Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The specific objective of this study is to validate the practice of remote pulmonary function testing (rPFT) conducted in the home through the use of connected mobile health devices and the Penn State Hershey ALS Telemanagement program.
The specific objective of this study is to validate the practice of remote pulmonary function testing (rPFT) conducted in the home through the use of connected mobile health devices and the Penn State Hershey ALS Telemanagement program. The central hypothesis is that guided home assessment of respiratory function is a valid method for detecting respiratory insufficiency leading to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) recommendation. This study has the potential to transform the current practice of conducting breathing assessments every three months, resulting in timelier detection of respiratory insufficiency, thereby staining quality of life and lengthening survival. This protocol has the potential to demonstrate telemanagement exceeding the standards of ALS care.
This is a self-controlled study which will enroll 40 patients from the ALS clinic. On the day of their clinical visit, study participants will perform both a standard PFT as well as a simulated rPFT, both generating three valid repetitions of forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) procedures. The simulated rPFT will mimic the practice of home telemonitoring by having patients be instructed by a respiratory therapist over the telemanagement portal while in a research room within the ALS clinic. The primary hypothesis is that there is no difference in the results of PFT and rPFT for respiratory assessment of FVC and MIP.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| remote PFT (rPFT) validation | Experimental | Subjects in this arm perform both standard and remote PFT assessments in order to validate the procedure. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| remote pulmonary function testing | Device | Telemedicine delivery of pulmonary function testing in ALS, including Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Standard PFT - Forced Vital Capacity | Respiratory therapist will administer three valid maneuvers of forced vital capacity (FVC) The best FVC value is the outcome. | One administration - 10 minutes |
| Standard PFT - Maximal Inspiratory Pressure | Respiratory therapist will administer three valid maneuvers of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). The best MIP value is the outcome. | One administration - 10 minutes |
| Remote PFT - Forced Vital Capacity | Respiratory therapist will use the telehealth interface to guide the patient and caregiver to self-administer three valid FVC maneuvers. The best FVC value is the outcome. | One administration - 10 minutes |
| Remote PFT - Maximal Inspiratory Pressure | Respiratory therapist will use the telehealth interface to guide the patient and caregiver to self-administer three valid MIP maneuvers. The best MIP value is the outcome. | One administration - 10 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient and Caregiver Reported Outcomes | Survey responses from the patient/caregiver pair. Likert-type scales are used to generate subscores pertaining to: General Acceptability, Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability, and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability. Subscales (evaluated separately): General Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)] Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best) Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)]](streamdown:incomplete-link) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients:
Caregivers:
Respiratory Therapist
Part 2 imposes additional inclusion criteria for patients only.
Patients:
4) Symptom onset within the last three years. 5) Have a computer and home internet service sufficient for engaging in telemedicine sessions.
6) Have a second device capable of downloading the spirometer application from an app store (Android- or iOS-based smartphone or tablet).
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients:
Caregivers: None
Respiratory Therapists: None
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hershey Medical Center ALS Clinic | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
No plan at this time to share data with other researchers
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
49 subjects (including 3 patients not completing procedures, 3 controls, and 3 therapists)
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Remote PFT (rPFT) Validation | Those in the first part of the study will perform both standard and remote PFT assessments in order to validate the procedure. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Only patients who completed validation procedures are included (40 total). Recruitment has not yet begun for the second, randomized phase of the protocol, which involves enrollment into the standard PFT and remote PFT strudy arms.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Remote PFT (rPFT) Validation | Subjects perform both standard and remote PFT assessments in order to validate the procedure. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Standard PFT - Forced Vital Capacity | Respiratory therapist will administer three valid maneuvers of forced vital capacity (FVC) The best FVC value is the outcome. | 40 patients taking part in validation study | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Predicted FVC | One administration - 10 minutes |
|
For the validation study, adverse event data was collected over the period of the procedures, approximately 20 minutes.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Remote PFT (rPFT) Validation | Those in the first part of the study will perform both standard and remote PFT assessments in order to validate the procedure. remote pulmonary function testing: Telemedicine delivery of pulmonary function testing in ALS, including Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) standard pulmonary function testing: Standard clinical delivery of pulmonary function testing in ALS, including Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew Geronimo | Penn State College of Medicine | 717-531-0003 | 282576 | geronimo@psu.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 25, 2018 | Jan 11, 2019 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Apr 17, 2018 | Jan 11, 2019 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
A self-controlled validation study of experimental remote PFT assessment vs standard of care (non-randomized)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| standard pulmonary function testing | Device | Standard clinical delivery of pulmonary function testing in ALS, including Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) |
|
| 10 minute survey administered following completion of standard and remote PFT of Part 1 |
| Therapist Reported Outcomes | Survey responses from the respiratory therapist. Likert-type scales are used to generate subscores pertaining to: General Acceptability, Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability, and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability. Subscales (evaluated separately): General Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)] Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best) Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)]](streamdown:incomplete-link) | 10 minute survey administered following completion of standard and remote PFT of Part 1 |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| ALS Functional Rating Scale - Revised (ALSFRS-R) | Scale that measures physical function in bulbar, fine motor, gross motor, and breathing domains. Total score ranges from 0-48. Higher numbers indicate normal function. Lower numbers indicate impaired function. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Time Since Symptom Onset | Mean | Standard Deviation | months |
|
| Diagnosis | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Standard PFT - Maximal Inspiratory Pressure | Respiratory therapist will administer three valid maneuvers of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). The best MIP value is the outcome. | 40 patients taking part in validation study | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm water | One administration - 10 minutes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Remote PFT - Forced Vital Capacity | Respiratory therapist will use the telehealth interface to guide the patient and caregiver to self-administer three valid FVC maneuvers. The best FVC value is the outcome. | 40 patients taking part in validation study | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent predicted of FVC | One administration - 10 minutes |
|
|
|
| Primary | Remote PFT - Maximal Inspiratory Pressure | Respiratory therapist will use the telehealth interface to guide the patient and caregiver to self-administer three valid MIP maneuvers. The best MIP value is the outcome. | 40 patients taking part in validation study | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm water | One administration - 10 minutes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient and Caregiver Reported Outcomes | Survey responses from the patient/caregiver pair. Likert-type scales are used to generate subscores pertaining to: General Acceptability, Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability, and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability. Subscales (evaluated separately): General Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)] Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best) Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)]](streamdown:incomplete-link) | One subject did not complete the survey | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 10 minute survey administered following completion of standard and remote PFT of Part 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Therapist Reported Outcomes | Survey responses from the respiratory therapist. Likert-type scales are used to generate subscores pertaining to: General Acceptability, Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability, and Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability. Subscales (evaluated separately): General Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)] Forced Vital Capacity Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best) Maximal Inspiratory Pressure Acceptability [0-5 (worst-best)]](streamdown:incomplete-link) | There were three therapists who produced 35 separate survey responses. Responses from 5 patient interactions were not available. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 10 minute survey administered following completion of standard and remote PFT of Part 1 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 40 |
| 0 |
| 40 |
| 0 |
| 40 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|