Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| European Vision Institute Clinical Research Network | NETWORK |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to create a database of keratoconic eyes with two or more corneal topographies/tomographies, at least 5 months apart
Title: Keratometry values such as K1, K2 and the angle between these two; Value and location of the thinnest corneal point; Pachymetry progression (radial change of pachymetry); IS value (i.e., ratio of average curvature in superior and inferior sections)
Description:
The primary endpoint is to obtain a database, containing at least two valid corneal biometry measurements (Scheimpflug) recorded at least 5 months apart, for a predetermined number of suitable keratoconus patients.
These data will be used to create a personalized three-dimensional model of the cornea at each time point, which permits classifying corneas according to shape and stage, as well as assessing the influence of patient age, gender, family history and ophthalmic habits (e.g. eye rubbing) on keratoconus progression. Based on corneal changes over time, an estimate of the underlying biomechanical changes will be made. All these data will then be combined to develop software for automated keratoconus detection and progression risk assessment to help ophthalmologists decide when to perform crosslinking on their patients.
The primary variables are the elevation parameters derived directly from the Scheimpflug measuring device export files, along with the demographic and medical information (if available).
Time frame: 5 months
Once a predictive model for keratoconus progression speed based on multiple measurements, this can be improved to make predictions based on a single measurement. Furthermore, the database obtained in this work will also be a valuable resource to analyse the variation in keratoconus shape, which may lead to an improved classification of keratoconus types
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keratoconus patients | This study involves a retrospective analysis of data recorded during routine clinical follow-up of keratoconus patients. As such, the impact for the patient is minimal as no additional tests need to be performed |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To obtain a database, containing at least two valid corneal Scheimpflug measurements recorded at least 5 months apart, of 1500 keratoconus patients. | These data will be used to create a personalized three-dimensional model of the cornea at each time point, which permits classifying corneas according to shape and stage, as well as assessing the influence of patient age, gender, family history and ophthalmic habits (e.g. eye rubbing) on keratoconus progression. Based on corneal changes over time, an estimate of the underlying biomechanical changes will be made. | 5 months |
| To develop software to automatically detect keratoconus and estimate the keratoconus progression speed | The data from Outcome 1 will be combined to develop software for automated keratoconus detection and progression risk assessment to help ophthalmologists decide when to perform cross-linking on their patients. | 18 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To improve the predictive model for keratoconus progression speed so it can work using only one single measurement | Once a predictive model for keratoconus progression speed based on multiple measurements, this can be improved to make predictions based on a single measurement. | 18 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study involves a retrospective analysis of data recorded during routine clinical follow-up of keratoconus patients. As such, the impact for the patient is minimal as no additions tests need to be performed
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antwerp University Hospital | Edegem | 2650 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37816249 | Derived | Koppen C, Jimenez-Garcia M, Kreps EO, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Rozema JJ; REDCAKE Study Group. Definitions for Keratoconus Progression and Their Impact on Clinical Practice. Eye Contact Lens. 2024 Jan 1;50(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001038. Epub 2023 Oct 9. | |
| 34050086 | Derived | Jimenez-Garcia M, Kreps EO, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Koppen C, Rozema JJ; REDCAKE Study Group. Determining the Most Suitable Tomography-Based Parameters to Describe Progression in Keratoconus. The Retrospective Digital Computer Analysis of Keratoconus Evolution Project. Eye Contact Lens. 2021 Sep 1;47(9):486-493. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000800. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007640 | Keratoconus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003316 | Corneal Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 32541189 | Derived | Jimenez-Garcia M, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Koppen C, Varssano D, Rozema JJ; and The REDCAKE Study Group. Baseline Findings in the Retrospective Digital Computer Analysis of Keratoconus Evolution (REDCAKE) Project. Cornea. 2021 Feb 1;40(2):156-167. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002389. |