Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study intends to compare the efficacy of of virtual reality therapy(VRT) with modified constraint induced movement therapy(mCIMT) versus modified constraint induced movement therapy alone for children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy aged >/= 5-18 years, in improving the upper limb functions, as measured by the QUEST (Quality of Upper Extremity Skill Test score) over 3 months of intervention.
Sample size: Based on the previous studies, on CIMT in hemiparetic CP children using QUEST scores,
Anticipated increase in total QUEST scores at 2 months in the mCIMT group:
10 + 5(mean + SD)
Anticipated increase in total QUEST scores at 2 months in the mCIMT+ VRT group:
15 + 5(mean + SD)
Alpha error= 5%
Power= 80%
Calculated sample size : 23 children in each group
Considering loss due to attrition of roughly 25%,investigators would enroll 30 children in each of the two groups.
At least 10 children in each group will be analyzed with baseline and follow up fMRI and DTI. These children in each group will be selected through systematic sampling method.
Method:
Block randomization in 1:1 ratio with variable block size will be done using computer generated random numbers. These will be generated by the person not involved in the trial. Subjects will be randomized to
Each random number will be kept in an opaque sealed envelope and will be opened only at the time of enrollment of the study subjects.Principal investigator will then enroll the participants, and will assign the participants to interventions. After obtaining informed consent from parents, and assent from the children participating in the trial(whenever possible), of hemiparetic cerebral palsy, subjects will be enrolled in the study as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Details for each patient will be recorded in a structured proforma
The total study duration will be 3 months, of which 2 months of supervised intervention will be given.Home based therapy will be continued all through the 3 months of intervention in both the groups.
CIMT(Control group and intervention group) :
• Sling will be applied to the unaffected arm, as a restraint (sling will be provided free of cost). mCIMT will be performed for 2 hours per session during the scheduled visits(in the control group) and 2 hours every day at home(by both the groups). Functional activities will be carried out by the affected, unrestrained arm under supervision. Repetitive activities and shaping will be practiced. mCIMT will be provided by trained occupational therapist, first investigator and with the caregiver's participation and would be tailor made to each patient. At each visit, the methodology followed at home will be reviewed (log books with/without video records). Reinforcement will be provided at each visit regarding subsequent therapy to be done at home.
VRT(Intervention group only):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality Therapy | Experimental | Intervention: Virtual Reality therapy(VRT) reinforcing modified Constraint Induced Movement therapy(mCIMT) VRT will be administered using computer based program. mCIMT will be administered using the physical rehabilitation protocol. |
|
| mCIMT | Active Comparator | Intervention: Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy Only mCIMT will be administered using the physical rehabilitation protocol. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Reality Therapy | Other | VRT software and device is developed in collaboration with IIT Delhi using Kinect system. Kinect- motion sensor and computer set up is required. VRT (CIMT in a virtual environment)will be provided for 2 hours at every visit(twice weekly for first 4 weeks, once a week for next 4 weeks). VRT will be provided only during scheduled visits with the same principle as mCIMT. Functional activities like repetition of the tasks and shaping will be performed with the affected hand using VRT and CIMT while the unaffected arm is restrained |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 8 weeks of VRT with mCIMT versus mCIMT alone | The primary objective is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 8 weeks of modified constraint induced movement therapy (mCIMT) reinforced with virtual reality therapy(VRT) with modified constraint induced movement therapy alone, in improving the upper limb function in >5-18 years old children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy, by using the QUEST scoring(Quality Of Upper Extremity Skill Test Score) in the two groups. | Within 1 week of completing 8 weeks, from the beginning of intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To compare the improvement in the sub domains(dissociated movements, grasp, protective extension and weight bearing) of QUEST score between the 2 groups | QUEST is the Quality Of Upper Extremity Skill Test. It assesses quality of the dissociated movements, grasp, weight bearing and protective extension. In each group at the end of 8 weeks the QUEST score will be chronicled for each of the domains and compared between the intervention and control group. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheffali Gulati, MD | Contact | +91-11-26594679 | sheffaligulati@gmail.com ; sheffalig@yahoo.com | |
| SHRUTHI N M, MBBS, MD | Contact | 8585958771 | drshrutinm@gmail.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010291 | Paresis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D063367 | Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003887 | Desensitization, Psychologic |
| D001521 | Behavior Therapy |
| D011613 | Psychotherapy |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
Not provided
Not provided
An open labeled, randomized controlled, parallel design, superiority trial
Not provided
Not provided
The outcome assessor will be masked to the group allocation and the intervention
|
| mCIMT | Other | Modified constraint induced movement therapy will be provided to all children according to predefined protocol. |
|
| Within 1 week of completing 8 weeks, from the beginning of intervention |
| Comparing the improvement in speed of movements between 2 groups | This will be assessed using the nine hole peg board. The difference in change in mean time to complete the nine hole peg board will be compared between the two groups. | Within 1 week of completing 8 weeks,from the beginning of intervention |
| Comparing the improvement in muscle strength between 2 groups | The muscle strength will be assessed by hand held dynamometer. The change in muscle strength measured in pounds by hand held dynamometer will be compared between two groups. | Within 1 week of completing 8 weeks,from the beginning of intervention |
| Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging(fMRI) in the 2 groups | To describe functional magnetic resonance imaging(fMRI) changes in a pre-defined motor paradigm of the paretic upper limb in terms of changes in BOLD(Blood Level Oxygen Dependent) cluster activation of ipsilesional (contralteral *) somatosensory cortex; laterality Index of Broadmann Area 4 (BA4) and Broadman area 6 (BA6), and ipsilateral cerebellum activation ratio during the motor task performance of the paretic upper limb in fMRI Brain in both the groups | Upto 1 week before starting mCIMT+ VRT program and within 1 week of completing 08 weeks, from the beginning of the intervention |
| fMRI changes copared with clinical improvement in 2 groups before and after intervention | This is done by comparing changes in fMRI brain in terms of BOLD cluster activation of contralateral and ipsilateral somatosensory cortex with clinical assessment of upper limb function in terms of QUEST score between the two groups | Upto 1 week before starting mCIMT+ VRT program and within 1 week of completing 08 weeks, from the beginning of the intervention |
| DTI(Diffusion Tensor Imaging) changes compared with clinical improvement in 2 groups before and after intervention | This is done by comparing changes in diffusion tensor imaging findings in terms of fractional anisotropy value of the lesion with clinical assessment of upper limb function in terms of QUEST scores between the two groups | Upto 1 week before starting mCIMT+ VRT program and within 1 week of completing 08 weeks, from the beginning of the intervention |
| Diffusion Tensor Imaging changes in 2 groups | To describe changes in Diffusion Tensor Imaging findings in terms of fractional anisotropy value of the lesion between the two groups(performed at baseline, and within one week of completion of 8 weeks of intervention) | Upto 1 week before starting mCIMT+ VRT program and within 1 week of completing 08 weeks, from the beginning of the intervention |
| Sustained improvement | This is done by assessing the difference in change in total QUEST scores at baseline and at 12 weeks of intervention, between the intervention and the control groups, and assessing the persistence of improvement, 4 weeks after stopping supervised intervention. | Baseline and at 12 weeks of intervention |
| Quality of life improvement | Cerebral Palsy- Quality Of Life scale for children(CP-QOL child) will be applied at baseline and at 8 weeks of intervention. Difference in change in CP-QOL scores at baseline and at 8 weeks of intervention will be compared between two groups. | At the end of 8 weeks, from the beginning of intervention |
| Compliance | Parents will be asked to maintain daily activity monitoring log. The compliance in two groups will be assessed based on this log. | At the end of 8 weeks, from the beginning of intervention |