Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the diagnostic performance and cost-effectiveness of the MRI-driven diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer, with upfront individual multivariate risk stratification.
Screening for prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most controversial issues in urological practice. Although robust data from the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) suggest a disease specific survival benefit in favor of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based PCa screening, the coinciding unfavorable harm-benefit precludes that PCa screening can be adopted as a public health policy. The diagnostic pathway needs to be optimized to reduce unnecessary testing and to avoid diagnosing those cancers that will never harm a patient if not detected through screening. Some men may thus benefit from PCa screening, but with the currently used diagnostics (i.e. the PSA test and systematic TRUS (transrectal ultrasound )-guided prostate biopsy) many more men are harmed by unnecessary testing and the cascade of diagnostic and treatment related events that follow.
Further refinements to screening strategies, focusing on detecting only those PCa that are potentially life threatening (clinically significant) are needed to become acceptable to the general population and health care providers. The investigators propose such a refinement within this protocol, with upfront individual risk prediction and in addition a MRI-driven diagnostic pathway in only those men that are considered to be at intermediate/high-risk of having a potentially life threatening PCa (in general defined as Gleason sum Score (GS) =7).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-risk PCa | No TRUS-guided biopsy | ||
| Intermediate/high-risk PCa (Control) | TRUS-guided biopsy 'only' (current standard practice). |
| |
| Intermediate/high-risk PCa (Intervention 1) | TRUS-guided biopsy 'first'; if indicated followed by MRI and targeted biopsies. |
| |
| Intermediate/high-risk PCa (Intervention 2) | MRI-'first', followed by TRUS-guided and targeted biopsies. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| biopsy | Diagnostic Test | prostate biopsy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of detected csPCa | Proportion of study population with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), correctly identified by Risk-assessment + MRI-driven pathway | 36 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of biopsy procedures in relation to detected csPCa. | Number of prostate biopsy procedures in relation to the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. | 36 months |
| Proportion of unnecessary TRUS-guided and targeted biopsies |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Men are eligible for the study if there is a clinical suspicion of harbouring prostate cancer without previous prostate biopsies. This essentially includes men with an elevated PSA (≥ 3 ng/ml) and/or a suspicious DRE, or family history of prostate cancer.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ivo Schoots, Dr | Erasmus Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erasmusmc | Rotterdam | South Holland | 3015CE | Netherlands |
Still under consideration
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001706 | Biopsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003581 | Cytodiagnosis |
| D003584 | Cytological Techniques |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Proportion of TRUS-guided and targeted biopsies that could have been avoided safely.
| 36 months |
| CEA Risk stratification-MRI | Diagnostic health care cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of Risicowijzer-MRI-driven pathway. | 36 months |
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |