Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Rio de Janeiro State Research Supporting Foundation (FAPERJ) | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
There is evidence, of a single randomized controlled trial, that CFT is better than combined manual therapy and motor control exercise for chronic low back pain. However, this study had significant methodological shortcomings regarding the failure to carry out the intention to treat analysis and a considerable loss of follow-up of patients. It is important to replicate this study through a randomized clinical trial with similar objectives in another domain, but correcting these methodological shortcomings. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of Cognitive Functional Therapy in patients with chronic non specific low back pain.
One hundred and forty eight patients with chronic low back pain from two outpatient physiotherapy clinics in Brazil will be randomized to receive either Cognitive Functional Therapy or combined Manual Therapy and Motor Control Exercises. Intervention: 4-10 sessions of CFT. Control: 4-10 sessions of combined Manual Therapy and Motor Control Exercises. Measurements: Clinical outcomes will be assessed at the baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after randomization. Analysis: Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed, and linear mixed models will be calculated to evaluate the effect of the intervention. Non-specific predictors, moderators and mediators of outcome will also be analysed. Discussion: This study will investigate whether the results of the first CFT clinical trial can be replicated. In addition, the results will contribute to a better understanding of the efficacy of the CFT approach.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Functional Therapy | Experimental | Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) is a behavioral intervention that addresses multiple aspects of low back pain. This approach focuses on changing the patient's beliefs, confronting their fears, educating them about pain mechanisms, increasing mental strength, and control of their body. This is done with functional tasks performed by individuals training them to reduce excessive muscle activity in the trunk and generate behavioral changes related to pain, from postures and provocative movements. |
|
| Manual Therapy and Exercise | Active Comparator | The active comparator will be the combination of manual therapy and motor control exercises. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Functional Therapy | Behavioral | There will be four main components in the intervention, following the protocol used by O'Keefe et al. (2015):
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain intensity | It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END). The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days | 3 months after randomization |
| Disability associated to low back pain | It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %. | 3 months after randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Global impression of recovery | It will be evaluated based on the Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) which is an 11-point scale ranging from -5 ('vastly worse'), through 0 (no change) to +5 (completely recovered). | 3, 6 and 12 months after randomization |
| Pain intensity |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Anxiety (mediator of outcome) | It will be evaluated by the question "Do you feel anxious?"with the response options ranging from "Not at all" = 0 to "Quite anxious" = 10 | 3 and 6 months after randomization |
| Social isolation (mediator of outcome) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ney Meziat-Filho, PhD | Centro Universitário Augusto Motta, UNISUAM | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centro Universitário Augusto Motta | Rio de Janeiro | 21.041-020 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27745712 | Background | Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11. | |
| 21821612 | Background | O'Sullivan P. It's time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;46(4):224-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081638. Epub 2011 Aug 4. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D020879 | Neuromuscular Manifestations |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D026201 | Musculoskeletal Manipulations |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000529 | Complementary Therapies |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor, blinded participants and intention to treat analysis. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, immediately after the end of the intervention (12 weeks), as in 6 and 12 months after randomization, to assess the maintenance of any effect of treatment. The patients in the CFT group will be treated by two physical therapists that attended twice the CFT workshops with two of the tutors of the method. They completed 106 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study with the supervision of a physical therapist with more than three years of clinical experience in CFT. Patients in MT-EX group will be treated by two physical therapists with more than 8 years of clinical experience in manual therapy and motor control exercises.
Not provided
Not provided
Clinical outcomes will be obtained in the evaluations carried out by a blinded assessor 3, 6 and 12 months after randomization. Both arms include active treatments, and participants will not know whether they are in the experimental group or control group.
|
| Manual Therapy and Motor Control Exercise | Other | According to the pragmatic clinical decision of the physiotherapist responsible for this intervention arm, participants allocated to the comparison group will be treated with joint mobilization or manipulation techniques applied to the lower back or pelvis. The active exercises will involve isolated contractions of the deep abdominal and multifidus muscles in different functional positions. Most patients in this group will receive exercises to perform at home. This will include general exercise or motor control exercise, but not related to CFT. |
|
It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END) 13. The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days. |
| 6 and 12 months after randomization |
| Disability associated to low back pain | It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %. | 6 and 12 months after randomization |
| Patient Satisfaction | This is a simple questionnaire from 1 to 5 asking the patients how satisfied they were with their treatment: 1 = satisfied, 2 = just a little satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = just a little dissatisfied, 5 = dissatisfied | 3, 6 and 12 months after randomization |
It will be evaluated by the question"Do you feel socially isolated?"with the response options ranging from "Not at all isolated" = 0 to "Quite isolated" = 10
| 3 and 6 months after randomization |
| Catastrophization (mediator of outcome) | It will be evaluated by the question "When I feel pain, it's terrible and I feel it's never going to get any better."with the response options ranging from "Never do that" = 0 to "Always do that" = 10. | 3 and 6 months after randomization |
| Depression (mediator of outcome) | It will be evaluated by the question "During the past month have you often been bothered by feeling down, depressed or hopeless?" with the response options ranging from "Never" = 0 to "All the time" = 10. | 3 and 6 months after randomization |
| Fear of movement (mediator of outcome) | It will be assessed by the question "Physical activity might harm my back" and the response options will range from 0 ("completely disagree") to 10 ("completely agree). | 3 and 6 months after randomization |
| Stress (mediator of outcome) | It will be evaluated by the question "Do you feel stressed? and the response options will range from 0 ("completely disagree") to 10 ("completely agree) | 3 and 6 months after randomization |
| Sleep (mediator of outcome) | It will be evaluated by the question "Did you have sleep problems last month?" based on Subjective Health Complaints Inventory19. The response options will be "Not at all"=0, "A little"=1, "Some"=2, and "Serious"=3 | 3 and 6 months after randomization |
| 27002443 | Background | Goyal M, Haythornthwaite JA. Is It Time to Make Mind-Body Approaches Available for Chronic Low Back Pain? JAMA. 2016 Mar 22-29;315(12):1236-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2437. No abstract available. |
| 24480940 | Background | Menke JM. Do manual therapies help low back pain? A comparative effectiveness meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 1;39(7):E463-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000230. |
| 23091394 | Background | Sveinsdottir V, Eriksen HR, Reme SE. Assessing the role of cognitive behavioral therapy in the management of chronic nonspecific back pain. J Pain Res. 2012;5:371-80. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S25330. Epub 2012 Oct 11. |
| 26742533 | Background | Saragiotto BT, Maher CG, Yamato TP, Costa LO, Menezes Costa LC, Ostelo RW, Macedo LG. Motor control exercise for chronic non-specific low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 8;2016(1):CD012004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012004. |
| 26033941 | Background | O'Keeffe M, Purtill H, Kennedy N, O'Sullivan P, Dankaerts W, Tighe A, Allworthy L, Dolan L, Bargary N, O'Sullivan K. Individualised cognitive functional therapy compared with a combined exercise and pain education class for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 1;5(6):e007156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007156. |
| 23208945 | Background | Vibe Fersum K, O'Sullivan P, Skouen JS, Smith A, Kvale A. Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2013 Jul;17(6):916-28. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00252.x. Epub 2012 Dec 4. |
| 25920336 | Background | Meziat Filho N. Changing beliefs for changing movement and pain: Classification-based cognitive functional therapy (CB-CFT) for chronic non-specific low back pain. Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:303-6. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.04.013. Epub 2015 Apr 16. |
| 27052627 | Background | Meziat Filho N, Mendonca R, Nogueira LA. Lack of confidence in the lower limb: Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) for a unilateral loading impairment in chronic non-specific low back pain. Case report. Man Ther. 2016 Sep;25:104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 12. |
| 24281277 | Background | Kent P, Mirkhil S, Keating J, Buchbinder R, Manniche C, Albert HB. The concurrent validity of brief screening questions for anxiety, depression, social isolation, catastrophization, and fear of movement in people with low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2014 Jun;30(6):479-89. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000010. |
| 24665116 | Background | Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, Williams G, Smith E, Vos T, Barendregt J, Murray C, Burstein R, Buchbinder R. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24. |