Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background: Endometriosis affects 10% of reproductive aged females, and can have a negative impact on sexual quality of life. Endometriosis can cause pelvic pain with deep penetration during intercourse, as well as other sexual and non-sexual pains. This study will allow us to determine if an increase in sexual pain is related to central sensitization.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is an association between the severity of sexual pain and central sensitization in women with endometriosis.
Measurement tools: Data will be collected from the Clinic's Data Registry, an online questionnaire, a quantitative sensory test (QST) to measure pain-pressure threshold (PPT) as a marker of central sensitization, and daily entry to an online survey.
Primary Hypothesis: Central sensitization (measured by lower pain-pressure threshold) will be associated with an increased severity of deep dyspareunia, as well as a tenderness of the bladder/pelvic floor and depression, in women with endometriosis.
Background:
Endometriosis results from the presence of endometrial cells growing abnormally outside the uterus and affects approximately 10% of reproductive-aged females. Endometriosis can be associated with various types of pain such as: dysmenorrhea (painful cramps with menses), deep dyspareunia (pelvic pain with deep penetration during intercourse), dyschezia (painful bowel movements) and chronic pelvic pain. Few studies have explored the association between endometriosis and deep dyspareunia resulting in a limited understanding of how to treat deep dyspareunia. Deep dyspareunia is defined as pelvic pain with deep penetration and occurs in 50% of women with endometriosis at some time in their sexual lives. Deep dyspareunia has been shown to lower or cease intercourse, thus lowering self-esteem and resulting in negative effects on sexual functioning and interpersonal relationships.
A potential contributor to deep dyspareunia in women with endometriosis that is largely under-researched is the concept of central sensitization. Central sensitization is an amplification of nociceptive signaling that may result from prolonged pain causing sensitization of the dorsal horn neurons, which results in hyperalgesia (increased response to pain) and allodynia (response to pain when there normally would not be). A recent study, comparing cross-sectional data from suspected or surgically diagnosed endometriosis patients, suggested that bladder and pelvic floor tenderness may be markers of central sensitization. However, the linkage between the indirect markers of central sensitization and the presence of central sensitization requires confirmation. This link can be assessed through validated quantitative sensory testing (QST). Likewise, the association between central sensitization and deep dyspareunia may also be confirmed through QST. QST is an objective measurement tool to determine the presence and/or degree of sensory disturbances, by detecting the alterations in nociceptive pathways. For example, a low pain-pressure threshold (i.e., increased pain sensation) at healthy unaffected areas, as measured by QST, indicates central sensitization.
Purpose: To determine if deep dyspareunia is associated with central sensitization in women with endometriosis.
Research Question: Is deep dyspareunia associated with central sensitization assessed by decreased pain-pressure threshold?
Objectives:
Primary Objective:
Secondary Objectives:
Examine the association between central sensitization and severity of non-sexual pains and Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30) scores.
Examine the association between central sensitization and tenderness of the bladder and pelvic floor (determined by physician on physical exam).
Examine the association between central sensitization and psychological measures (assessed by validated questionnaires).
Research Hypotheses:
Primary Hypothesis: Central sensitization (measured by pain-pressure threshold) is associated with an increased severity of deep dyspareunia, as well as a tenderness of the bladder/pelvic floor and depression, in women with endometriosis.
Secondary Hypothesis: Women with endometriosis will have greater central sensitization (indicated by a lower pain-pressure threshold) than women without endometriosis.
Setting: The Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis program at the BC Women's Health Centre uses an interdisciplinary approach to managing pain, including: physiotherapy for bladder and pelvic floor, surgical intervention, pain education and medical management. This program addresses multiple factors influencing pain through multiple approaches, as opposed to the traditional approach of surgical removal of the endometriosis to resolve the pain alone.
Design: This study is a longitudinal, prospective cohort study, involving cases and controls.
Primary Outcome: Severity of deep dyspareunia (0-10 numeric rating scale)
Secondary Outcomes: Severity of superficial dyspareunia, severity of non-sexual pains, and psychological questionnaire scores
Main Independent Variables: Central sensitization measured by pain-pressure threshold (PPT) determined through QST
Study Population: The case population includes women who have consented to the Data Registry (H16-00264) and who are newly or re-referred to the BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis, and who have regardless of the severity of deep dyspareunia, either: 1) previous surgical diagnosis of endometriosis or 2) current ovarian endometrioma cyst or 3) current endometriosis nodule.
Sample Size: 30 cases and 15 controls.
Recruitment and Data Collection prior to Test date:
Cases:
• At the end of their appointment with one of the endometriosis specialists at the BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis, the physician will ask the patient if they are interested in learning more about this research study (if the physician deems them acceptable to be included based on screening of inclusion and exclusion criteria), and if so, will tell them a research assistant may call them.
• A poster introducing the study will also be available in the clinic waiting rooms.
• During a phone conversation, research team will remind the potential case participant that they have consented to the data registry, and consent to this study allows us access to analyze their data registry data. Verbal consent will be given if the potential case participant would like to participate, and a test appointment will be booked.
• Case participants will sign the consent form in-person at the beginning of the test day appointment.
Control:
• Recruitment of the control group will be done by poster advertisement, as well as an in-person information session at the BC Women's Hospital. If they are interested in the study, potential participants will be asked to contact the research team to learn more about the study.
• Research team will provide the potential control participant with a copy of the consent form (in person or by email). Each potential control participant will be advised to carefully read the consent form, and to contact the research team with any questions about the information contained in the consent form.
• If the control participant expresses interest in the study after reading the consent form, a link to access the screening questions will be sent to them.
• Criteria will be assessed by screening questions. If the participants are eligible based on the screening questions then they will be asked if they would like to consent to the study (online consent). This online consent allows access to the data from the screening questions. If they are not eligible, or do not consent to the study their screening questions will not be analyzed. If the control participant consents online they will be asked to complete additional questions (height, etc.).
• Research team will receive an email once the control participant has consented online, and will contact the participant to book an appointment.
• On the test day, the consent participants will sign the same consent form in-person to consent to the testing procedures.
Procedures for Data Collection (on Test day)
Questionnaire:
Case and Control:
• An online questionnaire will collect data such as: score of sexual and non-sexual pains, first day of last menstrual period,etc. The pelvic pain questions asked on this online questionnaire are modified from the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form. This questionnaire will be filled out online during the test appointment.
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST):
Case and Control:
Feedback Questionnaire:
Case and Controls:
• After the participant's PPT has been measured, they will be given an anonymous feedback form to assess the procedure mechanisms and specifications, as well as comfort level before, during and after testing. This will allow investigators to adjust any necessary procedure details to create a more comfortable environment/test for future participants.
Procedures for Data Collection (after Test day)
Online Survey:
Cases only:
Participants without email addresses will have the opportunity to complete the surveys on a printed out copy (given to them on the appointment day) and mail/bring in-person to the Centre at the end of the 6 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case |
|
| |
| Control |
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Intervention | Other | There is no treatment intervention. We are assigning measurement tools such as the Electronic Thimble Algometer for QST and questionnaires to both groups. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Dyspareunia Score | Self reported response to the question: "In the last 24 hours, how painful was deep penetration during sexual intercourse?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (Not applicable (no intercourse), 0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the deep dyspareunia scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated. | Case only: daily for 6 weeks after QST testing date |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Superficial Dyspareunia Score | Self reported response to the question: "In the last 24 hours, how painful was initial penetration (entry) during sexual intercourse?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (Not applicable (no intercourse), 0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the superficial dyspareunia scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Case:
Control:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Case and Control:
Not provided
Not provided
Tertiary care centre (BC Women's Health Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis) for case participants.
Community sample for control participants.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Yong, MD/PhD | BC Children's and Women's Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC Children's and Women's Hospital | Vancouver | British Columbia | V6H2N9 | Canada |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Case participants: People with endometriosis from a tertiary endometriosis care center were approached after their baseline visit with their gynecologist and recruited for the study.
Control participants: People with no suspected/diagnosed endometriosis and no pelvic pain scores above 4/10 were recruited from poster advertisements, in-person information sessions, and institutional research newsletters at the BC Women's Hospital.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Case |
|
| FG001 | Control |
|
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Case |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Age in years |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Deep Dyspareunia Score | Self reported response to the question: "In the last 24 hours, how painful was deep penetration during sexual intercourse?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (Not applicable (no intercourse), 0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the deep dyspareunia scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated. | 36 case participants total in the study. 6 participants did not attempt intercourse during the 6-week study period. 30 participants had dyspareunia data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Case only: daily for 6 weeks after QST testing date |
|
During test day (QST) appointment
No intervention. This was an observational study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Case |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Yong | BC Women's Hospital and University of British Columbia | 604-875-2534 | paul.yong@vch.ca |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 25, 2018 | Feb 17, 2026 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004715 | Endometriosis |
| D004414 | Dyspareunia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Case only: daily for 6 weeks after QST testing date |
| Chronic Pelvic Pain Score | Self reported response to the question: "What was your average level of pelvic pain in the last 24 hours?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the chronic pelvic pain scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated. | Case only: daily for 6 weeks after QST testing date |
| BG001 | Control |
|
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Standard Deviation |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Sex | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Race | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Pain-pressure threshold | Extra-pelvic PPT was measured by the Electronic Thimble Algometer on a continuous scale, in units of newtons (N), at each anatomic site (deltoid and first dorsal interosseous) on the test day. An average PPT was taken for each test site. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Newtons |
|
| Bladder and/or pelvic floor tenderness | Only for case participants (people with endometriosis). Uni-digit palpation at the anterior vaginal wall and levator ani bilaterally at 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock during the pelvic exam at the baseline gynecologist assessment. Bladder and/or pelvic floor tenderness was coded as a binary variable (present/absent), being present if at least one anatomic site (right pelvic floor, left pelvic floor, or bladder) was tender on uni-digit palpation. | Variable was collected for case participants only (people with endometriosis who are patients at the BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis). Control participants were not patients at the Centre and did not receive a pelvic exam to assess for this variable. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Superficial Dyspareunia Score | Self reported response to the question: "In the last 24 hours, how painful was initial penetration (entry) during sexual intercourse?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (Not applicable (no intercourse), 0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the superficial dyspareunia scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated. | 36 case participants total in the study. 6 participants did not attempt intercourse during the 6-week study period. 30 participants had dyspareunia data. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Case only: daily for 6 weeks after QST testing date |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Chronic Pelvic Pain Score | Self reported response to the question: "What was your average level of pelvic pain in the last 24 hours?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the chronic pelvic pain scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Case only: daily for 6 weeks after QST testing date |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 36 |
| 0 |
| 36 |
| 0 |
| 36 |
| EG001 | Control |
| 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D012735 | Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D020018 | Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |