Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-001224-22 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
The top-line results from the Part 1 did not meet the pre-specified primary endpoint nor the key secondary endpoints. The decision to discontinue study 215MS202 Part 2 was not based on safety concerns.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of Part 1 of this study is to evaluate the effects of BIIB033 versus placebo on disability improvement over 72 weeks. The primary objective of Part 2 of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety profile of BIIB033 as an add-on therapy in participants with MS.
The secondary objective of Part 1 is to evaluate the effects of BIIB033 versus placebo on additional measures of disability improvement. The secondary objective of Part 2 is to investigate long-term efficacy (disability improvement) and additional safety measures of BIIB033 as an add-on therapy in participants with MS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIIB033 (opicinumab) 750 mg | Experimental | Participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) will receive BIIB033 750 milligram (mg) intravenously (IV) as an add-on therapy to a background disease-modifying therapy (DMT) once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks in Part 1 and once every 4 weeks over 96 weeks in Part 2. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants with RMS will receive placebo IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks in Part 1 and BIIB033 once every 4 weeks over 96 weeks in Part 2. The placebo looks like BIIB033 but does not contain the active ingredient that is thought to have an effect on MS disease. The placebo used in this study is sterile normal saline (water with a small amount of sodium chloride [salt]). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIIB033 (opicinumab) | Drug | Administered as specified in the treatment arm |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Overall Response Score | Overall Response Score is a multicomponent score based on 4 components: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test in the dominant hand (9HPT-D), and 9HPT in the nondominant hand (9HPT-ND). Overall Score was sum of 4 components at each visit and ranges from +4 (improvement) to -4 (worsening). At each visit, each component is given a score relative to baseline (BL): -1 if threshold is met for worsening, 0 if no changes meet threshold criteria, or +1 if threshold is met for improvement. For T25FW and 9HPT improvement is ≥15% decrease in time from BL and worsening is ≥15% increase in time from BL. For EDSS, improvement is: ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0, and worsening is defined as a ≥1-point increase from a BL score of ≤5.5 or a ≥0.5-point increase from a BL score equal to 6.0. Positive Overall Response Score indicated that there was improvement in more components than there was worsening. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| Part 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, life-threatening event, requires inpatient hospitalization, significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly. | Part 2: Baseline to Week 169 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement. |
Not provided
Key Inclusion Criteria: Part 1
Key Inclusion Criteria: Part 2
-Subjects who complete study treatment (BIIB033 or placebo) at Part 1/Week 72 Visit.
Key Exclusion Criteria: Part 1
Key Exclusion Criteria: Part 2
NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Director | Biogen | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Cullman | Alabama | 35058 | United States | ||
| Research Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41454463 | Derived | Calabresi PA, Giovannoni G, Hartung HP, Naismith RT, Fox RJ, Sormani MP, Arnold DL, Kappos L, Valis M, Newsome SD, Belkin MI, Bartholome E, Riester K, Javor A, Lyons J, Bradley DP, Fisher E, Tagge I, Naylor ML, Belachew S, Deykin A, Franchimont N, Zhu B, Cheng W. Safety and efficacy of opicinumab in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis (AFFINITY Part 1): A randomized, controlled, phase 2 trial. Mult Scler. 2026 Jan;32(1):107-120. doi: 10.1177/13524585251396433. Epub 2025 Dec 26. | |
| 37036134 |
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 263 participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) were randomized in Part 1 (Placebo-controlled) of the study to receive BIIB033 or placebo. Participants who completed Part 1 and were eligible were enrolled into Part 2 (Open-label) of the study to receive BIIB033. Part 2 of the study was terminated early based on Sponsor's decision.
Participants were enrolled at the investigative sites in the Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom and United States from 15 November 2017 to 12 February 2021.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Part 1: Placebo | Participants with RMS received placebo intravenously (IV) as an add-on therapy to a background disease-modifying therapy (DMT) once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks. |
| FG001 | Part 1: BIIB033 750 mg |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 (Week 0 to Week 72) |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Feb 13, 2019 | Mar 31, 2022 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo |
| Drug |
Administered as specified in the treatment arm |
|
| Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or 3-Second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3) | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS (scale range: 0-10), higher scores=more disability and improvement defined as ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from BL score ≤6.0. T25FW is quantitative mobility and leg function performance test, where timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time=slower walking. 9HPT is quantitative test of upper extremity function, measures time to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove pegs. Longer time=poorer upper limb function. PASAT assesses auditory information processing speed. In 3-second PASAT, numbers are presented at a rate of 1 every 3 seconds with scores (range 0-120), higher scores=better working memory. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL is improvement. For PASAT ≥15% increase from BL is improvement. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and Without Confirmed Worsening in Any of the 4 Assessments During the 72 Weeks of the Study | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0, and worsening is defined as a ≥1-point increase from a BL score of ≤5.5 or a ≥0.5-point increase from a BL score equal to 6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement and ≥15% increase in time from BL indicates worsening. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale (range 0-10), higher scores=more disability. For EDSS, improvement is: a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time=slower walking. 9HPT is quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove pegs. Longer time=poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement. The SDMT measures time to pair abstract geometric symbols with specific numbers. The score is the number of correctly coded items (range 0-110) in 90 seconds, higher scores=better outcome. Improvement is: ≥4-point increase from BL. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% Thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT) | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement. | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| Part 2: Overall Response Score | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
| Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 |
| Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or PASAT-3 | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 |
| Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and Without Confirmed Worsening in Any of the 4 Assessments During the 96 Weeks of the Study | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
| Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and SDMT | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 |
| Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% Thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT) | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 |
| Part 2: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Laboratory assessments including hematology and blood chemistry were evaluated for safety. Criteria for abnormality: In 10^9/liter (L) [white blood cells <3.0/>16, neutrophils <1.5/ >13.5, lymphocytes <0.8/ >12, monocytes >2.5, eosinophils >1.6, basophils >1.6, platelets <=75/ >=700], hemoglobin <=95 [female (F)] or <=115 [male (M)] or >=175 (F) or >=190 (M) gram per liter (g/L), hematocrit <=32 (F) or <=37 (M) or >=54 (F) or >=60 (M) percentage (%), red blood cells <=3.5/ >=6.4 10^12/L, in millimoles per liter (mmol/L) [sodium <=126/ >=156, potassium <=3/ >=6, chloride <=90/ >=118, bicarbonate <=16/ >=35, calcium <=2/ >=3, phosphorous <=0.5491/ >=1.7119, glucose (non-fasting) <=2.2/>=13.75], AST/SGOT >=3x upper limit of normal (ULN), ALT/SGPT >=3xULN, alkaline phosphatase >=3xULN, creatinine >=1.5xULN, total bilirubin >=1.5xULN, total protein <=45/ >=100 g/L, albumin <=25 g/L, uric acid >=501.5 (F)/>=619.5 (M) micromole (umol)/L | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
| Part 2: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | The ECG result was classified as "normal", "abnormal", "abnormal, not adverse event", or "abnormal, adverse event". Shift to 'abnormal, not adverse event' included shift from normal or unknown to 'abnormal, not adverse event'. Shift to 'abnormal, adverse event' included shift from normal or unknown to 'abnormal, adverse event'. | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
| Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values | Vital sign measurements including temperature, pulse rate (supine), systolic blood pressure (BP) and diastolic (supine) BP were evaluated for safety. Criteria for abnormalities: Temperature: >38 degree celsius (â—¦C) or >=1 â—¦C increase from baseline (BL); Pulse: [>100 beats per minute (bpm) or increase from BL of >30 bpm] or (<40 bpm or decrease from BL of >20 bpm); Systolic BP: [>160 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)/increase from BL of >40 mmHg] or (<90 mmHg/decrease from BL of >30 mmHg); Diastolic BP: (>100 mmHg/increase from BL of >30 mmHg) or (<45 mmHg/decrease from BL of >20 mmHg). | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
| Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Weight Values | Criteria for abnormality was defined as a >7% increase or decrease in weight at the specified time point. | Part 2: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 |
| Part 2: Number of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score at Any Post-Baseline Visit | C-SSRS systematically assess suicidal ideation and behavior rating scale. It rates an individual's degree of suicidal ideation on a scale, ranging from "wish to be dead" to "active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent and behaviors". The scale identifies specific behaviors ranging from "preparatory acts or behavior" to "suicide" which may be indicative of an individual's intent to complete suicide. | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
| Gilbert |
| Arizona |
| 85234 |
| United States |
| Research Site | Berkeley | California | 94705 | United States |
| Research Site | Long Beach | California | 90806 | United States |
| Research Site | Newport Beach | California | 92663 | United States |
| Research Site | Orange | California | 92868 | United States |
| Research Site | Centennial | Colorado | 80112 | United States |
| Research Site | Fort Collins | Colorado | 80528 | United States |
| Research Site | Stamford | Connecticut | 06905 | United States |
| Research Site | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20007 | United States |
| Research Site | Sunrise | Florida | 33351 | United States |
| Research Site | Tampa | Florida | 33612 | United States |
| Research Site | Atlanta | Georgia | 30309 | United States |
| Research Site | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
| Research Site | Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| Research Site | Overland Park | Kansas | 66212 | United States |
| Research Site | Lexington | Kentucky | 40513 | United States |
| Research Site | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| Research Site | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Research Site | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| Research Site | Lexington | Massachusetts | 01805 | United States |
| Research Site | Wellesley | Massachusetts | 02481 | United States |
| Research Site | Farmington Hills | Michigan | 48334 | United States |
| Research Site | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55422 | United States |
| Research Site | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Research Site | St Louis | Missouri | 63131 | United States |
| Research Site | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89106 | United States |
| Research Site | Freehold | New Jersey | 07728 | United States |
| Research Site | Teaneck | New Jersey | 07666 | United States |
| Research Site | Latham | New York | 12110 | United States |
| Research Site | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| Research Site | Patchogue | New York | 11772 | United States |
| Research Site | Rochester | New York | 14642 | United States |
| Research Site | Stony Brook | New York | 11794 | United States |
| Research Site | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Research Site | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27607 | United States |
| Research Site | Columbus | Ohio | 43214 | United States |
| Research Site | Dayton | Ohio | 45417 | United States |
| Research Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73104 | United States |
| Research Site | Portland | Oregon | 97225 | United States |
| Research Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Research Site | Willow Grove | Pennsylvania | 19090 | United States |
| Research Site | Knoxville | Tennessee | 37922 | United States |
| Research Site | Memphis | Tennessee | 38018 | United States |
| Research Site | Dallas | Texas | 75390-8806 | United States |
| Research Site | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Research Site | Round Rock | Texas | 78681 | United States |
| Research Site | Orem | Utah | 84058 | United States |
| Research Site | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84103 | United States |
| Research Site | Seattle | Washington | 98122 | United States |
| Research Site | Seattle | Washington | 98133 | United States |
| Research Site | Box Hill | Victoria | 3128 | Australia |
| Research Site | Clayton | Victoria | 3168 | Australia |
| Research Site | Heidelberg | Victoria | 3084 | Australia |
| Research Site | Melbourne | Victoria | 3004 | Australia |
| Research Site | Parkville | Victoria | 3050 | Australia |
| Research Site | New Lambton Heights | NS 2305 | Australia |
| Research Site | Westmead | 2145 | Australia |
| Research Site | Bruges | 8000 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Brussels | 1090 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Brussels | 1200 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Ghent | 9000 | Belgium |
| Research Site | La Louvière | 7100 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Roeselare | 8800 | Belgium |
| Research Site | Edmonton | Alberta | T6G 1Z1 | Canada |
| Research Site | Vancouver | British Columbia | V6T 1Z3 | Canada |
| Research Site | Victoria | British Columbia | V8R 1J8 | Canada |
| Research Site | Ottawa | Ontario | K1H8L6 | Canada |
| Research Site | Toronto | Ontario | M5B1W8 | Canada |
| Research Site | Gatineau | Quebec | J8Y 1W2 | Canada |
| Research Site | Longueuil | Quebec | J4V2J2 | Canada |
| Research Site | Montreal | Quebec | H3A 2B4 | Canada |
| Research Site | Brno | 65691 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Brno | 66491 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Hradec Králové | 50005 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Jihlava | 58601 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Pardubice | 53203 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Prague | 12808 | Czechia |
| Research Site | Strasbourg | Bas Rhin | 67098 | France |
| Research Site | Nîmes | Gard | 30029 | France |
| Research Site | Bordeaux | Gironde | 33076 | France |
| Research Site | Toulouse | Haute Garonne | 31059 | France |
| Research Site | Montpellier | Herault | 34295 | France |
| Research Site | Nantes | Loire Atlantique | 44093 | France |
| Research Site | Lille | Nord | 59000 | France |
| Research Site | Clermont-Ferrand | Puy De Dome | 63003 | France |
| Research Site | Bron | Rhone | 69500 | France |
| Research Site | Amiens | Somme | 80054 | France |
| Research Site | Paris | 75013 | France |
| Research Site | Freiburg im Breisgau | Baden-Wurttemberg | 79106 | Germany |
| Research Site | Tübingen | Baden-Wurttemberg | 72076 | Germany |
| Research Site | Ulm | Baden-Wurttemberg | 89081 | Germany |
| Research Site | Munich | Bavaria | 81675 | Germany |
| Research Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44791 | Germany |
| Research Site | Düsseldorf | North Rhine-Westphalia | 40225 | Germany |
| Research Site | Trier | Rhineland-Palatinate | 54292 | Germany |
| Research Site | Dresden | Saxony | 1307 | Germany |
| Research Site | Berlin | 10117 | Germany |
| Research Site | Münster | 48149 | Germany |
| Research Site | Budapest | 1135 | Hungary |
| Research Site | Budapest | 1145 | Hungary |
| Research Site | Budapest | H-1204 | Hungary |
| Research Site | Esztergom | 2500 | Hungary |
| Research Site | Kistarcsa | 2143 | Hungary |
| Research Site | Pécs | 7623 | Hungary |
| Research Site | Ramat Gan | 5262000 | Israel |
| Research Site | Montichiari | Brescia | 25018 | Italy |
| Research Site | Pozzilli | Isernia | 86077 | Italy |
| Research Site | Cefalù | Palermo | 90015 | Italy |
| Research Site | Genova | 16132 | Italy |
| Research Site | Messina | 98124 | Italy |
| Research Site | Milan | 20132 | Italy |
| Research Site | Milan | 20133 | Italy |
| Research Site | Naples | 80055 | Italy |
| Research Site | Naples | 80131 | Italy |
| Research Site | Naples | 80138 | Italy |
| Research Site | Pisa | 56126 | Italy |
| Research Site | Roma | 185 | Italy |
| Research Site | Verona | 37134 | Italy |
| Research Site | Geleen | 6162 AP | Netherlands |
| Research Site | Bydgoszcz | 85-795 | Poland |
| Research Site | Gdansk | 80-803 | Poland |
| Research Site | Katowice | 40-571 | Poland |
| Research Site | Katowice | 40-650 | Poland |
| Research Site | Krakow | 31-637 | Poland |
| Research Site | Lodz | 90-324 | Poland |
| Research Site | Lublin | 20-954 | Poland |
| Research Site | Szczecin | 70-111 | Poland |
| Research Site | Warsaw | 04-749 | Poland |
| Research Site | Zabrze | 41-800 | Poland |
| Research Site | Salt | Girona | 17190 | Spain |
| Research Site | Majadahonda | Madrid | 28222 | Spain |
| Research Site | Barakaldo | Vizcaya | 48903 | Spain |
| Research Site | Barcelona | 08907 | Spain |
| Research Site | Barcelona | 8035 | Spain |
| Research Site | Barcelona | 8036 | Spain |
| Research Site | Córdoba | 14004 | Spain |
| Research Site | Madrid | 28006 | Spain |
| Research Site | Seville | 41009 | Spain |
| Research Site | Aarau | 5001 | Switzerland |
| Research Site | Basel | 4031 | Switzerland |
| Research Site | Bern | 3010 | Switzerland |
| Research Site | Lugano | 6903 | Switzerland |
| Research Site | Zurich | 8091 | Switzerland |
| Research Site | Exeter | Devon | EX2 5DW | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Plymouth | Devon | PL6 8DH | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | London | Greater London | SE5 9RS | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | London | Greater London | W6 8RF | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Salford | Greater Manchester | M6 8HD | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Liverpool | Merseyside | L9 7LJ | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Nottingham | Nottinghamshire | NG7 2UH | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Oxford | Oxfordshire | OX3 9DU | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Glasgow | Strathclyde | G51 4TF | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Newcastle upon Tyne | Tyne & Wear | NE1 4LP | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Leeds | West Yorkshire | LS1 3EX | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Brighton | BN2 5BE | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Sheffield | S10 2JF | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Swansea | SA6 6NL | United Kingdom |
| Derived |
| Elliott C, Rudko DA, Arnold DL, Fetco D, Elkady AM, Araujo D, Zhu B, Gafson A, Tian Z, Belachew S, Bradley DP, Fisher E. Lesion-level correspondence and longitudinal properties of paramagnetic rim and slowly expanding lesions in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2023 May;29(6):680-690. doi: 10.1177/13524585231162262. Epub 2023 Apr 10. |
| 31928294 | Derived | Hanf KJM, Arndt JW, Liu Y, Gong BJ, Rushe M, Sopko R, Massol R, Smith B, Gao Y, Dalkilic-Liddle I, Lee X, Mojta S, Shao Z, Mi S, Pepinsky RB. Functional activity of anti-LINGO-1 antibody opicinumab requires target engagement at a secondary binding site. MAbs. 2020 Jan-Dec;12(1):1713648. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2020.1713648. |
Participants with RMS received BIIB033 750 milligrams (mg) IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks.
| FG002 | Part 2: Placebo to BIIB033 750 mg | Participants who received placebo and completed Part 1 were enrolled into Part 2 to receive BIIB033 750 mg IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks for up to a maximum of 80 weeks. |
| FG003 | Part 2: BIIB033 750 mg | Participants who received BIIB033 and completed Part 1 were enrolled into Part 2 to receive BIIB033 750 mg IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks for up to a maximum of 77 weeks. |
| Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population |
|
| Safety Population |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Part 2 (Week 73 to Week 168) |
|
|
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their treatment assignment regardless of actual treatment received.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Part 1: Placebo | Participants with RMS received placebo IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks. |
| BG001 | Part 1: BIIB033 750 mg | Participants with RMS received BIIB033 750 mg IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Part 1: Overall Response Score | Overall Response Score is a multicomponent score based on 4 components: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test in the dominant hand (9HPT-D), and 9HPT in the nondominant hand (9HPT-ND). Overall Score was sum of 4 components at each visit and ranges from +4 (improvement) to -4 (worsening). At each visit, each component is given a score relative to baseline (BL): -1 if threshold is met for worsening, 0 if no changes meet threshold criteria, or +1 if threshold is met for improvement. For T25FW and 9HPT improvement is ≥15% decrease in time from BL and worsening is ≥15% increase in time from BL. For EDSS, improvement is: ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0, and worsening is defined as a ≥1-point increase from a BL score of ≤5.5 or a ≥0.5-point increase from a BL score equal to 6.0. Positive Overall Response Score indicated that there was improvement in more components than there was worsening. | ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their treatment assignment regardless of actual treatment received. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Part 2: Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, life-threatening event, requires inpatient hospitalization, significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly. | Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed based on the actual treatment allocation. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Part 2: Baseline to Week 169 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement. | ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their treatment assignment regardless of actual treatment received. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or 3-Second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3) | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS (scale range: 0-10), higher scores=more disability and improvement defined as ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from BL score ≤6.0. T25FW is quantitative mobility and leg function performance test, where timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time=slower walking. 9HPT is quantitative test of upper extremity function, measures time to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove pegs. Longer time=poorer upper limb function. PASAT assesses auditory information processing speed. In 3-second PASAT, numbers are presented at a rate of 1 every 3 seconds with scores (range 0-120), higher scores=better working memory. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL is improvement. For PASAT ≥15% increase from BL is improvement. | ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their treatment assignment regardless of actual treatment received. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and Without Confirmed Worsening in Any of the 4 Assessments During the 72 Weeks of the Study | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0, and worsening is defined as a ≥1-point increase from a BL score of ≤5.5 or a ≥0.5-point increase from a BL score equal to 6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement and ≥15% increase in time from BL indicates worsening. | ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their treatment assignment regardless of actual treatment received. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale (range 0-10), higher scores=more disability. For EDSS, improvement is: a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time=slower walking. 9HPT is quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove pegs. Longer time=poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement. The SDMT measures time to pair abstract geometric symbols with specific numbers. The score is the number of correctly coded items (range 0-110) in 90 seconds, higher scores=better outcome. Improvement is: ≥4-point increase from BL. | ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their treatment assignment regardless of actual treatment received. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 1: Percentage of Participants With 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% Thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT) | EDSS measures disability status over time in MS on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a BL score of ≤6.0. T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet that is averaged between two completed trials. Longer time indicates slower walking. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. Longer time indicates poorer upper limb function. For T25FW and 9HPT ≥15% decrease in time from BL indicates improvement. | ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed according to their treatment assignment regardless of actual treatment received. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Part 1: Baseline to Week 72 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Overall Response Score | Part 1 of Study 215MS202 failed to meet its primary endpoint of ORS over 72 weeks. Trial also failed to show efficacy in its secondary endpoints. Thus, Sponsor decided to terminate Part 2 of study early, and no participants had the opportunity to complete Part 2 of the study. No data was collected as per the protocol prespecified Part 2 efficacy analyses to assess the long-term efficacy of BIIB033 in Part 2. | Posted | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND | Part 1 of Study 215MS202 failed to meet its primary endpoint of ORS over 72 weeks. Trial also failed to show efficacy in its secondary endpoints. Thus, Sponsor decided to terminate Part 2 of study early, and no participants had the opportunity to complete Part 2 of the study. No data was collected as per the protocol prespecified Part 2 efficacy analyses to assess the long-term efficacy of BIIB033 in Part 2. | Posted | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or PASAT-3 | Part 1 of Study 215MS202 failed to meet its primary endpoint of ORS over 72 weeks. Trial also failed to show efficacy in its secondary endpoints. Thus, Sponsor decided to terminate Part 2 of study early, and no participants had the opportunity to complete Part 2 of the study. No data was collected as per the protocol prespecified Part 2 efficacy analyses to assess the long-term efficacy of BIIB033 in Part 2. | Posted | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and Without Confirmed Worsening in Any of the 4 Assessments During the 96 Weeks of the Study | Part 1 of Study 215MS202 failed to meet its primary endpoint of ORS over 72 weeks. Trial also failed to show efficacy in its secondary endpoints. Thus, Sponsor decided to terminate Part 2 of study early, and no participants had the opportunity to complete Part 2 of the study. No data was collected as per the protocol prespecified Part 2 efficacy analyses to assess the long-term efficacy of BIIB033 in Part 2. | Posted | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and SDMT | Part 1 of Study 215MS202 failed to meet its primary endpoint of ORS over 72 weeks. Trial also failed to show efficacy in its secondary endpoints. Thus, Sponsor decided to terminate Part 2 of study early, and no participants had the opportunity to complete Part 2 of the study. No data was collected as per the protocol prespecified Part 2 efficacy analyses to assess the long-term efficacy of BIIB033 in Part 2. | Posted | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at Least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% Thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT) | Part 1 of Study 215MS202 failed to meet its primary endpoint of ORS over 72 weeks. Trial also failed to show efficacy in its secondary endpoints. Thus, Sponsor decided to terminate Part 2 of study early, and no participants had the opportunity to complete Part 2 of the study. No data was collected as per the protocol prespecified Part 2 efficacy analyses to assess the long-term efficacy of BIIB033 in Part 2. | Posted | Part 2: Baseline to Week 108 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values | Laboratory assessments including hematology and blood chemistry were evaluated for safety. Criteria for abnormality: In 10^9/liter (L) [white blood cells <3.0/>16, neutrophils <1.5/ >13.5, lymphocytes <0.8/ >12, monocytes >2.5, eosinophils >1.6, basophils >1.6, platelets <=75/ >=700], hemoglobin <=95 [female (F)] or <=115 [male (M)] or >=175 (F) or >=190 (M) gram per liter (g/L), hematocrit <=32 (F) or <=37 (M) or >=54 (F) or >=60 (M) percentage (%), red blood cells <=3.5/ >=6.4 10^12/L, in millimoles per liter (mmol/L) [sodium <=126/ >=156, potassium <=3/ >=6, chloride <=90/ >=118, bicarbonate <=16/ >=35, calcium <=2/ >=3, phosphorous <=0.5491/ >=1.7119, glucose (non-fasting) <=2.2/>=13.75], AST/SGOT >=3x upper limit of normal (ULN), ALT/SGPT >=3xULN, alkaline phosphatase >=3xULN, creatinine >=1.5xULN, total bilirubin >=1.5xULN, total protein <=45/ >=100 g/L, albumin <=25 g/L, uric acid >=501.5 (F)/>=619.5 (M) micromole (umol)/L | Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed based on the actual treatment allocation. 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values | The ECG result was classified as "normal", "abnormal", "abnormal, not adverse event", or "abnormal, adverse event". Shift to 'abnormal, not adverse event' included shift from normal or unknown to 'abnormal, not adverse event'. Shift to 'abnormal, adverse event' included shift from normal or unknown to 'abnormal, adverse event'. | Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed based on the actual treatment allocation. 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed at the specified timepoint for this outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values | Vital sign measurements including temperature, pulse rate (supine), systolic blood pressure (BP) and diastolic (supine) BP were evaluated for safety. Criteria for abnormalities: Temperature: >38 degree celsius (â—¦C) or >=1 â—¦C increase from baseline (BL); Pulse: [>100 beats per minute (bpm) or increase from BL of >30 bpm] or (<40 bpm or decrease from BL of >20 bpm); Systolic BP: [>160 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)/increase from BL of >40 mmHg] or (<90 mmHg/decrease from BL of >30 mmHg); Diastolic BP: (>100 mmHg/increase from BL of >30 mmHg) or (<45 mmHg/decrease from BL of >20 mmHg). | Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed based on the actual treatment allocation. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Weight Values | Criteria for abnormality was defined as a >7% increase or decrease in weight at the specified time point. | Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed based on the actual treatment allocation. 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed at the specified timepoint for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Part 2: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Part 2: Number of Participants With Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score at Any Post-Baseline Visit | C-SSRS systematically assess suicidal ideation and behavior rating scale. It rates an individual's degree of suicidal ideation on a scale, ranging from "wish to be dead" to "active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent and behaviors". The scale identifies specific behaviors ranging from "preparatory acts or behavior" to "suicide" which may be indicative of an individual's intent to complete suicide. | Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed based on the actual treatment allocation. 'Number Analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 |
|
Part 1: From first dose through 12 weeks after administration of the last dose of study treatment (Up to Week 84); Part 2: From first dose through 12 weeks after administration of the last dose of study treatment (Up to Week 169)
Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Participants were analyzed based on the actual treatment allocation.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Part 1: Placebo | Participants with RMS received placebo IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks. | 0 | 131 | 6 | 131 | 91 | 131 |
| EG001 | Part 1: BIIB033 750 mg | Participants with RMS received BIIB033 750 mg IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks. | 1 | 132 | 9 | 132 | 93 | 132 |
| EG002 | Part 2: Placebo to BIIB033 750 mg | Participants who received placebo and completed Part 1 were enrolled into Part 2 to receive BIIB033 750 mg IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks for up to a maximum of 80 weeks. | 0 | 100 | 9 | 100 | 34 | 100 |
| EG003 | Part 2: BIIB033 750 mg | Participants who received BIIB033 and completed Part 1 were enrolled into Part 2 to receive BIIB033 750 mg IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks for up to a maximum of 77 weeks. | 0 | 113 | 2 | 113 | 46 | 113 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Congenital anomaly | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coeliac artery compression syndrome | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pelvic abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ankle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Road traffic accident | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cervical spinal stenosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal adenocarcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Multiple sclerosis relapse | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uhthoff's phenomenon | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alcohol use disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Adenomyosis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endometriosis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Escherichia urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Systemic infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femur fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ligament rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia stage 1 | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung neoplasm malignant | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Parathyroid tumour benign | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meningocele acquired | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abortion spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Major depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight increased | Investigations | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Multiple sclerosis relapse | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 23.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The top-line results from the Part 1 did not meet the pre-specified primary endpoint nor the key secondary endpoints. The decision to discontinue study 215MS202 Part 2 was not based on safety concerns.
Our agreement is subject to confidentiality but generally the PI can publish, for non-commercial purposes only, results and methods of the trial, but no other Sponsor Confidential Information. PI must give Sponsor no less than 60 days to review any manuscript for a proposed publication and must delay publication for up to an additional 90 days thereafter if Sponsor needs to file any patent application to protect any of Sponsor's intellectual property contained in the proposed publication.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US Biogen Clinical Trial Center | Biogen | 866-633-4636 | clinicaltrials@biogen.com |
| Prot_002.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 31, 2020 | Mar 31, 2022 | SAP_003.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009103 | Multiple Sclerosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020278 | Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS |
| D020274 | Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D003711 | Demyelinating Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000625770 | opicinumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Consent Withdrawn |
|
| Investigator Decision |
|
| Pregnancy |
|
| Other |
|
| Participants Not Dosed |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants with RMS received BIIB033 750 mg IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks.
|
|
|
Participants with RMS received BIIB033 750 mg IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks. |
|
|
|
Participants with RMS received BIIB033 750 mg IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| OG001 | Part 2: BIIB033 750 mg | Participants who received BIIB033 and completed Part 1 were enrolled into Part 2 to receive BIIB033 750 mg IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks for up to a maximum of 77 weeks. |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|