Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to compare tracheal ultrasound with direct visualization of tracheal rings for the confirmation of endotracheal tube placement in intubated patients. We hypothesize that this method is more reliable, cheap, and readily available for all emergency physicians.
Confirmation of the ETT placement has utmost importance in the management of airway in emergency medicine (EM). Visual examination of the tube (fogging), auscultation, chest x-ray, capnography, capnometry and fiberoptic bronchoscopy are the main tools used for confirmation with increasing diagnostic utilities. Recently, tracheal ultrasonography (US) was introduced as a reliable, cheap and readily available method of confirmation of ETT placement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tracheal ultrasonography | Device | Tracheal ultrasonography |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of endotracheal tube in trachea | Whether the endotracheal tube is in the trachea or not | Immediately after the intubation process |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients eligible for the inclusion were consecutive adults (>=18 years) intubated in the ED during the shifts of the researchers (TM, OFC). We excluded patients if they have anatomical, traumatic or tumoral defect(s) at the site of sonographic imaging.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Haldun Akoglu, MD | Marmara University | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided