Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate how visual acuity assessed with Peek Acuity (a cell phone application to check visual acuity) among preschool and school-aged children 3 to less than18 years of age (1) compares to the standard visual acuity exam in the ophthalmology clinic and (2) performs as a screening test for ocular abnormalities that warrant referral for an eye exam.
Current recommendations suggest that children begin visual acuity screening as early as possible with most children capable at 3 years old though some may not be able to cooperate until 4 years of age. While visual acuity screening is standard in schools and pediatric clinics, the specificity of the exams has been questioned. A number of community screening exams rely on outdated and flawed methods that may not accurately access the vision of all children. Because many children who fail these vision screenings are referred to ophthalmology clinics without a true visual acuity deficit, a more accurate but accessible, cost effective, and feasible vision screening exam is necessary. One solution is a smart phone application designed to assess visual acuity, called Peek Acuity. The application is available for android operating system and can be downloaded as a free beta from the Google Play Store. A short tutorial walks users through the application. The application displays a single letter "E" in 4 positions, 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees (rolling "E") that does not require English comprehension. Patients are instructed to point in the direction of the arms of the "E." The examiner records the responses by swiping the screen in the direction the patient points. The application uses responses to calculate visual acuity and typical exams can be completed within 2 minutes.
In one study, Peek Acuity visual assessments have been shown to be comparable to that determined by the ophthalmology clinic in patients aged 55 years and older. This study also found that the Peek Acuity is efficient, with an average exam time of 77 seconds compared to 82 seconds using the standard Snellen eye chart.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peek Acuity Screening | Experimental | Cell phone application to be used for visual acuity screening. |
|
| Standard Visual Screening | Active Comparator | Standard visual acuity screening administered at Duke University Eye Center regarded as the gold standard. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peek Acuity | Other | Cell phone application for visual acuity screening |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity of screening with standard exam vs. Peek Acuity for referral to further medical management | Children screened positive for visual deficit by standard exam will be deemed true positives; any true positives not identified by the Peek Acuity application will be deemed false negatives. Sensitivity is calculated by true positive population divided by the sum of true positives and false negatives | Visit 1 (up to 30 minutes) |
| Specificity of screening with standard exam vs. Peek Acuity for referral to further medical management | Children screened negative for visual deficit by standard exam will be deemed true negatives; any true negatives not identified by the Peek Acuity application will be deemed false positives. Specificity is calculated by true negative population divided by the sum of true negatives and false positives | Visit 1 (up to 30 minutes) |
| Accuracy of screening with standard exam vs. Peek Acuity for referral to further medical management | Visual acuity score determined by Peek Acuity will be compared to the score from standard exam to determine accuracy where the score from standard exam is the accepted value | Visit 1(up to 30 minutes) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency of screening with standard exam and Peek Acuity | Compare average exam time between standard exam and Peek Acuity | Visit 1(up to 30 minutes) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sarah K Jones | Duke University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke UMC | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12812897 | Background | Barry JC, Konig HH. Test characteristics of orthoptic screening examination in 3 year old kindergarten children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;87(7):909-16. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.7.909. | |
| 12939288 | Background | Miller JM, Dobson V, Harvey EM, Sherrill DL. Cost-efficient vision screening for astigmatism in native american preschool children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Sep;44(9):3756-63. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0970. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014786 | Vision Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012678 | Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Patient randomly assigned to either be screened first with standard clinic technique or cell phone application. Patient is then screened with other method.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard Visual Screening |
| Other |
Visual screening exam conducted in Duke University Eye Center |
|
| 22507224 | Background | Anstice N, Spink J, Abdul-Rahman A. Review of preschool vision screening referrals in South Auckland, New Zealand. Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Jul;95(4):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00713.x. Epub 2012 Apr 17. |
| 8827927 | Background | Simons K. Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996 Jul-Aug;41(1):3-30. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)81990-x. |
| 19669781 | Background | Schmucker C, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R, Antes G, Lange S, Lagreze W, Kleijnen J. Diagnostic accuracy of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors: a systematic review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;247(11):1441-54. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1150-2. Epub 2009 Aug 11. |
| 19098035 | Background | Alexander P, Rahi JS, Hingorani M. Provision and cost of children's and young people's eye services in the UK: findings from a single primary care trust. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;93(5):645-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.149203. Epub 2008 Dec 19. |
| 12917617 | Background | Joish VN, Malone DC, Miller JM. A cost-benefit analysis of vision screening methods for preschoolers and school-age children. J AAPOS. 2003 Aug;7(4):283-90. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(03)00116-2. |
| 26022921 | Background | Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IA, Weiss HA, Jordan S, Kuper H, Burton MJ. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;133(8):930-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1468. |
| 12689914 | Background | Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine Section on Ophthalmology; American Association of Certified Orthoptists; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus; American Academy of Ophthalmology. Eye examination in infants, children, and young adults by pediatricians: organizational principles to guide and define the child health care system and/or improve the health of all children. Ophthalmology. 2003 Apr;110(4):860-5. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00414-7. |
| 31326117 | Derived | Zhao L, Stinnett SS, Prakalapakorn SG. Visual Acuity Assessment and Vision Screening Using a Novel Smartphone Application. J Pediatr. 2019 Oct;213:203-210.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jul 18. |
| D012816 |
| Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |