestive of type 1 diabetes:
Age ≥60 years
HbA1c <10.0% at screening or within 30 days prior to screening visit (the upper limit was selected as a surrogate measure of likelihood of adherence to the protocol with the belief that those with higher HbA1c levels are generally noncompliant with diabetes management and thus not good candidates for the trial)
Insulin regimen involves either use of an insulin pump (a minimum of 40% of study population) or multiple daily injections of insulin (minimum of 40% of study population).
Participant is able to manage his/her diabetes with respect to insulin administration and glucose monitoring (which may include assistance from spouse or other caregiver)
Participant understands the study protocol and agrees to comply with it
Participant comprehends written and spoken English
At least 240 hours (10 out of 14 days) of sensor glucose data with appropriate number of calibrations from the blinded CGM pre-randomization phase
Exclusion Criteria:
Individuals meeting any of the following exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kellee Miller | Jaeb Center for Health Research | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Southern California | Beverly Hills | California | 90211 | United States | ||
| Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35294272 | Derived | Miller KM, Kanapka LG, Rickels MR, Ahmann AJ, Aleppo G, Ang L, Bhargava A, Bode BW, Carlson A, Chaytor NS, Gannon G, Goland R, Hirsch IB, Kiblinger L, Kruger D, Kudva YC, Levy CJ, McGill JB, O'Malley G, Peters AL, Philipson LH, Philis-Tsimikas A, Pop-Busui R, Salam M, Shah VN, Thompson MJ, Vendrame F, Verdejo A, Weinstock RS, Young L, Pratley R. Benefit of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Reducing Hypoglycemia Is Sustained Through 12 Months of Use Among Older Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Jun;24(6):424-434. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0503. Epub 2022 Apr 11. | |
| 32543682 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Change in QOL: Preferring Hypoglycemia Scale | Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Change in QOL: Blood glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Questionnaire | Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Change in QOL: Hypoglycemia Fear Survey | Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Change in QOL: Diabetes Distress Questionnaire | Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Change in QOL: PROMIS Measures for QOL | Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Change in QOL: NIH Cognitive Toolbox | Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Change in QOL: NIH Emotions Toolbox | Mean ± SD values for the change in total and composite score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Time spent with glucose level <60 mg/dL | Analyses will be similar to the primary objective. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Time spent with glucose level <54 mg/dL | Analyses will be similar to the primary objective. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Rate of episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis events |
A diabetic ketoacidosis event will be defined as hyperglycemia meeting all of the following criteria:
The rate of episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis will be tabulated and assessed using a regression model adjusted for baseline number of events. |
| baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) |
| Number of falls | The number of falls and any resulting injuries will be tabulated and compared between treatment groups using a Fisher's exact test. | baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) |
| Number of ER visits | The number of ER visits will be tabulated and compared between treatment groups using a Fisher's exact test. | baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) |
| Number of hospitalizations | The number of hospitalizations will be tabulated and compared between treatment groups using a Fishers's exact test. | baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) |
| Number of device-related adverse events | The study investigator will determine if an adverse event (severe hypoglycemic events, diabetic ketoacidosis events, falls, hospitalizations, ER visits, etc.) may have been caused by the study intervention (CGM) by any of the following:
The number of device-related adverse events will be tabulated and compared between treatment groups using a Fisher's exact test. | baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) |
| Hyperglycemia: time >180 mg/dL | Time spent >180 mg/dL will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Hyperglycemia: time >250 mg/dL | Time spent >250 mg/dL will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Hyperglycemia: time >300mg/dL | Time spent >300mg/dL will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Hyperglycemia: area under the curve 180 mg/dL | The area under the curve for 180 mg/dL will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Hyperglycemia: high blood glucose index | High blood glucose index will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Time in range 70-180 mg/dL | The time in range (70-180 mg/dL) will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Mean glucose | Mean glucose will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| Glycemic variability (coefficient of variation) | Glycemic variability will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective. | 6 months (26 weeks) from baseline |
| La Jolla |
| California |
| 92037 |
| United States |
| University of Colorado - Barbara Davis Center | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States |
| University of Miami | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| Florida Hospital Diabetes Institute | Orlando | Florida | 32804 | United States |
| Atlanta Diabetes Associates | Atlanta | Georgia | 30318 | United States |
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| University of Chicago | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| Iowa Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center | West Des Moines | Iowa | 50265 | United States |
| University of Massachusetts | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| University of Michigan | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48105 | United States |
| Henry Ford Health System | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| International Diabetes Center | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55416 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Washington University | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| Columbia University - Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| SUNY Upstate Medical University | Syracuse | New York | 13210 | United States |
| University of North Carolina | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27517 | United States |
| Oregon Health & Science University | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| University of Washington Diabetes Care Center | Seattle | Washington | 98105 | United States |
| Derived |
| Pratley RE, Kanapka LG, Rickels MR, Ahmann A, Aleppo G, Beck R, Bhargava A, Bode BW, Carlson A, Chaytor NS, Fox DS, Goland R, Hirsch IB, Kruger D, Kudva YC, Levy C, McGill JB, Peters A, Philipson L, Philis-Tsimikas A, Pop-Busui R, Shah VN, Thompson M, Vendrame F, Verdejo A, Weinstock RS, Young L, Miller KM; Wireless Innovation for Seniors With Diabetes Mellitus (WISDM) Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2397-2406. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6928. |
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2020 | Aug 31, 2020 | 4 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided