Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to conduct an early clinical evaluation of the Relay Branch System, which will provide initial insight into the clinical safety and function of the device.
This Early Feasibility Study (EFS) will assess the safety and effectiveness of the device at the index procedure and at 30-day follow-up. The study will evaluate the delivery and deployment of the device, patency of branches and branch vessels, and exclusion of the aortic pathology. The data will help determine if modifications need to be made to the device, the procedural steps, operator technique, or the indications for use.
This Early Feasibility Study (EFS) protocol describes the clinical study requirements for the Relay Branch System; a device designed to provide an option for patients with arch and proximal descending chronic thoracic aortic pathologies. As an EFS, this investigation is intended to provide proof of principle and initial clinical safety data on the Relay Branch System. The study is planned as an initial investigation of the device for aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aortic aneurysmal disease, PAU (including IMH) and uncomplicated chronic Type B aortic dissection (including IMH). The study will yield information on procedural techniques; assessing the safety and effectiveness of the device at the index procedure and at 30 days, focusing on device delivery and deployment, and circulatory exclusion of the pathologic process. As a branched device, patency of the endograft branches will also be assessed.
The study will evaluate three-dimensional (3D) imaging data, both at baseline and through follow-up. Baseline 3D anatomy will augment information on the precise anatomic configuration of patients presenting aortic arch pathology treatable with the device. Follow-up imaging will provide information on the effectiveness of the device with respect to endoleaks in patients with aneurysms, sealing of dissections, PAU and IMH, and stability of the device at the deployed position, response, endograft patency, and short-term device integrity.
The data from this EFS will yield insights into the following aspects of the device, preceding a traditional feasibility or pivotal study:
Observations from the study will guide the instructions for use (IFU) for the device. Finally, the study will collect imaging data to augment the current use conditions data set. It is anticipated that information collected will be used to make applicable design changes, or be combined with a prospective, investigational device exemption (IDE) study for submission of an original premarket approval application (PMA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval to commercially distribute the system.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relay Branch System | Experimental | Subjects who receive the Relay Branch System for repair which includes those with aneurysmal disease, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU), and chronic uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, aorta branch cardiovascular implant | Device | The Relay Branch System is intended to provide an option for patients with arch and proximal descending chronic thoracic aortic pathologies. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite of Major Adverse Events (MAEs) | The primary safety outcome determined by the rate of MAEs, including
| 30 days after the index procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite of the following Criteria |
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥18 years
Anatomy that would require coverage of the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT) and/or left carotid arteries if a non-branch endograft were implanted
At least one of the following:
a. Aneurysm of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, or proximal descending aorta that meets at least one of the following: i. ≥ 5.5 cm in diameter ii. ≥ 4.0 cm in diameter that has increased in size by 0.5 cm in the last 6 months iii. Measures twice the size of the normal aorta diameter iv. Is saccular in configuration
b. PAU within the ascending aorta, aortic arch, or proximal descending thoracic aorta (DTA) with or without intramural hematoma (IMH)
c. Chronic, uncomplicated aortic dissection distal to the BCT (type B), with either aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm or ≥4.0 cm with an increase in size by 0.5 cm in the last 6 months d. IMH distal to the BCT with recurrent symptoms, i.e. hypertension or intractable pain, despite best medical therapy.
A non-aneurysmal proximal aortic neck diameter ranging between 28 mm and 43 mm and a non-aneurysmal distal aortic neck diameter ranging between 19 mm and 43 mm.
A proximal attachment zone of the arch graft, meeting the oversizing requirement, must be a minimum of 25mm in length when measured on the inner curve of the ascending aorta, proximal to the BCT.
Total length from the coronaries to the proximal edge of the BCT must be a minimum of 70mm.
The length of the distal landing zone should be 20mm minimum.
Coverage of the left subclavian artery is permitted. Revascularization of the left subclavian artery may be considered in all cases by the treating physician and, especially, in anatomies where revascularization is determined to be clinically necessary
The distal landing zone must contain a straight segment (non-tapered, non-reverse tapered; defined by < 10% diameter change) with length equal to or greater than the required attachment length of the intended device
Non-aneurysmal BCT and left common carotid arteries with diameters ranging > 6.0mm across the entire length of the treatment zone.
Distal branch landing zone must be <20.0 mm in diameter and a minimum of 25.0 mm in length.
Adequate arterial access for introduction and delivery of the Relay Branch System. Note: Alternative methods to gain proper access can be utilized (e.g., iliac conduit)
Considered high risk or prohibitive risk for conventional surgery by treating physician or aortic team
Must be willing to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule
Subject or legally authorized representative must sign the informed consent form prior to implant.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Luis Sanchez, MD | Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington Univ | Principal Investigator |
| Wilson Szeto, MD | Penn Presbyterian Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Southern California | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States | ||
| University of Florida |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Relay Branch System is intended for treating thoracic aortic arch pathologies requiring coverage of the innominate and left common carotid arteries. The system includes a graft with a proximal landing zone in the proximal aorta and branch grafts that extend into the innominate and left common carotid arteries. The arch graft and branch grafts are composed of self-expanding nitinol stents sutured to polyester vascular graft fabric, creating an exoskeleton
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Technical success will be evaluated in 2 stages; the first evaluation occurs during the implant procedure. Technical success is then re-evaluated again 30 days post operation to ensure the graft placement was successful as outlined above |
| Gainesville |
| Florida |
| 32608 |
| United States |
| Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| University of Maryland | Baltimore | Maryland | 21201 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Barnes Jewish Hospital at Washington University | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| Duke University | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania/Penn Presbyterian | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Baylor Scott and White Research Institute | Plano | Texas | 75093 | United States |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017545 | Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic |
| D017542 | Aneurysm, Ruptured |
| D001014 | Aortic Aneurysm |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000783 | Aneurysm |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001018 | Aortic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016503 | Drug Delivery Systems |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided